> the various types of URLs. Fortunately, the client prints the URLs before it
> tests them. Cut-n-paste the failing URLs into a browser navigation bar and
> hit
> enter. What does the browser display?
Even better, the manager script dumps the result of its tests to files with
names like 'dync
Joshua Schnee wrote:
I am attempting to set up the latest Apache server and RHEL 64bit to use
in a Specweb99 run and am running into cgi issues. I am very new to
Apache, and am having difficulty getting apache to run/use/find my
cgi-script. Static content works fine, but I am getting improper
>-Original Message-
>From: Sander Temme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[SNIP]
>
>> There's one more thing I noticed (might be specific to
>HP-UX) : I saw more
>> errors with keepalive ON rather than when it was OFF.
>
>I think you may be looking at a problem where server and client(s) are
>mess
>> I recall hearing that SysV sems are notorious for that on
>> some platforms.
>
> I'm thinking of having the SEM_UNDO flag while creating the semaphore (if
> it's not already enabled)
APR's sysvsem IPC locks have undo enbaled.
> There's one more thing I noticed (might be specific to HP-UX) : I
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[SNIP]
>Two possibilities:
>
>* the command/Fetch URI is stuck also, or
I don't think the client did any Fetch when apache stopped.
>* something died holding the post lock, and it didn't get
>automagically cleaned u
MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote:
I enabled the POST transactions, and all of a sudden, the apache process is
now hung (this is first time I'm seeing this behaviour).. The stack is :
(gdb) t 21
[Switching to thread 21 (system thread 29207)]
#0 0xc0306850:0 in _semop_sys+0x30
_body+0x490 ()
from /usr/lib/hpux64/libpthread.so.1
Any ideas ?
-Madhu
>-Original Message-
>From: MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 9:07 AM
>To: 'dev@httpd.apache.org'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subjec
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[SNIP]
>I'm glad you're making progress. But I'm wondering why
>raising the mod_cgid
>Listen backlog was so important. If 100 mod_cgid connections
>wasn't enough at
>some point, either the workload is spikey or t
MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote:
I think I found the problem (.. and it's not the cgid exiting problem).
The problem was because the default Listen Backlog in mod_cgid was a little
small (100 outstanding connections). I got the following tusc log for the
httpd processes :
{62717} con
#x27;t connect" errors. I increased it to 1024.
-Madhu
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 1:48 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Regarding Apache 2.0.48 and specweb99
>
>
>M
MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote:
Hmmn. Interesting.
1. Did you include the cgid restart fix ?
I don't think so. It's the httpd-2.0.48 tarball + mod_specweb99.
2. Are you driving the server with the SPECweb99 recommended CGI load ?
DYNAMIC_CGI_GET=.005
I believe that's the standard.
--
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 1:50 PM
>>To: dev@httpd.apache.org
>>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: Re: Regarding Apache 2.0.48 and specweb99
>>
>>
>>MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote:
&g
2003 1:50 PM
>To: dev@httpd.apache.org
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Regarding Apache 2.0.48 and specweb99
>
>
>MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote:
>> Hi Greg,
>> The recent set of discussions prompted me to get some
>Apache numbers
>> o
MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote:
Hi Greg,
The recent set of discussions prompted me to get some Apache numbers
out there - and when I started with the SPECweb99 run, I experienced a major
hang in the Apache, and the cgid daemon getting killed (I don't know how).
Have you also
MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote:
cgid should _never_ exit without something in the error log.
I tried attaching tusc to the cgi daemon - but since the daemon dies at a
random time, my log file was getting too full, and I had to just stop it.
Why not just let tusc write to a conso
g
>Subject: RE: Regarding Apache 2.0.48 and specweb99
>
>
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[SNIP]
>
>>cgid should _never_ exit without something in the error log.
>>That makes it
>>sound like
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[SNIP]
>cgid should _never_ exit without something in the error log.
>That makes it
>sound like a core problem, i.e. ap_process_child_status() or a
>signal handler is
>fubar, in addition to whatever made the cgi d
l Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 6:27 AM
To: MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
Subject: Re: Regarding Apache 2.0.48 and specweb99
MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote:
Hi Greg,
The recent set of discussions prompted me
18 matches
Mail list logo
