Since it is not December 9 yet, should be testing with all the updates
from updates-testing? I am talking about true testing here. Any
install with RC5 only will be left in that state until general
availability when updates will be valid.
I realize that once Fedora 21 is released, that some
On 11/28/2014 11:06 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2014-11-28 at 21:22 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
On Fri, 2014-11-28 at 21:50 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
Currently, the packages for Fedora 21 are in development/21 and
updates/testing/21. Based on my current understanding of how kojo
Currently, the packages for Fedora 21 are in development/21 and
updates/testing/21. Based on my current understanding of how kojo and
the compose process works, all of kojo's current packages are collected
into a single yum repository which is used to compose as well as create
the Live images
On 11/26/2014 03:08 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 11/24/2014 04:14 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
I know we are into this product-zed stuff with lots of emphasis on
Live installs including Live Workstation but when was the last time
pungi has been successfully run? Yes, I know that TC3 was built
On 11/24/2014 04:14 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
I know we are into this product-zed stuff with lots of emphasis on
Live installs including Live Workstation but when was the last time
pungi has been successfully run? Yes, I know that TC3 was built by
something but was pungi involved? I have
-24 at 16:14 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
I know we are into this product-zed stuff with lots of emphasis
on Live installs including Live Workstation but when was the
last time pungi has been successfully run? Yes, I know that TC3
was built by something but was pungi involved? I have been
I know we are into this product-zed stuff with lots of emphasis on Live
installs including Live Workstation but when was the last time pungi has
been successfully run? Yes, I know that TC3 was built by something but
was pungi involved? I have been assuming it was but I am unable to run
it mys
On 11/21/2014 03:22 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Would this be difficult to add?
I don't know if it'd be*difficult*, but it'd be unclear where it should
live, and it'd use up more time on the builders...
Having said I needed a boot.iso with anaconda-21.48.15-1 in it, I done
it before so I just cr
I am trying to verify that a fix work. The fix is in
anaconda-21.48.15-1 and I need to run a netinstall to test the fix.
anaconda:
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/testing/21/x86_64/a/anaconda-21.48.15-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
has the date/time stamp 2014-11-20 05:41
boot.iso:
Well, I am sure it is not a show stopper but tracker is going to be a
royal PITA for some users.
In Fedora 20 we have tracker-0.16.5-1.fc20.x86_64 and in Fedora 21 it is
tracker-1.2.4-3.fc21.x86_64. That difference in version/release means
that the tracker developer has been very busy adding
I notice that TC2 is built with anaconda-21-48.14-1 so I assume there
are other packages updated also. This anaconda package (and I assume
the others) are not currently on the mirrors. When can we expect this
packages to appear on the mirrors? Is 24 hours a reasonable expectation?
Gene
--
t
On 11/05/2014 09:21 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Sorry to start yet another thread on the same issue But I
only just now discover that once you install "Fedora Workstation"
you can't install another desktop
Try,
# yum swa
On 11/07/2014 04:24 PM, Peter Jones wrote:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 11:34:16AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
More criteria time, folks!
So we managed to get the Windows multi-boot criterion revised and an OS
X multi-boot criterion added, but we did not yet manage to come to a
consensus on exactl
On 11/05/2014 07:49 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 16:13 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
Bill, Stephen, Matt, Kalev - I think we could stand to take another look
at this. I see two immediate issues:
2) We just don't have a good story for installing extra desktops
post-install an
On 11/05/2014 12:35 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 10/26/14 11:06, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 10:51 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 10/26/14 10:48, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 10:44 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 10/26/14 10:40, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2014-10-26
Fedora 21 has introduced a new/different approach to packaging of the
distribution software: "productized" collections of packages which are
installed via a Live Install. At first I was not sure I liked the
approach but have come around to liking it a lot.
And then there is Fedora-Server-neti
On 11/02/2014 11:35 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2014-11-02 at 01:44 -0400, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 11/01/2014 08:17 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2014-11-01 at 14:28 -0400, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
Has https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1154235 been fixed in
Beta RC4
On 11/01/2014 08:17 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2014-11-01 at 14:28 -0400, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
Has https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1154235 been fixed in
Beta RC4?
