Not sure what has changed in the last couple of days but apparently I need to
get back from the future.
This is an OpenBSD VM running under VMWare Fusion Professional Version 8.0.2
(3164312) Mac OS X 10.11.2
Dec 14 17:22:44 ianm-openbsd ntpd[13773]: peer 121.0.0.41 now valid
Dec 14 17:22:46 ia
On 14 December 2015 at 22:37, Okan Demirmen wrote:
> Hi - I haven't had spare cycles to look into this, nor the other recent
> patches yet, but they have not been ignored.
Oh no worries, and thanks to you!
I was just wondering because they change cwm's behaviour, which might
catch users off guar
On Mon 2015.12.14 at 20:06 +0100, Matej Nanut wrote:
> On 6 December 2015 at 15:15, Vadim Vygonets wrote:
> > Even when cycling in group, all visible windows should be
> > restacked. Patch version 3.
>
> Hello,
>
> will these patches eventually be commited to CVS?
>
> I really like this one.
Hey,
HTTP_METHOD_PATCH is not handled by relayd at all.
Well, actually in fals under default in switch().
PATCH is like PUT, eg. data is expected.
One-liner below fixes this. Tested in production.
--- relay_http.cMon Dec 14 16:16:07 2015
+++ relay_http.c.my Mon Dec 14 21:18:50 2015
@
Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2015 16:26:30 -0500
> > From: Michael McConville
> >
> > Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > It really is confusing to use off_t for something that's not a byte
> > > offset. If integer overflow really is an issue you care about, use
> > > "long long".
> >
> >
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 01:09:38PM -0500, James Turner wrote:
> SQLite 3.9.2 updated. Tested on amd64. I've included the json extension
> but haven't enabled it yet. I can leave it out if know thinks it will be
> usful at this time and can always at it later. oks?
I havent tested this yet, but i'l
On 6 December 2015 at 15:15, Vadim Vygonets wrote:
> Even when cycling in group, all visible windows should be
> restacked. Patch version 3.
Hello,
will these patches eventually be commited to CVS?
I really like this one.
Matej
This patch removes the copy argument to addarg, which is unneeded. No
functional change.
Index: mailwrapper.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/mailwrapper/mailwrapper.c,v
retrieving revision 1.21
diff -u -p -r1.21 mailwrapper.c
--- mai
Hey all,
I'm wondering, why an allocation type in kern/exec_elf.c is equal to
M_TEMP? For instance, kern/exec_script.c and kern/kern_exec.c allocate
memory as M_EXEC, and it looks more reasonable to me.
What's the reason for this?
Thanks in advance.
Mathieu - wrote:
> Mathieu - wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > On 07/12/15(Mon) 16:48, Mathieu - wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I worked a bit on umass(4) recently and had a diff to pass the
> > > > umassbus_softc's real size to free so here it
10 matches
Mail list logo