MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote:
I don't know if this has been discussed already, but I was thinking of the
following alternatives :
1. how about the listener thread in each of the child process keeps updating
a global time variable that each of the threads can refer to ?.
2. set t
>> Is this against the spec or something ?.
>
> Which spec? If you are referring to either the SPECWeb99 run rules or to
> RFC2616, neither of them dictate which syscalls you use.
IIRC, the SPECWeb99 run rules just say that you have to treat ad expiration
correctly.
S.
--
Covalent Technologie
MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote:
I tried that, and I got back error from specweb99 stating that the responses
were not conforming. (or something like that)..
OK, if you used r->request_time to replace the time() calls in mod_specweb99,
you might have convert the units if the result
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Ames [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>I'm a little confused. The gettimeofday()/apr_time_now() happens in the
httpd
>core AFAIK. Brian Pane said that it's cheaper than time() on some
platforms, I
>believe. If we want to discuss alternatives to that, the di
Infact, I tried this out yesterday (having the one global_time variable), it
gives me around 3-4% improvement. But, occasionally I do get some
un-conforming results, and I'm trying to figure out if it's because of the
time stamp.
You probably need to mutex updates to your global variable, which wi
>-Original Message-
>From: Bill Stoddard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[snip]
>You probably need to mutex updates to your global variable, which will
>probably suck out most of your performance gains.
That is correct.. The assumption I had is : timestamp is done once per
request, and since th
MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote:
I was referring to the time(), and thinking of
alternative ways of replacing the time() call.
I did that (without using the macros) - but didn't see much difference
though.. I think I was banging my head against the wall yesterday - by tring
to rem
Bill Stoddard wrote:
1. Why we need to do the apr_stat() for static files each time the
request
comes in - can it be done during the module_init() phase, and the
values put
in a array of some sort. ?.
Files change. Why not use mod_file_cache? It will (or should if it does
not have a bug) elimin
Bill Stoddard wrote:
Infact, I tried this out yesterday (having the one global_time
variable), it
gives me around 3-4% improvement. But, occasionally I do get some
un-conforming results, and I'm trying to figure out if it's because of
the
time stamp.
You probably need to mutex updates to your g