While the live installs such as
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/21_Beta_RC4/Live/x86_64/Fedora-Live
Has https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1154235 been fixed in
Beta RC4?
While the live installs such as
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/21_Beta_RC4/Live/x86_64/Fedora-Live-LXDE-x86_64-21_Beta-4.iso
come up as Fedora, then I build my own under mock using livecd-creator,
point
On 10/26/2014 11:22 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 22:41 -0400, EndUser wrote:
From what I've seen from digging over the past few months, this is no
way to make friends and become popular, but I see that the F21
installer is letting folks config /boot as a btrfs subvolume onc
On 10/21/2014 12:12 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2014-10-21 at 11:31 -0400, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
Well, at least kickstart works. Also live-lxde works.
However, "Generic" ... has the Fedora Project been renamed the "Generic
Project"??? I am having a WTF moment
Well, at least kickstart works. Also live-lxde works.
However, "Generic" ... has the Fedora Project been renamed the "Generic
Project"??? I am having a WTF moment!
Both the kickstart install (using the workstation netinstall) and the
liveinst with the live-lxde iso result in /etc/system-rel
On 10/06/2014 12:48 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
On 10/06/14 10:47, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
I have an updated Fedora 21 alpha that has worked perfectly until
this morning's update. I rebooted and it no longer recognizes my
password at the GUI loin screen. I doe
On 10/04/2014 01:35 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 18:04 -0300, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
I don't know why you see it as an F19 to F20 regression, because I'm
fairly sure it's been broken the whole time.
I have two servers
On 09/29/2014 03:32 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2014-09-08 at 11:09 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
re: dual boot criteria for existing Linux + new Fedora install
On Sep 7, 2014, at 6:52 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
"The installer must be able to install into free space alongside
existing
On 09/24/2014 09:41 AM, Lawrence E Graves wrote:
On 09/24/14 21:26, Lawrence E Graves wrote:
> I am struggling with how to select the btrfs file system in Fedora 21. Is
this a bug that has not been solved or is it my lack of knowledge in the
installation of the new Fedora 21. Please advise or c
On 09/17/2014 03:39 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Sep 17, 2014, at 10:55 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
Have I missed some sort of announcement concerning the distribution packaging
changes starting with Fedora 21?
Where is the equivalent of this
http://mirror.web-ster.com/fedora/releases/20
Have I missed some sort of announcement concerning the distribution
packaging changes starting with Fedora 21?
Where is the equivalent of this
http://mirror.web-ster.com/fedora/releases/20/Fedora/x86_64/iso/Fedora-20-x86_64-DVD.iso
for Fedora 21. All of the current isos under TCx and RC1 are f
On 09/16/2014 05:54 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 16:57:53 -0400
Gene Czarcinski wrote:
>In TC7 kickstart is broken. Anybody know (has run) a kickstart
>install with one of the TC versions of F21?
>
>Gene
we use kickstarts to install the cloud images, TC6, TC7
On 09/16/2014 05:54 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 16:57:53 -0400
Gene Czarcinski wrote:
>In TC7 kickstart is broken. Anybody know (has run) a kickstart
>install with one of the TC versions of F21?
>
>Gene
we use kickstarts to install the cloud images, TC6, TC7
In TC7 kickstart is broken. Anybody know (has run) a kickstart install
with one of the TC versions of F21?
Gene
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 09/13/2014 03:14 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 09/13/2014 01:03 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2014-09-12 at 18:18 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
And then also propose that bug for Fedora 21 beta freeze exception.
It's virtually certain it'd pass. I mean, it probably could be
in
On 09/13/2014 01:03 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2014-09-12 at 18:18 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
And then also propose that bug for Fedora 21 beta freeze exception.
