the way I handled this was to add the following to my TEST.PL
# override root blocks
local *Apache::TestConfig::default_user = sub { return 'root' };
local *Apache::TestConfig::default_group = sub { return 'root' };
why do you need to run tests as root?
well, it was a web services
Geoffrey Young wrote:
the way I handled this was to add the following to my TEST.PL
# override root blocks
local *Apache::TestConfig::default_user = sub { return 'root' };
local *Apache::TestConfig::default_group = sub { return 'root' };
why do you need to run tests as root?
well, it was
well, it was a web services interface, and some of the services
required root permission to manipulate certain backend elements.
You still have the root permissions. it's only the server that starts
with non-root perms. why do you needed that override?
you need to be root in order to start
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
[...]
I'll take a look at this tonight as well - it'd probably
be easier to change, for Win32, the assumption of the
name of the httpd binary when apxs is present.
Thanks Randy!
Thanks for looking this over, Stas - I know
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
I've been looking at getting apxs for Win32 working on Apache 2.
where would it go? Apache::Test? mod_perl?
If there's consensus, I think the better place would be
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
In the last few weeks the following two issues were raised:
1) store a default location of httpd/apxs in Apache::Test so one should
provide it only once.
I'm +1 on this feature. Is
At 10:09 PM 7/29/2003, Randy Kobes wrote:
As far getting the right name for the Win32 binary goes with apxs
present, I don't think there's an ideal solution ... To
summarize, the problem is that apxs -q TARGET ( = httpd) is used
in Apache-Test for the name of the apache binary, whereas in
other
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
[...]
I'll take a look at this tonight as well - it'd probably
be easier to change, for Win32, the assumption of the
name of the httpd binary when apxs is present.
Thanks Randy!
Thanks for looking this over, Stas - I
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
I've been looking at getting apxs for Win32 working on Apache 2.
where would it go? Apache::Test? mod_perl?
If there's consensus, I think the better place
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
+1 on the patch
Randy, whatever you think is the best for win32, please go
ahead with it. Untill we get someone else on win32 involved,
you are pretty much free to decide how to handle things and
what's the best for the user, as long as the changes
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
[ .. ]
As Bill mentioned in another message, it looks like it would be
possible to integrate it within httpd-2.0. So rather than
including it within the Apache-Test sources, what I could do is
add a post-install script to the
11 matches
Mail list logo
