On Feb 28, 2014, at 10:02 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 02/27/2014 12:38 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 27, 2014, at 8:06 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/26/14, 11:37 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
Hi,
Fedora is considering XFS as their default file system. They support
>
On 02/27/2014 12:38 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Feb 27, 2014, at 8:06 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>
>> On 2/26/14, 11:37 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Fedora is considering XFS as their default file system. They support
>>> three primary architectures: x86_64, i686, and armv7hl. Do XFS
On Fri, 2014-02-28 at 19:08 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> %check is a toy, but because it's there we
> don't work on a test setup that's any good.
Heh. Different perspectives, I suppose, but all I seem to see at the
moment is people working on test setups all over the place. Fedora QA is
working
On Fri, 2014-02-28 at 23:57 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> And FWIW no, I dont follow the "there are some packages with incorrect
> URL, thus the field must be useless and should be removed" logic here.
Just to puree the horse further: I never said that.
I do believe that the most valuable UR
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2014-03-03
# Time: 16:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's meeting time again on Monday! The .next Working Groups are expected
to have their technical spec
On 02/28/2014 09:54 PM, David Cantrell wrote:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 11:24:48AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2014-02-28 at 15:56 +0200, Alexander Todorov wrote:
I'm not sure what purpose does the URL field serve nowadays but it looks like it
can be removed from the spec file (and RPM
==
#fedora-meeting: Fedora QA meeting
==
Meeting started by handsome_pirate at 16:04:25 UTC. The full logs are
available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-02-24/fedora-qa.2014-02-24-16.04.log.html
.
Meeting su
On Fri, 2014-02-28 at 14:54 -0500, David Cantrell wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 11:24:48AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2014-02-28 at 15:56 +0200, Alexander Todorov wrote:
> >
> > > I'm not sure what purpose does the URL field serve nowadays but it looks
> > > like it
> > > can b
On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 15:55 +0200, Alexander Todorov wrote:
> Hi folks,
> thanks for your feedback in the last few days. I've created two wiki pages
> about
> packages which don't execute their tests in %check:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Testing_in_check
>
> and another one for packages
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 11:24:48AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-02-28 at 15:56 +0200, Alexander Todorov wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure what purpose does the URL field serve nowadays but it looks
> > like it
> > can be removed from the spec file (and RPM for that matter)!
>
> No, plea
On Fri, 2014-02-28 at 15:56 +0200, Alexander Todorov wrote:
> I'm not sure what purpose does the URL field serve nowadays but it looks like
> it
> can be removed from the spec file (and RPM for that matter)!
No, please. It could be made *optional*. But there are certainly cases
where the upstre
The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
125
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19963/openstack-glance-2013.1.4-1.fc19
62
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-24023/varnish-3.0.5-1.fc19
44
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FED
On 02/27/2014 09:18 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 03:55:02PM +0200, Alexander Todorov wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>> thanks for your feedback in the last few days. I've created two wiki
>> pages about packages which don't execute their tests in %check:
>> https://fedoraproject.org
- Original Message -
> From: "Alexander Todorov"
> To: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases"
>
> Cc: "Alexander Kurtakov" , "Discussion of RPM packaging
> standards and practices for Fedora"
>
> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 3:56:43 PM
> Subject: Re: How to calculat
На 27.02.2014 21:31, Aleksandar Kurtakov написа:
I have similar feelings as ajax. It's not whether it's useless of treasure. If someone
says "give me commit rights as I want to make tests build|fix url|fix
formatting|improve BRs|etc. in package A you're maintainer" I would be more than
happy t
On Feb 28, 2014, at 1:55 AM, John Dulaney wrote:
>> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 12:38:39 -0700
>> From: Chris Murphy
>> To: Eric Sandeen
>> Cc: a...@lists.fedoraproject.org, Test Fedora
>> , x...@oss.sgi.com
>> Subject: Re: [fedora-arm] XFS on Fedora i686, armv7hl
>>
>>
>> On Feb 27, 2014, at 8:0
На 27.02.2014 18:14, Christopher Meng написа:
Interesting :
fedora-release-notes
***-fonts
Can someone point me how to test them?
See amiri-fonts, gnu-free-fonts and thai-scalable-fonts. These appear to have
some sort of testing available in the source and all three seem to be different.
#443: Better format for test compose (TC) and release candidate (RC) requests
-+---
Reporter: jreznik | Owner: adamwill
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major
> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 12:38:39 -0700
> From: Chris Murphy
> To: Eric Sandeen
> Cc: a...@lists.fedoraproject.org, Test Fedora
> , x...@oss.sgi.com
> Subject: Re: [fedora-arm] XFS on Fedora i686, armv7hl
>
>
> On Feb 27, 2014, at 8:06 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>
>> On 2/26/14, 11:37 PM, Chris Mur
19 matches
Mail list logo
