On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Chris Bennett
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 09:18:14PM -0500, Michael McConville wrote:
>> Chris Bennett wrote:
>> > I found a subroutine in printjob.c called sendmail with uses
>> > _PATH_SENDMAIL.
>> >
>> > I found it all over the place:
>>
>> Are you implying
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 08:46:56PM -0600, Chris Bennett wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 09:18:14PM -0500, Michael McConville wrote:
> > Chris Bennett wrote:
> > > I found a subroutine in printjob.c called sendmail with uses
> > > _PATH_SENDMAIL.
> > >
> > > I found it all over the place:
> >
> >
Chris Bennett wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 09:18:14PM -0500, Michael McConville wrote:
> > Chris Bennett wrote:
> > > I found a subroutine in printjob.c called sendmail with uses
> > > _PATH_SENDMAIL.
> > >
> > > I found it all over the place:
> >
> > Are you implying that they should be repl
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 09:18:14PM -0500, Michael McConville wrote:
> Chris Bennett wrote:
> > I found a subroutine in printjob.c called sendmail with uses
> > _PATH_SENDMAIL.
> >
> > I found it all over the place:
>
> Are you implying that they should be replaced? IIUC, we create a
> sendmail bi
Chris Bennett wrote:
> I found a subroutine in printjob.c called sendmail with uses
> _PATH_SENDMAIL.
>
> I found it all over the place:
Are you implying that they should be replaced? IIUC, we create a
sendmail binary (or at least a link) even though we no longer
technically use sendmail. See usr
I found a subroutine in printjob.c called sendmail with uses _PATH_SENDMAIL.
I found it all over the place:
blue src # ack _PATH_SENDMAIL
include/paths.h
63:#define _PATH_SENDMAIL "/usr/sbin/sendmail"
usr.bin/calendar/io.c
410:execl(_PATH_SENDMAIL, "sendmail", "-i", "-t", "-F
