Re: [tw] [TW5] Node.js vs. single HTML

Hi Mike, If you create a tiddler that lists the current drafts, give it the system tag *$:/tags/EditTemplate* as well as a *list-after* field with the value *$:/ContributionBanner*, you'll end up with a list of current drafts appearing under the pink contribution banner whenever you edit a

Re: [tw] [TW5] Node.js vs. single HTML

Title: Re: [tw] [TW5] Node.js vs. single HTML Fantastic!! Ive done a couple of list filters before and just copied it into the tiddler... can this be included in all tiddlers by default (a template)? Thanks again, this is so so helpful in a small multi-user environment cheers mike Friday

Re: [tw] [TW5] Node.js vs. single HTML

Hi Mike, Something along the following lines? <$list filter="[has[draft.of]]"> __Caution__: the tiddler ''<$view field="draft.of"/>'' is currently being edited (by ''<$view field="modifier"/>'') Cheers, Xavier. -- Xavier Cazin On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Mike Smith

Re: [tw] [TW5] Node.js vs. single HTML

Is there any way of knowing if someone else is editing the same tiddler? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

Re: [tw] [TW5] Node.js vs. single HTML

I haven't tried this yet, but just today I was reading about cryptomater (https://cryptomator.org/) which encrypts your data before loading to drop box. It (or something like it) might be able to add a layer of security. Good luck, Mark On Wednesday, June 25, 2014 at 8:09:25 AM UTC-7, dodoo

Re: [tw] [TW5] Node.js vs. single HTML

Hi Mike, On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Mike Smith wrote: > If tiddlers are stored in separate files, does that mean that multiple > users can edit the wiki as long as they dont edit the same tiddler? For > tiddlers, a save then overwrites the file that was previously

Re: [tw] [TW5] Node.js vs. single HTML

If tiddlers are stored in separate files, does that mean that multiple users can edit the wiki as long as they dont edit the same tiddler? For tiddlers, a save then overwrites the file that was previously there? cheers mike On Tuesday, 24 June 2014 08:06:01 UTC+1, Jeremy Ruston wrote: > > Hi

Re: [tw] [TW5] Node.js vs. single HTML

I choose Node.js for the same reason. But I am worry about the security issue of cloud storage. Is there handy tool can automatically encrypt .tid file in local before sync with cloud? 在 2014年6月24日星期二UTC+8下午3时28分16秒，Xavier写道： Hi Ulrik, I am interested, because it seems I will be generating

Re: [tw] [TW5] Node.js vs. single HTML

Hi Ulrik Are there any performance advantages? I am particularly thinking about memory usage: are the tid-files in the node.js read as needed or are they all read in at start up, making it not much different from the single HTML file variant? Under Node.js all tiddlers are loaded into memory at

Re: [tw] [TW5] Node.js vs. single HTML

Hi Ulrik, I am interested, because it seems I will be generating a large file - for now it is just 3mb, but when I add some long tables, it may become close to 10mb. And I will keep adding. I have seen posts that tiddlywiki starts to slow down dramatically at some point (20mb if my memory

Re: [tw] [TW5] Node.js vs. single HTML

Thanks for the clarification Cheers, Ulrik 2014-06-24 9:27 GMT+02:00 Xavier Cazin caz...@gmail.com: Hi Ulrik, I am interested, because it seems I will be generating a large file - for now it is just 3mb, but when I add some long tables, it may become close to 10mb. And I will keep adding.

[tw] [TW5] Node.js vs. single HTML

Hello list, What are the advantages of running the tiddlywiki as a node.js app rather than a single file? Other than the wiki is being run as a server and can be accessed from outside. Are there any performance advantages? I am particularly thinking about memory usage: are the tid-files in