On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 09:21:23AM -0700, David N. Welton wrote:
And I would like an HTTP tester library. I think that if done in this
way, it would be versatile enough to replace ab, and it would also
give people the freedom to experiment with other front ends. Like
someting in Tk, gtk, or
Aaron Bannert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 09:21:23AM -0700, David N. Welton wrote:
And I would like an HTTP tester library. I think that if done in
this way, it would be versatile enough to replace ab, and it would
also give people the freedom to experiment with
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 09:21:23AM -0700, David N. Welton wrote:
[...]
And I would like an HTTP tester library. I think that if done in this
way, it would be versatile enough to replace ab, and it would also
give people the freedom to experiment with other front ends. Like
someting in Tk,
Jacek Prucia [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is it a goal of the flood project to make a library out of it? In
other words, expose an API that other programs could pass data
into and out of, and link to? Or will XML be the only way to do
this?
It will probably be XML only. If you want
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 06:15:43PM -0700, David N. Welton wrote:
Well, I'm primarily interested in seeing flood as a versatile a tool
as possible... which for me means a library that I can use with other
things, and also a simple command line tool ala ab.
I think this would be possible if
wiadomosc od David N. Welton, z dnia Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 05:48:10PM -0700
[...]
Is it a goal of the flood project to make a library out of it? In
other words, expose an API that other programs could pass data into
and out of, and link to? Or will XML be the only way to do this?
It will
Just a few quick questions:
Is it a goal of the flood project to make a library out of it? In
other words, expose an API that other programs could pass data into
and out of, and link to? Or will XML be the only way to do this?
I started doing this with 'ab', and was directed to flood as a