It's virtually certain it'd pass. I mean, it probably could be
incorporated without a freeze exception if it goes in before b
On 09/12/2014 08:18 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Sep 10, 2014, at 1:25 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
>On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 15:16:18 -0400
>Gene Czarcinski wrote:
>
>>Personally, I do not use os-prober and prefer to create
>>/etc/grub.d/40_custom files which use configfile
On 09/11/2014 03:08 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 14:28 -0400, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
libvirt-sandbox Secure Containers (virt-sandbox-service) are seriously
broken on Fedora 21 as of TC6 plus today's updates:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135762
Any chan
On 09/11/2014 03:10 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 15:16 -0400, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
Question: Why isn't this an alpha blocker. RHBZ#1108296 has a patch
which fixes the problem.
Well, because we don't have a criterion. Which is kinda what the thread
is about.
On 09/10/2014 03:25 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 15:16:18 -0400
Gene Czarcinski wrote:
>Personally, I do not use os-prober and prefer to create
>/etc/grub.d/40_custom files which use configfile to "chain-load" other
>configuration files.
Me too, which is why I
On 09/04/2014 04:50 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Mon, 2014-09-01 at 21:46 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
I think the language you have is functional, it just needs a delimiter
establishing our purview. Although, I'd suggest the size of the
distribution doesn't matter, if we nerf someone's system
libvirt-sandbox Secure Containers (virt-sandbox-service) are seriously
broken on Fedora 21 as of TC6 plus today's updates:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135762
Any chance of this being fixed sooner rather than later?
libvirt-sandbox-v0.5.1-4 works fine on F20 (after applying the
The current anaconda-21.39-1 in rawhide includes the update enabling
/boot to be installed on a btrfs subvolume or as a simple directory
under rootfs ("/") which itself may be a btrfs subvolume. With
grub2-2.02 and os-prober-1.58-6, the ability to have /boot on btrfs is
supported ... except fo
Currently, it is a bit difficult to do any testing which involves doing
an install.
First, the gui is broken because of a gtk3 problem so you cannot do a
gui install:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1102793
[Is it really going to take 2-3 weeks to get this fixed??]
So, lets try a
On 05/29/2014 12:42 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On May 27, 2014, at 9:30 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 05/27/2014 12:56 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On May 23, 2014, at 12:46 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
I don't really find them 'astronomically' slow any more, now that
slub_debug is l
On 05/28/2014 12:06 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
Has anyone gotten a successful kickstart install with current rawhide?
With the smae ks file (except using eth0 for the network device), a
Fedora 20 kickstart install completed nicely.
Doing the "same" (ens3 instead of eth0) kick
Has anyone gotten a successful kickstart install with current rawhide?
With the smae ks file (except using eth0 for the network device), a
Fedora 20 kickstart install completed nicely.
Doing the "same" (ens3 instead of eth0) kickstart with rawhide 5/27/2014
DVD iso, it completely ignored the
On 05/27/2014 12:56 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On May 23, 2014, at 12:46 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
I don't really find them 'astronomically' slow any more, now that
slub_debug is left off most of the time. Slightly slower than regular
kernels, sure, but perfectly fine for testing. Is it different
On 05/21/2014 12:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 06:27 -0700, Thomas Gilliard wrote:
Problem is at the moment only f21 (rawhide) live SoaS live writes a
booting f21 DE.
Other lives give "unaligned pointer 0x3feefa81" INIT18: BOOT FAILURE
on reboot after installation.[1]
T
On 05/12/2014 11:16 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 12 May 2014 09:18:38 -0400
Gene Czarcinski wrote:
I must be on the not-so-random-screw-list because it seems that
anything based on rawhide after about May 7th hangs in bootup (see
attached
I must be on the not-so-random-screw-list because it seems that anything
based on rawhide after about May 7th hangs in bootup (see attached
screenshot).
I have a boot.iso (anaconda-21.35-1) downloaded on May 7th as well as a
small LIVE-LXDE iso which I created on May 7th which both work ... we
A little bored because the alpha of Fedora 21 is not out yet? Well, do
I have something for you. You can help me test grubby updated to
support /boot on a btrfs subvolume, btrfs volume, or as a directory on
rootfs on a btrfs subvolume. Naturally testing on other filesystems is
needed too to
On 12/13/2013 03:20 AM, poma wrote:
On 13.12.2013 08:25, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>I argue that we should get rid of the DVD it's an era of the past and
>just provide net-install iso and lives.
