I actually mean the stackoverflow.com site itself. That site is much easier
to get into and many software libraries use it as their main support
channel.
On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 3:07 AM @TiddlyTweeter
wrote:
> Mohammad: The Q & A idea is okay. Problem is that GG activists are small
> in number &
Mohammad: The Q & A idea is okay. Problem is that GG activists are small in
number & some of us are not Q & A people. For instance, I occasionally like
to make jokes or write rambling investigations which sometimes turn out to
be worth doing even though they are no way Q & A. If it cuts my expre
If we are going to do that, we should really just dust off stackoverflow.com.
Most of the wikitext and javascript related questions could easily be moved
there. More community-related questions such as suggestions and
philosophical think-tank type discussions would continue to happen here. So
would
I fear you are right.
For me dropping GG (with its very significant, deep web history [I was a
tiny part of, I guess]) would tell me NOTHING now can last.
The implication being: whatever: you now need adaptable solutions that can
migrate more easily as it all private companies & we subject to f
ILYA,
I have Bob set up to be multi-user and it would be simple enough to create
a system that can receive email and then make a tiddler out of it to be
either directly added or checked by moderators and then added. As part of
TWederation we made a discussion forum in tiddlywiki which we could
On Friday, October 12, 2018 at 8:27:18 AM UTC-7, @TiddlyTweeter wrote:
>
>
> My general impression is Google feels obligated to it (because of the
> history of how it took over several other services that, essentially,
> previously formed a public domain). Obligated, but doing as little as
> po
ILYA wrote:
>
> It might be crazy idea but would it be possible to use tiddlywiki itself.
>
Its getting closer. Jeremy recently commented something like "we should eat
our own dogfood".
I'm not sure about the list being on TW but meaningful Indices to it,
Example Materials, Plugin "fetching",
You mean this? https://www.reddit.com/r/tiddlywiki
I don't know who created it.
On Friday, October 12, 2018 at 10:37:53 AM UTC-4, Arlen Beiler wrote:
>
> I think the fact that a lot of groups are moving to it is partly an
> indication that it will stay around for a while.
>
> As far as the prici
It might be crazy idea but would it be possible to use tiddlywiki itself.
When email is received the script would create a new tiddler.
Are the any plugins which implement a forum like solution for tw5?
If it doesn't exist how hard it would be to create? It could be useful in other
contexts as
Arlen Beiler wrote:
> Google Groups is free, but Google just announced they are going to close
> Google Plus, so I don't know what will happen with Google Groups. I'm
> actually surprised Google Groups is still around.
>
Since Google is a private company its always possible. BUT I think its
hi
Alternative solution
Question2Answer is a free and open source platform for Q&A sites
I think there is an alternative solution. It is to have a dedicated
platform for question and answer!
One solution is to use the free platform *Question2Answer
*(https://www.question2answer.org/)
and
setup
I think the fact that a lot of groups are moving to it is partly an
indication that it will stay around for a while.
As far as the pricing, I thought that was just for attachments, but that is
a valid concern. Google Groups is free, but Google just announced they are
going to close Google Plus, so
On Friday, October 12, 2018 at 3:52:05 AM UTC-7, @TiddlyTweeter wrote:
>
>
>- Unlike for Yahoo, for GG it would not be able to transfer the
>existing archives. That's a real downside for a route based on
>transitioning. (They write... *"NOTE:* Due to a bug in Google Groups,
>we
Arlen Beiler wondered ...
> Another software community much like TiddlyWiki has been using Yahoo
> Groups for years. Just a few weeks ago they finally moved to groups.io...
> Perhaps it has what we need. I thought the hashtag feature was especially
> interesting.
Ciao Arlen
Very interest
At the meta level, who are these people and how do we know they'll be here
in say, 3 years? Is there a list of groups they're already hosting? Or a
way to review them? Seems like you would want to know how the service has
been working for actual groups at size.
-- Mark
On Thursday, October 11,
Hi Arlen,
Looks interesting. .. The main problem I see is the 1GByte space for the
free product.
10GB are 10$/Month and
1TB are 200$/Month.
see: https://groups.io/static/pricing
--
If I'm reading it right.
The second problem is: It can't import the GG archives. see:
https://gro
16 matches
Mail list logo
