); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
Hi,
Nigel (Gandalf) has already answered this question very well, but as an
example I'm planning to use mine on a (quite old) Tektronix 602 display.
Other examples are Tek 620 (600 series, but some are storage) and HP
(Agilent)
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
Dear timing colleges,
At CERN we are considering the possibility of using Ethernet as a real
time field bus.
We may use IEEE 1588 to distribute precise UTC and Ethernet Powerlink or
a similar home made product to guarantee
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
Pablo Alvarez Sanchez wrote:
Dear timing colleges,
At CERN we are considering the possibility of using Ethernet as a real
time field bus.
We may use IEEE 1588 to distribute precise UTC and Ethernet Powerlink or
a
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
One thing that comes to mind, though I may be missing something here.
Ethernet is CDMA/CA; would you not loose phase lock during a collision
because of a corrupted carrier?
___
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
From: Jack Hudler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Timing on Ethernet
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 07:38:35 -0500
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
One
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
Looking at the IEEE 1588 while implementing in your own FPGA seems
like an odd choice. It is an option, but you could fairly easy cook
up something which fits your needs. It is not too hard actually.
The main reason that
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
First of all thanks a lot for your answers.
For a facility like CERN, I think that normal cabel
assymetries will be sufficiently low such that they would not
require explicit handling, unless you have higher
From: Pablo Alvarez Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Timing on Ethernet (Magnus Danielson)
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 18:25:58 +0200
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Pablo,
First of all thanks a lot for your answers.
Thanks.
For a facility like CERN, I think that normal cabel
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
In a message dated 03/08/2007 15:11:29 GMT Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
I think you mean Most *analog* scopes can be used in X-Y display mode. I
have not looked closely, but I do not remember seeing X-Y mode
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
Hi Didier
I have a low cost DSO, the HP 54600 Jedi, and it has an X-Y mode (as well as a
Roll mode which emulates a strip chart recorder at very low time/div
settings). Now how well it would work in this application would be
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
All,
I tried it with a DSO scope in XY mode a while back (7201? - can't recall the
model, but it's 3-4 years old.)
After some playing about with the controls, it worked acceptably. The general
problem with it was getting
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
Over at TVB's place the other night, we tried the clock on his
TDS3000B-series DPO and it worked fine with a bit of knob-twiddling. The
cheaper TDS2000-series DSO in the recent Make magazine article photos also
seemed to do
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
I think you mean Most *analog* scopes can be used in X-Y display mode. I
have not looked closely, but I do not remember seeing X-Y mode on a DSO,
even though I am sure the high end models support it.
Didier KO4BB
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
You could go on the HP reflector to see if anyone can help. However, Agilent
has about 90% of all of the old HP manuals (operating/service) in the
archives on their web site. They also have most of the old app. notes. There
is
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
On Friday 03 August 2007 07:22, Pablo Alvarez Sanchez wrote:
At CERN we are considering the possibility of using Ethernet as a real
time field bus.
There are a couple of projects that have already gone down this road,
for
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
Thanks Magnus, I guess I was dating myself :).
Pablo, is this going to be used for timing throughout the entire CERN site
or just instrumentation on 27km LHC?
If it's just the LHC then what about using an open fiber/copper
16 matches
Mail list logo
