On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 10:57:16AM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> I tested removing a single port from trunk and observed that both
> interfaces do end up with the same MAC address, but this happens without
> my diff already - I still don't see any behaviour after my diff wrt. MAC
> addresses or
On 2020/09/14 10:57, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 06:44:13PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > I can't test at the moment, but the other case is removing a port from
> > the trunk without destroying the trunk interface itself. That's almost
> > certainly what I was testing at
On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 06:44:13PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> I can't test at the moment, but the other case is removing a port from
> the trunk without destroying the trunk interface itself. That's almost
> certainly what I was testing at the time.
Right, that's different from destroying
On 2020/09/13 14:47, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> So there's a dance around UP interfaces already; CVS log dates this
> code back to 2010 when deraadt rearanged code into ifnewlladdr(), the
> previous if.c revision also head this dance around UP.
>
> The if_down() line I removed from trunk(4) dates
On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 01:23:59PM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 11:31:12AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2020/09/13 11:12, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > This has been tried before, I forget what but there were problems
> >
> > from chat logs when I tried this
On 2020/09/13 13:23, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 11:31:12AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2020/09/13 11:12, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > This has been tried before, I forget what but there were problems
> >
> > from chat logs when I tried this before:
> >
> > 14:52 <
On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 11:31:12AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2020/09/13 11:12, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > This has been tried before, I forget what but there were problems
>
> from chat logs when I tried this before:
>
> 14:52 < sthen> if i kill the if_down, no crash, but the mac
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2020/09/13 11:12, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > This has been tried before, I forget what but there were problems
>
> from chat logs when I tried this before:
>
> 14:52 < sthen> if i kill the if_down, no crash, but the mac address doesn't
> get updated so i end up
On 2020/09/13 11:12, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> This has been tried before, I forget what but there were problems
from chat logs when I tried this before:
14:52 < sthen> if i kill the if_down, no crash, but the mac address doesn't get
updated so i end up with the same one on em0, em1, trunk0
This has been tried before, I forget what but there were problems
--
Sent from a phone, apologies for poor formatting.
On 12 September 2020 21:16:31 Alexander Bluhm wrote:
OK bluhm@
On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 05:49:52PM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
Index: if_trunk.c
OK bluhm@
On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 05:49:52PM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> Index: if_trunk.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/net/if_trunk.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.149
> diff -u -p -r1.149 if_trunk.c
> --- if_trunk.c28 Jul
Seems reasonable. OK
On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 05:49:52PM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> Unconfiguring a member interface from trunk(4) or simply destroying the
> trunk pulls the member down for no reason, both comment and code are
> there since import, but I see no justification for doing so.
>
>
Unconfiguring a member interface from trunk(4) or simply destroying the
trunk pulls the member down for no reason, both comment and code are
there since import, but I see no justification for doing so.
aggr(4) does not pull its member down upon removal either.
I came across this after
$
13 matches
Mail list logo
