Re: [Texascavers] another bad file for old Texas Caver

2014-12-09 Thread Mark Minton via Texascavers
Again, that bad issue is the same as the one in the TSA Members area. I don't know who posted those bad issues first, but apparently one site got them from the other. In the case of the December 2002 issue, the erroneous numbering actually began with the previous issue. October, 2002 was

Re: [Texascavers] another bad file for old Texas Caver

2014-12-08 Thread George Veni via Texascavers
-Original Message- From: Texascavers [mailto:texascavers-boun...@texascavers.com] On Behalf Of Mixon Bill via Texascavers Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2014 10:44 PM To: Cavers Texas Subject: [Texascavers] another bad file for old Texas Caver The file at the Karst Information Portal for Texas

Re: [Texascavers] another bad file for old Texas Caver

2014-12-08 Thread Tina M via Texascavers
I like the section on Page 19 about pee funnels. On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Mixon Bill via Texascavers texascavers@texascavers.com wrote: The file at the Karst Information Portal for Texas Caver vol. 48, no. 7, December 2002, was a real mess. (It is really number 6, but was labeled

[Texascavers] another bad file for old Texas Caver

2014-12-07 Thread Mixon Bill via Texascavers
The file at the Karst Information Portal for Texas Caver vol. 48, no. 7, December 2002, was a real mess. (It is really number 6, but was labeled number 7 in the issue.) I suspect it was created from a preliminary version of the layout of the issue. Most of the pages in the file bear the