Hi,
Have a look at TiddlyDocs
http://hoster.peermore.com/recipes/tiddlydocs-demo/tiddlers.wiki
search TiddlyWeb group for more
regards Mario
On Mar 18, 11:35 pm, twgrp wrote:
> Touched upon many times, but simply not satisfactorily manifested yet:
> TW as a tool for authoring books!
>
> No, I c
On Mar 18, 11:55 pm, PMario wrote:
> Have a look at
> TiddlyDocshttp://hoster.peermore.com/recipes/tiddlydocs-demo/tiddlers.wiki
Thanks! That is interesting and very beautiful! But it seems
especially made for TiddlyWeb... which, as far as I know, is a
different beast than good ol' vanilla TW th
On Mar 19, 1:11 am, Vincent wrote:
> http://twspot.tiddlyspot.com/
>
> http://tiddlytagmindmap.tiddlyspot.com/
I appreciate all input, so thanks.
But Oy! ;-)
That seems as far from linear as you can get, lol! I'm sure it's great
for brainstorming though!
My initial post may have been a bit crypt
Hi,
I like the idea of a linear story line. Thats why I made
SelectStoryMacro[1], and StoryGlueMacro[2] which uses
NavigationMacro[3]. Have a look at my presentation manager [4]. (which
needs some update)
The blue sqares in the main menu are from SelectStoryMacro. A Story is
a set of tiddlers, th
On Mar 19, 5:52 am, Anthony Muscio wrote:
> Always set your order field to something in the hundereds eg; 100 then
> 200 so you will allways be able to insert between them eg; 150 - you
Correct me if I'm wrong, but this sounds like a lot of manual labor
particularly when wanting to re
> I like the idea of a linear story line. Thats why I made
> SelectStoryMacro[1], and StoryGlueMacro[2] which uses
> NavigationMacro[3]. Have a look at my presentation manager [4]. (which
> needs some update)
http://www.TiddlyTools.com/#StorySaverPlugin
<>
<>
<>
<>
<> creates a spa
On Mar 19, 2:34 pm, Eric Weir wrote:
> A question: For getting text, possibly text created and organized in a
> TiddlyWiki, into linear form, what's wrong with an ordinary wordprocessor,
> e.g., Word, OpenOfficeWrite, or Apple's Pages?
> [...]
> TW for composing, wordprocessors for editing.
Edi
Good points! Of course, TW users are a somewhat esoteric group ... so
far.
It seems like a serious barrier to serious publishing is getting the
data -- and formatting -- out. Need to be able to export in something
like RTF, at a minimum, if you want to create a document that a
publisher would be w
On Mar 19, 4:11 pm, PMario wrote:
> [4] http://a-pm.tiddlyspot.com
Ok, let's see if I get this right;
"Topics" are the actual pieces of a story. A story tiddler is defined
as a tiddler that lists all the individual Topics. Inside each such
topic you see a mini navigation display, (the Lewcid Navi
Hi,
On Mar 19, 11:39 pm, twgrp wrote:
> On Mar 19, 4:11 pm, PMario wrote:
>
> > [4]http://a-pm.tiddlyspot.com
>
> Ok, let's see if I get this right;
> "Topics" are the actual pieces of a story. A story tiddler is defined
> as a tiddler that lists all the individual Topics. Inside each such
> top
As someone who probably writes a 3000-1 report on average once a
fortnight and as an ex editor of a professional journal and as a TW
user I am going to add my 10c worth.
Firstly no editor would ever except a TW as manuscript. Most editors
want everything in simple plain text so that they can f
Slightly off topic, but I found this a while back and it relates in
context
http://www.scribd.com/doc/5271682/Organize-Your-Novel-with-a-Wiki
http://www.ljcohen.net/resources-wiki.html
http://www.ljcohen.net/Tiddlywikiwrite-2-5-3.html
I think the power of TW is "currently" in organization more tha
Thank you all for your input so far! You make me realize the scope for
authoring-tools is wider than I considered, dealing with everything
from brain storming, entering content, editing, filtering, assembling,
ordering and re-ordering, content display, overview-issues (ToC,
indexes etc) to features
To clarify and conclude:
The called for concept is simply about a structured way to to turn
selected tiddlers into a sequence (...then to be exported).