Probably there are good reasons why the DVD is still here.
Indeed! There are environments/sit
On 12/12/2013 02:10 AM, Andre Robatino wrote:
NOTE: The 32-bit Install DVD is over its size limit.
As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Final Release Candidate 1
(RC1) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/t
It is kind of difficult to file new bug reports if, when I select the
product Fedora, I get a "502 proxy error". If instead of selecting the
product Fedora I select the product Fedora Documentation, things work as
normal.
Gene
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
On 11/26/2013 05:24 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Nov 26, 2013, at 3:16 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
and here is the one from the /boot on ext4 but rootfs on btrfs:
label Fedora (3.11.8-300.fc20.x86_64)
kernel /vmlinuz-3.11.8-300.fc20.x86_64
append vconsole.keymap=us vconsole.font
On 11/26/2013 04:01 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Nov 26, 2013, at 1:41 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033764
Can someone tell me if I should be able to create a system using the extlinux bootloader
with /boot on a regular partition formated ext4 and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033764
Can someone tell me if I should be able to create a system using the
extlinux bootloader with /boot on a regular partition formated ext4 and
the rootfs ("/") on a btrfs subvol?
This is no show stopper if it should work, but it does not work.
On 11/21/2013 10:25 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Nov 21, 2013, at 8:04 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2013-11-21 at 19:52 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Nov 21, 2013, at 5:08 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2013-11-21 at 14:53 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
btrfs-progs-0.20.rc1.20131114gi
On 11/18/2013 03:30 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 11/17/2013 03:23 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
So I'm trying to preallocate a VM image file using dd and I'm getting
a weird hang regardless of file system (XFS and Btrfs so far).
Existing shells, local and ssh, are very sluggish but wor
On 11/17/2013 03:23 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
So I'm trying to preallocate a VM image file using dd and I'm getting a weird
hang regardless of file system (XFS and Btrfs so far). Existing shells, local
and ssh, are very sluggish but work. I can't create new shells, either local or
ssh, they time
On 10/20/2013 01:11 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Oct 20, 2013, at 4:38 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
Before 20.25.1, if you had an existing swap on a regular partition or a logical
volume and you specified --noformat, that swap specification was added to
fstab. With 20.25.1, this is no longer
On 10/19/2013 06:36 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2013-10-19 at 09:45 -0400, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017435 - "Anaconda uses
LVM when Standard Partition is selected in text mode" (anaconda) - this
bug has been verified fixed by
On 10/19/2013 07:20 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hi folks, and welcome to the Fedora 20 Beta blocker bug news...
The bad news is that we're still some way from a viable Beta RC. We need
work on several blockers, all of which is outlined below. I'll start
with bugs that need work from developers; Q
Shouldn't the Fedora ISOs be named:
Fedora-20-Beta-TC1-x86_64-DVD.iso
rather than:
Fedora-20-Beta-x86_64-DVD.iso
I notice that the spin and live ISOs are all named "Beta-TC1" rather
than just "Beta"
Yes, I know, a nit.
Gene
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubs
On 10/03/2013 05:09 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
I installed F20-Beta TC1 in VirtualBox, without UEFI flag (own
partitioning, x86_64, booting from netinst.iso) flawlessly. The
installed system hangs on boot, only a black screen. Running the iso in
the troubleshooting mode and (re)writing the grub2 b
Anyone who plans to install F20 alpha where they will be re-using
existing LVM logical volumes should first look at this bugzilla report:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009678
While the problem definitely shows up with a kickstart install it may
also be true with a regular instal
On 09/20/2013 01:22 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2013-09-20 at 12:35 -0400, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 09/20/2013 11:54 AM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Fri, 2013-09-20 at 00:56 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
It was changed because people complained about having their name visible
in public
On 09/20/2013 10:44 PM, John Morris wrote:
On Thu, 2013-09-19 at 11:02 +1000, Ankur Sinha wrote:
If there's only one user, the log out option doesn't appear and you need
to run "gnome-session-quit" in the "alt f2" command dialog to log out.
