On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 10:27 AM Visa Hankala wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 04:29:44PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>
...
> > Under what circumstances does memory ordering matter for these
> > interfaces?
>
> Consider the following scenario:
>
> struct widget {
> struct refcnt
On Sun, 13 Mar 2022 12:02:03 -0500, Matthew Martin wrote:
> Ignoring -L which already honors rtable, su has three cases:
> -l (asme=0 asthem=1)
> -m (asme=1 asthem=0)
>(asme=0 asthem=0)
>
> -l should honor rtable; I am not sure about the other two. I think the
> least suprising would be
On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 11:24:33PM +0100, Remi Locherer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When pf processes a TCP packet with SYN and FIN flags set, it removes
> the FIN flag and continuous processing it. I propose we change that and
> let pf drop such a packet. I don't see any legit use for combining these
> two
Hi,
When pf processes a TCP packet with SYN and FIN flags set, it removes
the FIN flag and continuous processing it. I propose we change that and
let pf drop such a packet. I don't see any legit use for combining these
two flags in the same packet.
Henning added this comment 7 years ago:
XXX
> Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2022 22:59:36 +0100
> From: Alexander Bluhm
>
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 10:55:51PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > You missed atomic_cas.
>
> Fixed.
ok kettenis@
> Index: share/man/man9/membar_sync.9
> ===
>
On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 10:55:51PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> You missed atomic_cas.
Fixed.
Index: share/man/man9/membar_sync.9
===
RCS file: /data/mirror/openbsd/cvs/src/share/man/man9/membar_sync.9,v
retrieving revision 1.3
> Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2022 22:43:56 +0100
> From: Alexander Bluhm
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 10:12:40PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 21:53:13 +0100
> > > From: Alexander Bluhm
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > claudio@ mentioned that documentation for
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 10:12:40PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 21:53:13 +0100
> > From: Alexander Bluhm
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > claudio@ mentioned that documentation for membar_enter_after_atomic
> > and membar_exit_before_atomic is missing.
> >
> > ok?
>
> I think this
On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 04:29:44PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2022 12:47:13 +
> > From: Visa Hankala
> >
> > This makes the refcnt implementation issue memory barriers when
> > releasing references, splitting memory activity cleanly into preceding
> > and succeeding
> Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2022 11:35:09 +0100
> From: Martin Pieuchot
>
> Try to allocate the buffer before doing the encryption, if it fails we
> do not spend time doing the encryption. This reduce the pressure when
> swapping with low memory.
>
> ok?
Makes sense to me; ok kettenis@
> Index:
On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 02:30:23PM +0100, Solene Rapenne wrote:
> Hi, I'm playing with the new rtable feature in login.conf(5) but it
> seems one use case doesn't trigger the rtable change.
>
> I have an user called alice, if I ssh locally from my user to alice
> with ssh alice@localhost, alice
� 13.03.2022, 18:47, "Katherine Mcmillan" :
Hello all,
� Hello,�
I am interested in working with an expert OpenBSD developer who could
mentor me for a defined project. If this could be through the GSoC,
that would be ideal, but I am also interested in other mentorship
opportunities.
On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 04:17:07PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 07:53:13 +0100
> > From: Anton Lindqvist
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 01:44:47PM +, Visa Hankala wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 08:04:36AM +0100, Anton Lindqvist wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Mar 07,
> Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2022 12:47:13 +
> From: Visa Hankala
>
> This makes the refcnt implementation issue memory barriers when
> releasing references, splitting memory activity cleanly into preceding
> and succeeding stages around refcnt 1->0 transition.
>
> I think the while loop could be
> Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 07:53:13 +0100
> From: Anton Lindqvist
>
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 01:44:47PM +, Visa Hankala wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 08:04:36AM +0100, Anton Lindqvist wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 07:36:35AM +, Visa Hankala wrote:
> > > > I still think that
On Sun, 13 Mar 2022 13:26:13 +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> Works fine. Here's an updated diff with suggestions:
> - "k" was not completely removed from compress's struct compressor opt
> string, and was not needed in null_method
> - try to keep the *flag variables ordered
> - rework
Hello all,
I am interested in working with an expert OpenBSD developer who could mentor me
for a defined project. If this could be through the GSoC, that would be ideal,
but I am also interested in other mentorship opportunities. Please let me know
if you're available!
My skills/interests are
Hi, I'm playing with the new rtable feature in login.conf(5) but it
seems one use case doesn't trigger the rtable change.
I have an user called alice, if I ssh locally from my user to alice
with ssh alice@localhost, alice has the correct routing table, if I use
as root "su -l alice", then alice
On Sun 13/03/2022 14:06, Florian Obser wrote:
> anyone?
>
> On 2022-03-03 19:57 +01, Florian Obser wrote:
> > parse_packet() is used by unbound(8) to parse response packets, not
> > queries. There is no need to do all this work just to get access to
> > the query id and flags. This is what
anyone?
On 2022-03-03 19:57 +01, Florian Obser wrote:
> parse_packet() is used by unbound(8) to parse response packets, not
> queries. There is no need to do all this work just to get access to
> the query id and flags. This is what unbound(8) is doing.
>
> OK?
>
> diff --git frontend.c
This makes the refcnt implementation issue memory barriers when
releasing references, splitting memory activity cleanly into preceding
and succeeding stages around refcnt 1->0 transition.
I think the while loop could be optimized a little by re-reading
r->r_refs just after sleep_finish(). That
On 3/10/22 12:35, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 12:25:17PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
Unless anyone else finds a problem, this patch can be considered ready
for review and commit.
Of course, I forgot to apply my sysassert fix to the second phy context
command function...
This is a slightly tweaked version of the FRELE() memory barrier patch.
The barriers aim to provide clearer memory access behaviour around the
f_count 1->0 transition. With the barriers, the transition splits the
memory activity into preceding and succeeding stages that do not
overlap.
OK?
On Sat, Mar 12 2022, Solene Rapenne wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Mar 2022 15:49:40 +0100
> Solene Rapenne :
>
>> On Sat, 05 Mar 2022 19:15:02 -0700
>> "Todd C. Miller" :
>>
>> > On Sun, 06 Mar 2022 02:58:30 +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>> >
>> > > I'm not sure what you mean here. Solene's
24 matches
Mail list logo
