On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 10:40:57AM +0800, Nick Gasson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When I build my program with the lex(1) in OpenBSD I get the following
> warning:
>
> src/lexer.c:2415:3: warning: misleading indentation; statement is not part of
> the previous 'if'
> [-Wmisleading-indentation]
>
Hi,
When I build my program with the lex(1) in OpenBSD I get the following
warning:
src/lexer.c:2415:3: warning: misleading indentation; statement is not part of
the previous 'if'
[-Wmisleading-indentation]
return yy_is_jam ? 0 : yy_current_state;
^
I noticed this when looking through the nvme.c code the other day.
Currently, nvme_poll() has a loop like this:
while (!ISSET(state.c.flags, htole16(NVME_CQE_PHASE))) {
if (nvme_q_complete(sc, q) == 0)
delay(10);
/* XXX no timeout?
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 11:54:31AM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 11:21:27PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> > On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 11:24:05AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > On 04/05/21(Tue) 01:10, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > > > [...]
> > > > I want to run softclock()
Ashton Fagg writes:
> Ok splendid. I've regenerated these, this time including dhcpleased and
> slaacd since Florian requested I do this in private mail.
>
> I went for err(1, "unveil %s", path) per Theo's suggestion - nice and
> clear. This is now everything in sbin, bin and games. usr/{bin,
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 03:05:45PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 14:20:00 +0200
> > From: Martin Pieuchot
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> > Content-Disposition: inline
> >
> > On 14/04/21(Wed) 18:33, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > > A bogus libvorbisenc.so.3.1
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 11:21:27PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 11:24:05AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > On 04/05/21(Tue) 01:10, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > I want to run softclock() without the kernel lock. The way to go, I
> > > think, is to first push
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 11:24:05AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 04/05/21(Tue) 01:10, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > [...]
> > I want to run softclock() without the kernel lock. The way to go, I
> > think, is to first push the kernel lock down into timeout_run(), and
> > then to remove the kernel
Hi,
Add missing ftps defaults ports to servies(5).
OK?
bye,
Jan
Index: services
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/etc/services,v
retrieving revision 1.99
diff -u -p -r1.99 services
--- services18 Feb 2021 02:30:29 - 1.99
+++
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 11:24:05AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 04/05/21(Tue) 01:10, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > [...]
> > I want to run softclock() without the kernel lock. The way to go, I
> > think, is to first push the kernel lock down into timeout_run(), and
> > then to remove the kernel
Hi,
The following diff adds some missing consts for char * to the internal
program functions.
OK?
bye,
Jan
Index: extern.h
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/libexec/ftpd/extern.h,v
retrieving revision 1.21
diff -u -p -r1.21 extern.h
---
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 11:33:31AM BST, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 11:15:45AM +0100, Raf Czlonka wrote:
> > Unless I'm missing something, Hrvoje's not suing dhclient(8) - as
> > there's no 'dhcp' entry in the /etc/hostname.iwx0 - but dhcpleased(8),
> > most likely.
>
> It is
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 11:15:45AM +0100, Raf Czlonka wrote:
> Unless I'm missing something, Hrvoje's not suing dhclient(8) - as
> there's no 'dhcp' entry in the /etc/hostname.iwx0 - but dhcpleased(8),
> most likely.
It is happening in the ramdisk kernel, which is still using dhclient
at this
On 4.5.2021. 12:15, Raf Czlonka wrote:
> On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 10:55:37AM BST, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 11:47:43AM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
>>> I'm not sure that with iwx and eduroam, sysupgrade can finish. Maybe i
>>> need to wait longer, will try that ...
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 10:55:37AM BST, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 11:47:43AM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> > I'm not sure that with iwx and eduroam, sysupgrade can finish. Maybe i
> > need to wait longer, will try that ... sysupgrade will finish if iwx is
> > disabled or
On 4.5.2021. 11:55, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 11:47:43AM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
>> I'm not sure that with iwx and eduroam, sysupgrade can finish. Maybe i
>> need to wait longer, will try that ... sysupgrade will finish if iwx is
>> disabled or hostname.iwx0 is removed
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 11:47:43AM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> I'm not sure that with iwx and eduroam, sysupgrade can finish. Maybe i
> need to wait longer, will try that ... sysupgrade will finish if iwx is
> disabled or hostname.iwx0 is removed from etc before doing sysupgrade
If iwx is
On 2021-05-04 11:47 +02, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> I'm not sure that with iwx and eduroam, sysupgrade can finish. Maybe i
We have seen bugs before where we would wait for network while doing
an automated upgrade. I think bsd.rd should not bring up the network
when it detects that it's in
On 4.5.2021. 11:44, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 11:36:01AM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
>> On 4.5.2021. 11:02, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
>>> i've disabled and stopped wpa_supplicant and reboot laptop and iwx0
>>> didn't get ip but laptop did boot normally ..
>>>
>>> iwx0:
On 4.5.2021. 11:38, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 11:02:49AM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
>> On 4.5.2021. 10:47, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 10:32:02AM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
Hi all,
today i tried to do sysupgrade and it wouldn't
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 11:36:01AM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> On 4.5.2021. 11:02, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> > i've disabled and stopped wpa_supplicant and reboot laptop and iwx0
> > didn't get ip but laptop did boot normally ..
> >
> > iwx0: flags=808843 mtu
> > 1500
> > lladdr
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 11:02:49AM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> On 4.5.2021. 10:47, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 10:32:02AM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> today i tried to do sysupgrade and it wouldn't finish because of iwx
> >> errors.
> >> iwx is
On 4.5.2021. 11:02, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> On 4.5.2021. 10:47, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 10:32:02AM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> today i tried to do sysupgrade and it wouldn't finish because of iwx errors.
>>> iwx is working just fine with with
On 04/05/21(Tue) 01:10, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> [...]
> I want to run softclock() without the kernel lock. The way to go, I
> think, is to first push the kernel lock down into timeout_run(), and
> then to remove the kernel lock from each timeout, one by one.
Grabbing and releasing the
On 4.5.2021. 10:47, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 10:32:02AM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> today i tried to do sysupgrade and it wouldn't finish because of iwx errors.
>> iwx is working just fine with with snapshots, even with eduroam :)
>>
>> e14gen2# cat
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 10:32:02AM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> today i tried to do sysupgrade and it wouldn't finish because of iwx errors.
> iwx is working just fine with with snapshots, even with eduroam :)
>
> e14gen2# cat /etc/hostname.iwx0
> debug
> join "eduroam" wpa
Hi all,
today i tried to do sysupgrade and it wouldn't finish because of iwx errors.
iwx is working just fine with with snapshots, even with eduroam :)
e14gen2# cat /etc/hostname.iwx0
debug
join "eduroam" wpa wpaakms 802.1x
autoconf
e14gen2# ifconfig iwx0
iwx0:
flags=808847 mtu
1500
Noticed by the arouteserver author Pier Carlo Chiodi the new rde evaluate
all feature has a bug when a 2nd best route is withdrawn. In that case
that route got not withdrawn from the adj-rib-out.
The problem is in up_generate_updates() and the fact that 'rde evaluate
all' calls
Hi,
I want to run softclock() without the kernel lock. The way to go, I
think, is to first push the kernel lock down into timeout_run(), and
then to remove the kernel lock from each timeout, one by one.
Before we can push the kernel lock down into timeout_run() we need to
remove the kernel lock
29 matches
Mail list logo