Ok, clever idea. Just wondering what kind of thought
On 09/20/2013 11:54 AM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Fri, 2013-09-20 at 00:56 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
It was changed because people complained about having their name visible
in public places where they might not want it to be.
--
Thats one reason. Another one is that it tends to be too big
On 09/18/2013 09:59 AM, nonamedotc wrote:
On 09/18/2013 08:49 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
OK, so we changed the interface yet again for the user in Gnome
3/gnome-shell. Just how does one logoff or do a switch user?? I can
do a shutdown/restart. I can suspend. I can bring up the setting
OK, so we changed the interface yet again for the user in Gnome
3/gnome-shell. Just how does one logoff or do a switch user?? I can do
a shutdown/restart. I can suspend. I can bring up the setting
application. But logout and switch user seems to have gotten lost ...
or if it is there it su
On 01/15/2013 01:12 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 13:07:18 -0500
Gene Czarcinski wrote:
Obviously, I have not checked every mirror site but those I have
check appear to have packages missing from
releases/18/Fedora/x86_64/os/ that are not missing from
development/18/x86_64/os
Obviously, I have not checked every mirror site but those I have check
appear to have packages missing from releases/18/Fedora/x86_64/os/ that
are not missing from development/18/x86_64/os/
There is more than one package missing but let me cite "nedit"
I suspect that only those who do a kickst
I have located and submitted a patch to correct a problem with grub2's
handling of a three-device (actually, anything more than two) btrfs
volume. Here is the bugzilla report:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890955
And here is the patch:
---
On 12/31/2012 07:09 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-12-27 at 16:45 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889794
I have a hard time believe that I am the only person seeing this
problem. It only occurs with a qemu-kvm virtual guest (F17, F18, does
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889794
I have a hard time believe that I am the only person seeing this
problem. It only occurs with a qemu-kvm virtual guest (F17, F18, does
not matter) and running on a F18 virtualization host (with all updates
applied).
The problem is that the
I am having a problem doing a btrfs install using the smoke12
netinstall. I am not having a problem if I use the TC3 netinstall.
These are fully "automatic" kickstart installs into q qemu-kvm/libvirt
virtual guest. The install dies installing the bootloader (I have not
tried this without ins
On 12/20/2012 05:11 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 16:53 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
There are updates available for imsettings. But, something is messed up
with a dependency problem.
This means that you cannot update a current F18beta.
This means that an install fails
There are updates available for imsettings. But, something is messed up
with a dependency problem.
This means that you cannot update a current F18beta.
This means that an install fails because of it.
The claim is that imsettings-desktop-module(x86_64) = 1.5.1-1.fc18 is
required.
imsettings
On 12/18/2012 03:36 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 15:02 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 12/18/2012 01:34 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 11:15 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
OK, so maybe I an nuts but it seems to me that there is this 800 pound
gorilla
On 12/18/2012 01:34 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 11:15 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
OK, so maybe I an nuts but it seems to me that there is this 800 pound
gorilla wondering around the Fedora 18 tent and its name is firewalld!
Or it with respect to virtual guests and libvirt
On 12/18/2012 01:34 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 11:15 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
OK, so maybe I an nuts but it seems to me that there is this 800 pound
gorilla wondering around the Fedora 18 tent and its name is firewalld!
Or it with respect to virtual guests and libvirt
On 12/18/2012 11:54 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
On 12/18/2012 08:15 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
OK, so maybe I an nuts but it seems to me that there is this 800
pound gorilla wondering around the Fedora 18 tent and its name is
firewalld! Or it with respect to virtual guests and
OK, so maybe I an nuts but it seems to me that there is this 800 pound
gorilla wondering around the Fedora 18 tent and its name is firewalld!
Or it with respect to virtual guests and libvirt (since libvirt is a
critical part of networking support).
Maybe I am missing some critical information
On 12/15/2012 10:23 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 12/15/2012 09:19 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
I am having a few problems on F18 running in a qemu/kvm virtual. I
need some advice on what data to collect and what package should the
problem be bugzill'ed against.
