[tw] Re: Deleting a TiddlySpace so I can start over again

2010-10-13 Thread Saverio
Can someone explain this a little more? I am a heavy TW user, light tiddlyspot user, and new TiddlySpave user. I uploaded my TW to a TiddlySpace as an experiment, liked it, but kept updating my local version. Now I am considering doing all my work on the TiddlySpace version, but i want to replace

[tw] Re: Deleting a TiddlySpace so I can start over again

2010-09-20 Thread dickon
this is a brilliant thought (to have a separate ambit-plugins space within my AMBIT Manual space) - I can see that tiddlySpace (like TiddlyWeb, only moreso) requires a different way of thinking - spaces within spaces within spaces. Cheers Dickon On 20 Sep, 13:23, PMario wrote: > On Sep 20, 1:36

[tw] Re: Deleting a TiddlySpace so I can start over again

2010-09-20 Thread PMario
On Sep 20, 1:36 pm, dickon wrote: ... > If I performed the 'remove all plugins' version, as suggested by > Mario, i am not sure which plugins are 'mine' (from MPTW) and which > ones are from TiddlySpace.  In the TiddlyWeb at Peermore, if I deleted > all of them, then the core TiddlyWeb ones would

[tw] Re: Deleting a TiddlySpace so I can start over again

2010-09-20 Thread dickon
OK - this is partially helpful to my 'low-level' needs! I definitely want to keep the AMBIT name of the space. (Re. keeping the AMBIT name: The idea is that we will keep the private areas of this space for conversation in the AMBIT development group, and for not-yet-finalised drafts of new materi

Re: [tw] Re: Deleting a TiddlySpace so I can start over again

2010-09-20 Thread FND
> Since we're at it, in what respect is... > store.removeTiddler a higher level method than store.getTiddler > (or store.getTiddler higher than store.fetchTiddler) The high-level getTiddler method uses low-level fetchTiddler: http://trac.tiddlywiki.org/browser/Trunk/core/js/TiddlyWiki.js?rev=12238

[tw] Re: Deleting a TiddlySpace so I can start over again

2010-09-20 Thread Tobias Beer
Hi FND, Since we're at it, in what respect is... store.removeTiddler a higher level method than store.getTiddler (or store.getTiddler higher than store.fetchTiddler) ? Why two implementations to begin with? How many more of these "duplicates" are there? I think it were good if an article on tid

Re: [tw] Re: Deleting a TiddlySpace so I can start over again

2010-09-20 Thread FND
> deleted.tiddlyspace.com Seconded. > store.deleteTiddler(t); [...] does no work on tiddlyspace You wanna use the higher-level removeTiddler method, as that's what the ServerSideSavingPlugin hooks into. -- F. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Tidd

[tw] Re: Deleting a TiddlySpace so I can start over again

2010-09-17 Thread Tobias Beer
Hi Dickon, First I thought that you could use a tiny, yet dangerous transclusion which would erase all tiddlers by copying the following into a tiddler and save: <> That however does no work on tiddlyspace... *rolleyes* Maybe someone can tell why this script won't work on tiddlyspace. Cheers,

[tw] Re: Deleting a TiddlySpace so I can start over again

2010-09-17 Thread PMario
Hi, At the moment, there is no simple way, to get rid of many tiddlers. But may be it is not needed. I have an other idea. Goto backstage: plugins select all unselect plugins you need and delete. Now all plugins, uploaded from a file tw. will be deleted. So there should be no side effects anymore.