I experience the same as Mark explains in Firefox on Windows on my best
computer. The unexplainable is, that Firefox on Linux Mint Mate 17.3 on my
10 year old laptop - only 32 bit and with 2gb ram I have no problems at
all. I am synchronizing, so I am rather sure they are used in the same way
FF took memory and didn't give it back. If you read the talk about it blame
was often put on extensions. But extensionless it did the same after a
short while. The memory handling was from the start a mess. Its been used
as a bit of a trojan horse to dump extensions in the process of becoming
c
This is real hoarding though. Giving it more memory would probably make
things worse. Gradually, no matter how many tabs I have open, the total FF
memory grows. Somewhere around 2g it becomes unstable and crashes if I
don't restart first. Typically I need to restart once or twice a day. By
cont
Mark,
On Memory hoarders, for Chrome and Firefox, I recently realised that 90% of
what I do is in browsers, at least with the work on my plate, and my
growing network of tiddlywikis on my desktop class laptop..
As a result I realised I needed the browsers to be first class citizens, as
apps o
On Wednesday, November 8, 2017 at 3:20:23 PM UTC-6, Mark S. wrote:
Even though I've had a twitter account for years, I still don't
understand how it all works. When I go to @Firefox, it's all twinkles and
sunbeams with a few technical questions in between.
I know EXACTLY what you mean. It'
There was ONE thread of great significance in a dev group at Mozilla in
which the "Saving Problem" was debated at length many moons ago. TiddlyWiki
featured in it. It went nowhere. I can't find it now.
Twitter doesn't really have threads unless you elect to reply to a reply.
You just ignore stu
Even though I've had a twitter account for years, I still don't understand
how it all works. When I go to @Firefox, it's all twinkles and sunbeams
with a few technical questions in between. I assume they somehow suppress
any negativity from their followers. Is there a way to see the actual
comm
I already tried and failed.
coda coder wrote:
>
> Condense that to 280 chars and tweet it @Firefox @FirefoxNightly
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
Mark S. wrote:
>
>
> They do promise it will be 2x faster and 33% less memory. My FF is
> definitely a memory hoarder.
>
A faster chrome? Good luck to them keeping any long-term advantage on an
overall approach they fell in bed with.
J.
--
You received this message because you are subscribe
Condense that to 280 chars and tweet it @Firefox @FirefoxNightly
On Wednesday, November 8, 2017 at 12:01:32 PM UTC-6, @TiddlyTweeter wrote:
>
> Cari tutti
>
> I'm looking back. Reluctantly.
>
> The transition of Firefox to 57 marks a point.
>
> The TiddlyWiki issues are the LEAST of it. TW now h
10 matches
Mail list logo
