Re: [PATCH] flood: install target

2002-09-11 Thread Jacek Prucia
wiadomosc od Aaron Bannert, z dnia Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 01:08:42PM -0700 > On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 12:29:56PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > httpd and APR both do not have their default prefix set to > > /usr/local, but rather /usr/local/{apache2,apr}. I think it's > > better to follow that s

Re: [PATCH] flood: install target

2002-09-11 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 12:29:56PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > httpd and APR both do not have their default prefix set to > /usr/local, but rather /usr/local/{apache2,apr}. I think it's > better to follow that strategy than /usr/local for the clueless > newbie who doesn't use --prefix. -- j

Re: [PATCH] flood: install target

2002-09-11 Thread Thom May
* Justin Erenkrantz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 10:24:45AM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote: > > I don't understand why this is an issue. I use --prefix to define where > > things should be installed. Typically that defaults to /usr/local. > > Any reason we shouldn't do the same

Re: [PATCH] flood: install target

2002-09-11 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 10:24:45AM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote: > I don't understand why this is an issue. I use --prefix to define where > things should be installed. Typically that defaults to /usr/local. > Any reason we shouldn't do the same? (I'm ok with our directory > being called flood or flo

Re: [PATCH] flood: install target

2002-09-11 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 04:22:36AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > if you really don't like /usr/local (why? :), then we could use ... > > /usr/local/flood +1 > > /usr/local/flood is fine with me. It fits with how httpd and APR > are setup by default. -- justin I don't understand why this

Re: [PATCH] flood: install target

2002-09-11 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 02:01:24PM +0200, Jacek Prucia wrote: > Uhmm. And since I saw few +1's for splitting APR/APR-util and httpd > releases, maybe we schould also get rid of those intree libs? I'll try > to play around with external APR/APR-util and see if flood builds clean > that way. It shou

Re: [PATCH] flood: install target

2002-09-11 Thread Jacek Prucia
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002 09:39:58 -0700 Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > > This patch has one problem. Install dir is cluttered with lotsa > > apr/apu stuff (*-config scripts, includes, libraries) -- even when > > flood is built with --disable-shared. I've had enough of autoconf > >

Re: POST with no data

2002-09-11 Thread Gary Benson
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 05:55:27PM +0100, Gary Benson wrote: > I've been trying to write some tests and have been trying to send POST > requests with no body. It seems that Apache::TestRequest::POST only > adds a Content-Length when the length of the content is nonzero, so > attempts to 'POST "/f