[tcpinc] New co-chair for TCPINC

Dear all, Let me first thank you all who volunteered for the TCPINC co-chair position. I have received an unusual high number of responses to the call and I did interview only a subset of the candidates, just because of the limited time available. Please welcome Kyle Rose (email: kr...@krose.

Re: [tcpinc] 1 vs 2

Hi Lars, Am 04.11.15 um 09:57 schrieb Eggert, Lars: Hi, first, I apologize if I missed a message and was confused about the process we'd be following to come to a decision. But I was a bit surprised that we now seem to have adopted both individual documents as WG items? I had - probably mistake

[tcpinc] Welcome David Black as new co-chair for tcpinc

Dear all, First, thanks to everybody who volunteered as a tcpinc co-chair. David Black (david.bl...@emc.com) will be the new co-chair for tcpinc starting from today. Thanks to David! However, I will appoint a third co-chair during or after the IETF-94 meeting. I am still reading through all

[tcpinc] Call for volunteers: Looking for tcpinc co-chair

Dear all, I am looking for a co-chair for the TCPINC working group, teaming up with Mirja Kühlewind. Please reply directly to me, if you are interested. The deadline is 10/23. Thanks, Martin ___ Tcpinc mailing list Tcpinc@ietf.org https://www.i

Re: [tcpinc] Summary of arguments from call

Hi, Am 03.08.15 um 18:51 schrieb Martin Thomson: In the interest of factual accuracy, and because I didn't have a chance to refute these arguments previously... On 3 August 2015 at 08:15, Mirja Kühlewind wrote: a) TCP-use-TLS Contra: - dependency on TLS and update cycles of other working grou

Re: [tcpinc] CORRECTION: Reminder: Ongoing Working Group Last Call about drafts to choose as WG item

ore making a further adjustment, I'd certainly understand. Thanks, Ted On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Martin Stiemerling mailto:mls.i...@gmail.com>> wrote: Dear all, **Please use this CORRECTED version, as one option to choose

Re: [tcpinc] CORRECTION: Reminder: Ongoing Working Group Last Call about drafts to choose as WG item

Am 24.07.15 um 12:19 schrieb Ted Hardie: Hi Martin, On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Martin Stiemerling mailto:mls.i...@gmail.com>> wrote: ​ This call is a simple procedural step: There were hums in the session on whether to go for just a), just b), or both. This c

Re: [tcpinc] CORRECTION: Reminder: Ongoing Working Group Last Call about drafts to choose as WG item

session on the list, no more. Everything out of the a WG meeting needs to be confirmed on the mailing list. I do not think that anybody is disagreeing about this, right? Thanks, Martin Thanks, Ted On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Martin Stiemerling mailto:mls.i...@gmail.com>>

[tcpinc] CORRECTION: Reminder: Ongoing Working Group Last Call about drafts to choose as WG item

but it is actually the starting point when the WG has full change control about the content of the draft! Regards, Martin Stiemerling Transport Area Director ___ Tcpinc mailing list Tcpinc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc

[tcpinc] Reminder: Ongoing Working Group Last Call about drafts to choose as WG item

accepting a draft is not the end of working on the technical content of the draft, but it is actually the starting point when the WG has full change control about the content of the draft! Regards, Martin Stiemerling Transport Area Director

[tcpinc] New WG chair: Mirja Kühlewind

Dear, Please welcome Mirja Kühlewind as the new chair for the tcpinc WG. Thanks, Martin ___ Tcpinc mailing list Tcpinc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc

Re: [tcpinc] Stepping down as TCPINC chairs

Marcelo and Tero, all, Thank you to Marcelo and Tero for chairing the tcpinc WG! Martin Am 23.07.15 um 08:06 schrieb marcelo bagnulo braun: Hi, After talking to the AD, we believe that the WG would benefit from bringing new people on board to facilitate WG progress. Because of that, both Te

Re: [tcpinc] Action needed now: Ways forward for TCPINC!

Hi Joe, all, Am 16.07.15 um 17:38 schrieb Joe Touch: On 7/16/2015 3:33 AM, Martin Stiemerling wrote: Dear all, ... Here are the two propposed ways forward: 1) As neither the protocol proposal I) nor II) is achieving rough consensus, I propose to accept both as WG items and to let the WG

[tcpinc] Action needed now: Ways forward for TCPINC!

Dear all, The chairs summarized the current state of the TCPINC WG with respect to the selection of a WG protocol item in their email on 7/15. Up to now, the WG could not reach rough consensus if any of the current protocol proposals can be used as the WG item. The two actively discussed pro