Hi Leo,
thanks for the kind words, that's inspiring indeed.
пятница, 25 июля 2014 г., 3:46:05 UTC+4 пользователь Leo Staley написал:
>
> Hi Yakov! Thanks so much for making these! Because FeT has such a steep
> learning curve, I still haven't gotten around to learning it and
> implementing it,
Hi Yakov! Thanks so much for making these! Because FeT has such a steep
learning curve, I still haven't gotten around to learning it and
implementing it, but the new features sound nifty. I do wish there were
some form of wysiwyg or helping dialog box for making FeT events(?), that
would show y
Hi,
среда, 23 июля 2014 г., 4:14:14 UTC+4 пользователь ocalTW написал:
>
> Yakov
>
> Strange indeed as I've been using this syntax for some years since TWC
> 2.6.1 or so.
> Moreover I have a good reason to use this syntax: I crafted a simple
> example for the demo, but most of the time the fet i
Yakov
Strange indeed as I've been using this syntax for some years since TWC
2.6.1 or so.
Moreover I have a good reason to use this syntax: I crafted a simple
example for the demo, but most of the time the fet is in a function and I
pass multiple tags as parameters. This is based on the example
Hello ocalTW,
you are welcome; there's a mystake in your syntax:
Hello Yakov
>
> Latest TWC version 2.8.1
> Here are 2 sample very simplecases:
> 1 - Does not work: no output
> < 'tiddler.title+" "' end '""'>>
>
> this should be
<>
(note that systemConfig is surrounded by quotes, but not by squ
Hello Yakov
Latest TWC version 2.8.1
Here are 2 sample very simplecases:
1 - Does not work: no output
<>
2 - Works
<>
I have since replaced all "tiddler.tags.contains" by
"tiddler.tags.containsAny" in all my Tiddlywikis.
No other issues found ever since. So thanks once again.
Regards
On Tuesd
Hello ocalTW,
could you specify the whole syntax that you used? And, more importantly,
the version of TW.
The thing is, indexOf, contains, containsAny, containsAll methods of
Array.prototype were introduced to the TW core in the version 2.4.2, so I
removed them from the plugin (the required Co
Hello Yakov
First of all, many thanks for your FETP work. I use fET *a lot*, and I
tried your FETP right away.
I confirm your about being backward compatible with fET in all cases I have
already tested, except in the following one: when using
"tiddler.tags.contains" in a "where" clause
However
