> My vote would go with Mustache (http://mustache.github.com/) which has
> the benefit of cleaner syntax, and more portable templates (it
> supports 21 languages).
>
> > I agree this is a minor point. But every time TiddlyWiki creates its
> > own standard, rather than uses an existing one, it makes
+1 for GitHub from someone who'd like to keep watching and staying involved
with the project on a casual basis; the social and notification features of
GitHub make it suitable for that. Furthermore, the ability to meaningfully
fork and contribute without asking permission are good for any distribut
is-more route which is
> exactly the right behaviour for a presentation. All to often we're
> greeted with a barrage of over-active under-utilised persona courtesy
> of PowerPoint or Keynote. Screw fancy transitions, glitz and
> whatnot...
>
> ..then again I was a big fan
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Paul Downey wrote:
> > On fullscreen mode, I was assuming the current setup is you need to
> switch
> > screen resolution to 800x600, which is working fine for me. I gather
> you're
> > aiming to make it work on any resolution - is that correct?
>
> Fullscreen mode
Thanks for adding those to the list Paul.
> Thanks for the great feedback -- Phil has a few other issues so will
> be sticking my head into TiddlySlidy this week, hopefully will fix up
> fullscreen mode too, which is my personal itch.
>
>
On fullscreen mode, I was assuming the current setup is yo
I've been prepping a talk for JSConf using TiddlySlidy and wanted to pass
some feedback.
Firstly, massive props to Paul Downey (and with contributions from Phil
Hawksworth I presume?) for putting together one of Tiddly*'s holy grails - a
real, working, presentation tool. It's here today and very u
It would be great if everyone involved could get involved tomorrow, as we
more or less have the steel thread in place, but there are various
integration problems which we could easily hit on the head if we're all
working at the same time.
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Paul Downey wrote:
> Just
This is brilliant Fred! Perfect for offline and I imagine easier when
working online too, as it provides a convenient (and easily hackable)
interface for browsing the docs, without having to do any reloads.
On Feb 13, 5:15 pm, Jeremy Ruston wrote:
> Wow, Fred, that's great, genuinely useful alrea
> What will help developers are stronger constraints on what may be
> safely extended, and places to converge, coordinate and agree on
> names and methods crossing between plugins, so that for example,
> my geotagging plugin works with someone else's maps plugin.
> I can see this is starting to hap
Jeremy, this is great news - looking forward to playing with the next-gen
TiddlyWiki.
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Jeremy Ruston wrote:
>
> http://www.tiddlywiki.com/tiddlywiki5/
>
>
Is there a procedure for downloading and running?
I've tried to download and run it in my browser. I download
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 4:14 PM, FND wrote:
> If i call store.saveTiddler(), specifying a value for the
>> fields map paameter, the value is assigned directly rather than being
>> cloned.
>>
>
> This does sound like something that should be addressed. Can you raise a
> ticket (just set the milest
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 12:01 AM, Måns wrote:
> Hi Michael
>
> These are very beautiful and effective verticals and proof of concept
> btw..
> Can ordinary users (like myself, - endusers on the TiddlyWiki group)
> hope to see an overlay/trails-plugin to use with a standard TiddlyWiki
> in a not to
I've done a more fleshed-out proof-of-concept for this now:
http://trail.scrumptious.tv/TrailPlayer.html
explained in a rambling post here:
http://mini.softwareas.com/trails-player-in-tiddlywiki
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
> I was originally thing to just dump into a systemConfig tiddler, but
> after playing with it I think I need a macro. (couldn't get it to
> work . . . )
Probably a good thing - in general, I've learned from others in the TW
community macros are generally the way to go. As a rule of thumb, if
it
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 3:34 PM, FND wrote:
>> As far as resetting stylesheet, I've thought further and
>> experimented, and I realise the solution is a lot simpler: just
>> remove all
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 7:27 PM, FND wrote:
>> a "reset" stylesheet
>
> Since TiddlyWiki defines a fairly large number of rule sets with varying
> specificity, this might become very tricky.
> The easiest approach would be to blank the StyleSheet* shadow tiddlers
> with a simple plugin:
> conf
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 7:27 AM, Craig in Calgary
wrote:
> Has anyone explored creating a TiddlyWiki adaptation that could
> publish tiddlers to standalone HTML files and generate the support
> files (which are not binary), e.g. HLP, HHK, HHC, needed to compile
> the content to CHM? TagglyTagging
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Eric Shulman wrote:
>> The point is to explore how one can make tiddlywiki's that don't look like
>> tiddlywiki - basically, how do you make a TiddlyWiki wth your own HTML
>> and CSS.