In practice, it would mean to able to either start out with an outline
and insert old tiddlers or write new tiddlers into it - or the bottom-
upp
Hi twgrp,
To me it seems that this is more a question about guidelines, "how
to's" and workflows for writing books, essays, papers... rather than
just about specific plugins.
Once you have a clear vision of your desired workflow, it's probably a
rather "simple" matter in tiddlywiki to develop a s
Oh, just realized how many post have been made since I last opened it
(and today found it in a restored browser tab), hehe... little
late. ;o)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlyw...@googlegr
Eric,
surely you need to have some general structure in mind before you hit
twt-treeview-executive or some other form of Dave Gifford's original
notebook idea.
The question then is whether the mind map TW's might be of some use to
generate the ideas and some structure.
I must say I've never got
Didn't someone adapt 'Freemind' or mindmaps to a TW? That would work great
for writing a novel. Get all your different plots going and then waive them
in and out in complex order for final story.
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 4:55 PM, PMario wrote:
> Hi,
> Have a look at TiddlyDocs
> http://hoster.pee
http://twspot.tiddlyspot.com/
http://tiddlytagmindmap.tiddlyspot.com/
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Vincent wrote:
> Didn't someone adapt 'Freemind' or mindmaps to a TW? That would work great
> for writing a novel. Get all your different plots going and then waive them
> in and out in comp
Hi, On Book writing;
I would suggest creating tiddlers and tagging them according to various
criteria - some will form character definitions some just story-lettes.
Tagging allows you to organise in anyway you want.
Now for the linear structure - base it on a heirachy
You could then build a set o
Hi,
TiddlyWikiRoman, von Hartmut Abendschein [1] seems to be German TW novel
ALex
[1] http://bc.etkbooks.com/opac/
On 19 March 2010 04:52, Anthony Muscio wrote:
> Hi, On Book writing;
>
> I would suggest creating tiddlers and tagging them according to various
> criteria - some will form chara
On Mar 19, 2010, at 6:05 AM, Alex Hough wrote:
> TiddlyWikiRoman, von Hartmut Abendschein [1] seems to be German TW novel
May be a counter example to your interest in linear writing. Seems to be a
non-linear novel.
http://davidvanwert.com/die-vampire-die/
I would point out one thing, though.
Hi,
For whatever its worth, I think that the barriers to writing non-linear
works of literature in TW are not comprised of plugins or another technical
aspect. TW is a hypertext tool, and there is a body of work in this field.
It seams that serious writers are not drawn to TiddlyWiki so much as pe
Might I suggest we start with a defined 'wishlist'.
I am assuming we are interested in a novel (not a text book with linear
progression of topics and chapters following a logical sequence).
I'm not a novelist, but if I was to write a book...
1. collect ideas (non-linear)
2. map out a basic story
On Mar 19, 2010, at 4:15 PM, twgrp wrote:
> ...if linearized as late as in the wordprocessor, you'd be forced to
> continually transfer things to get an overview of where you are in the
> composing process.
Perhaps I have not made as much use of TW in composing as I could have. For me
it has pr
On Mar 19, 2010, at 4:21 PM, Mark S. wrote:
> It seems like a serious barrier to serious publishing is getting the
> data -- and formatting -- out. Need to be able to export in something
> like RTF, at a minimum, if you want to create a document that a
> publisher would be willing to consider. Yo
On Mar 19, 2010, at 10:40 PM, twgrp wrote:
> The closest thing so far for a top-down approach in TW seems to be;
> http://twt-treeview-executive.tiddlyspot.com/
> It is top-down because you must define a structure before hand.
In that sense, I would say twt-treeview-executive -- which as I under
On Mar 21, 2010, at 3:56 AM, iain wrote:
> surely you need to have some general structure in mind before you hit
> twt-treeview-executive or some other form of Dave Gifford's original
> notebook idea
Nope. I can start with an arbitrary structure -- a root topic and a few
subtopics named without
I am still inclined towards a mindmapping TW. It does not appear to be very
mature and well worth developing.
Twgrp - I wasn't implying top down approach at all. If you look at the
elements I proposed it is very much bottomup approach with elements
developing much earlier than the final product. P
Vincent et al;
I think you put the requirements rather well. As an interested, but lay
Author this subject is of some interest to me. One of the things I enjoy
doing, and hope I could demonstrate is an ability to conceptualise and
generalise. This is a big part of tiddlywiki's current strength usi
30 matches
Mail list logo