1. Install gnome desktop.
On 12/15/2012 09:19 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
I am having a few problems on F18 running in a qemu/kvm virtual. I
need some advice on what data to collect and what package should the
problem be bugzill'ed against.
1. Install gnome desktop. The firstboot gui runs and is OK. After
logi
I am having a few problems on F18 running in a qemu/kvm virtual. I need
some advice on what data to collect and what package should the problem
be bugzill'ed against.
1. Install gnome desktop. The firstboot gui runs and is OK. After
login (or maybe even on the login screen), there is no mou
On 12/11/2012 01:56 PM, David Lehman wrote:
On Tue, 2012-12-11 at 07:33 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 12/11/2012 07:10 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 12/10/2012 06:37 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 16:22 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
3. Handle predefined pools and
On 12/11/2012 07:10 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 12/10/2012 06:37 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 16:22 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
3. Handle predefined pools and subvolumes.
This is working in current (post-beta) versions.
Where are these versions? I'm not seeing any
On 12/10/2012 06:37 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 16:22 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
3. Handle predefined pools and subvolumes.
This is working in current (post-beta) versions.
Where are these versions? I'm not seeing anything newer than 18.37 in koji.
That is the latest po
On 12/10/2012 02:33 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
As I see it, the problem with btrfs is that you cannot really "reuse"
a btrfs subvolume in every circumstance. In some cases such as /home,
it should be and better be) possible ... have not tested this yet
because I got hung up trying
Read on, there is some good news also.
On 12/10/2012 11:51 AM, David Lehman wrote:
On Sun, 2012-12-09 at 11:48 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
3. Using my newly created F18-beta-livecd, I attempted to install into
a predefined LV .. this worked BUT /boot/grub2/grub.cfg did not exist
and grub2
On 12/09/2012 02:55 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 12/09/2012 11:48 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
I have been trying different things with respect to installing
F18-beta x86_64 using both the DVD and the livcd-desktop images. One
problem I am having is trying to figure out what is suppose to work
On 12/09/2012 11:48 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
I have been trying different things with respect to installing
F18-beta x86_64 using both the DVD and the livcd-desktop images. One
problem I am having is trying to figure out what is suppose to work
and what is not. This primarily concerns
I have been trying different things with respect to installing F18-beta
x86_64 using both the DVD and the livcd-desktop images. One problem I am
having is trying to figure out what is suppose to work and what is not.
This primarily concerns storage configuration but there is more (see
below).
On 12/06/2012 12:19 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 12/06/2012 10:12 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 12/05/2012 09:07 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Dec 5, 2012, at 11:24 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
No Logical Volumes listed. There are only the regular partitions
and the Physical Volume partitions
On 12/06/2012 10:12 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 12/05/2012 09:07 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Dec 5, 2012, at 11:24 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
No Logical Volumes listed. There are only the regular partitions
and the Physical Volume partitions listed under unknown.
Did a pvscan which
On 12/05/2012 09:07 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Dec 5, 2012, at 11:24 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
No Logical Volumes listed. There are only the regular partitions and the
Physical Volume partitions listed under unknown.
Did a pvscan which showed the three VGs on this system. Then I did a
On 12/05/2012 01:24 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 12/05/2012 06:57 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
As far as getting F18 installed, some of this is OBE because I used
fedup and it worked just fine so I now have a live F18 system for
testing.
However, I would like the installer to work and of all
On 12/05/2012 06:57 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
As far as getting F18 installed, some of this is OBE because I used
fedup and it worked just fine so I now have a live F18 system for
testing.
However, I would like the installer to work and of all the parts that
I consider critical, storage
, 2012, at 11:52 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
I am not sure how things are suppose to work but I do not see ANY LVs
In Manual Partitioning, on the left side, you do not have an +Unknown listing
located under -New Fedora 18 Installation? Or there are no LV's listed?
I will go back and double
On 12/04/2012 05:55 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Dec 4, 2012, at 3:13 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
You'll need to make sure you've manually created an LV because neither anaconda
autopart or Manual Partitioning can create an LV from available VG free space.
By this I mean, create the LV outside of
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