>
> Rather than eliminating some of the underlying elements, it's easy
> enough t
I just wrote about a little experiment I made:
http://mini.softwareas.com/silly-video-portal-an-experiment-using-tiddly
The experiment is here:
http://tiddlywiki.mahemoff.com/video.html
The point is to explore how one can make tiddlywiki's that look like
tiddlywiki - basically, how do you make a
I'm not sure if this is a problem or not, but it caused some pain for
me recently. If i call store.saveTiddler(), specifying a value for the
fields map paameter, the value is assigned directly rather than being
cloned.
i.e.:
var fields = { hot: true };
var tid = store.saveTiddler(..., fields,
Hi All,
I did a little experimenting with MHTML last night and found it's
possible to use this technique to embed images in a TiddlyWiki within
IE6. It can be used to complement data: URIs which achieve the same
thing in modern browsers.
http://softwareas.com/embedded-images-in-tiddlywiki-under-
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Eric Shulman wrote:
>
>> > At present, transclusion only allows a list of parameters, which are
>> > declared in the template as $1 to $9. I wonder if there are any plans
>> > to (a) allow named parameters; and (b) support more than 9 parameters.
>> I don't think
http://tiddlywiki.org/wiki/Transclusion
At present, transclusion only allows a list of parameters, which are
declared in the template as $1 to $9. I wonder if there are any plans
to (a) allow named parameters; and (b) support more than 9 parameters.
What I mean by named parameters is something l
When macros go wrong, tiddlywiki shows "Error in macro foo". Is there
a way to make it not do this, so the error bubbles up to the (Firebug)
console as with normal Javascript errors.
Likewise for plugin evaluation?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message b
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Paul Downey
wrote:
>
>> Some people have taken to storing JSON strings in custom fields, but
>> that should be considered a last resort.
>
> That sounds not unlike the jQuery data concept:
>
> http://docs.jquery.com/Core/data
>
> which is of course also untype
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Jonathan Lister
wrote:
> Thanks very much for your efforts! Very much appreciated.
>
Indeed - great to know no code was lost here.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ti
Thanks for your explanations. I didn't explain my problem well enough,
though you've answered my question well enough for me to know that
what I'm seeking isn't possible.
For the record, I'll explain it again in more detail. I've developed
an <> macro to show mediawiki-like info boxes. The tiddly
Is there an option for <>, or some other macro, to just show
the tiddler text, without wrapping it in a tag?
(Use case: I'm making a plugin that reads URLs from slice values.
Normally, it would be a standard HTTP URL, but if it's a long data:
URI, the user might prefer to dump the full data: URI
Hi All, Is there a standard way to cancel the double-click event on
tiddlers in the story, the event which switches the tiddler into Edit
mode?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To
I'm wondering how to emulate the Download button on TiddlyWiki.com for
my own TiddlyWiki verticals, where I've started by downloading
TiddlyWiki and then customised it in some way (by adding plugins or
maybe just by adding content).
As a related question, what exactly does the Download button do
Thanks for the update Chris. The flexible validation model makes sense
- in the medium-to-long term I would also like to see TiddlyWeb ship
with a default validator that allows for general HTML content, that
does the usual Javascript stripping, matching HTML tags, and so on.
Perhaps one that is ea
> As for supported markup, I think headings, lists, italics, monospace and
> links would probably suffice for starters.
External links are essential for comment markup (to reference
documentation, for example).
Does the use of wiki syntax mean that there's a plan for the doco
itself to fit into
This is along the lines of what I'd like to see, but as with FND, I'd
much rather avoid the negative term "santize_unless" if possible, and
have it as "sanitize" instead. I have a hard time getting my head
around "sanitize_unless: NONE".
Also, I had in mind the sanitise algorithm would be flexibl
Hi there. I wrote the drawing plugin - I can see the need for a
completely offline solution and hopefully I can help. BTW if I do
further work on the plugin, I would like to do something similar to
this, where it stores the SVG (and also VML) in the tiddler, so
drawings can be viewed (but not edit
Paul, it would be great if you could then merge in "ck" changes to
"cook"
On Feb 27, 10:32 am, Paul Downey wrote:
> On 27 Feb 2009, at 09:50, mahemoff wrote:
>
>
>
> > Seems like "cook" and "ck" do almost the same thing, but not quit
Seems like "cook" and "ck" do almost the same thing, but not quite.
Couldn't they be folded into a single script?
As I've noted in this ticket - http://trac.tiddlywiki.org/ticket/957 -
"cook" doesn't support the full recipe filename, whereas "ck" does.
--~--~-~--~~~---
I agree with the comments about example applications. A cosmetic thing
perhaps, but it would be nice to see a couple of them hosted with some
real content, on dedicated domains, on port 80 :).
A definitive tutorial and accompanying screencast.
I'd be happy to help with either of those.
--~--~---
Hi,
Is there any argument for which filterTiddlers() will return all
tiddlers (the equivalent store.tiddlers)?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To post to this group, send email
38 matches
Mail list logo
