Your attachment hasn't got through (certainly to me!) - lots of email
servers don't allow .bat files and, by default, Microsoft Outlook blocks
them too!
Could you re-send the batch file inline?
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jean-
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, David Allsopp wrote:
> Your attachment hasn't got through (certainly to me!) - lots of email
> servers don't allow .bat files and, by default, Microsoft Outlook blocks
> them too!
>
> Could you re-send the batch file inline?
@if not exist %1.tex goto end
@if exist %1.mx1 del
OK, I'm a programmer so usually use "make" for TeX files as I would for
other projects and I've never had a problem with errorlevels in MiKTeX (make
aborts on any stage if the errorlevel is non-zero).
Does this shell script improve the situation - you've stated that you're
using WinXP so this file
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, David Allsopp wrote:
> OK, I'm a programmer so usually use "make" for TeX files as I would for
> other projects and I've never had a problem with errorlevels in MiKTeX (make
> aborts on any stage if the errorlevel is non-zero).
>
> Does this shell script improve the situation
Jean-Pierre Coulon skryf:
>
> I'm not aware of any documentation of this &&. Maybe we're the last to
> still program such .bat or .cmd files!
>
It's part of the Windows/Unix convergence process. Just as modern
Linux systems get more and more of a Windows look and feel (including
the need for the
Jean-Pierre Coulon wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, David Allsopp wrote:
>
> Yes it does! I can recreate the bad situation by expanding your tex line
> on four single-command lines instead of using your && continuation string.
>
> I'm not aware of any documentation of this &&. Maybe we're the last t
> > OK, I'm a programmer so usually use "make" for TeX files as I would for
> > other projects and I've never had a problem with errorlevels in MiKTeX
> > (make
> > aborts on any stage if the errorlevel is non-zero).
> >
> > Does this shell script improve the situation -
>
> Yes it does! I can recr
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, David Allsopp wrote:
> There's a handy reference collated in
> http://www.ss64.com/nt for NT/2k/XP shell scripting.
I found relevant information by typing && in their search field. Aren't we
loosing any subtleties of errorlevel like this?
Jean-Pierre Coulon
Dear all
I have also another question: I know that both in pmx ans mtx I can
switch from a higher number of voices to a lower one. Let's consider
and example, the typical cantata with an intro for strings, then a
recitative for solo voice and continuo and then strings are back again
together with v
Hello all,
I am here providing an example: my code comes from a movement change,
in which I switch from C minor to G minor, from 3/8 to 4/4 and I'd
also like to start this movement from the beginning of a new system:
THe syntax I use at the beginning of a new block is, then,
%%K+0-2
m d4 Dp d
Carlo--
I have published one vocal piece, and I used M-Tx for it. I spent a great
deal of time resolving issues exactly like the ones you mention. And it got
even worse when I went to make parts. I think changing the number of voices
in the score is doable, but I ended up finding no good overall s
This is an pmx example that reduces the number of staves.
You may see ie:
Choosing the stafnumbers (ie 'n214bt' result in a correct place for the
intrument names, i see no other reason
for not choosing an other set, ie 'n212bt' (am i right Don?))
If you dont want to see the rests, use rbp in st
sorry, i did not see you wanted to make parts
44 2 2 0 0 0 -1
1 316 .08
continuo
violin2
violin1
voice
bttt
./
w170m h257m
f03 /
c04 /
a04 /
rp /
%
%%
L2M+5ci.07n214bt
f43 g a a /
%3rp /
%2rp /
f44 g a a /
%
%%
L3M+10i.09cn41234bttt
f03 /
c04 /
a04 /
r0 /
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Carlo Centemeri wrote:
>
> %%K+0-2
> m d4 Dp d cs d |
>
> To which I should add the LxMy command for the new "paragraph". But if
> I add it together withe the previous ones, the mtx file is compiled
> correctly, while the pmx one gives an error (I have and Rd appearing
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
