Re: [time-nuts] WWVB Response

2012-09-27 Thread David I. Emery
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:16:45AM -0700, J. Forster wrote: > The bandwidth is secondary. The time-domain response of the filter is the > issue. Seems clear that you need a reasonably wide preselection filter to avoid this problem, maybe as someone suggests several hundred or more hz to re

Re: [time-nuts] WWVB Now a Monopoly

2012-09-27 Thread Majdi S. Abbas
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 07:38:03AM +0200, b...@lysator.liu.se wrote: > Dont you have GPS/Cs locked cell networks anymore in the US? > > http://www.endruntechnologies.com/cdma.htm Björn, Past experience with CDMA TOD references here is that they fare much worse than WWVB TOD refer

Re: [time-nuts] WWVB Now a Monopoly

2012-09-27 Thread bg
Dont you have GPS/Cs locked cell networks anymore in the US? http://www.endruntechnologies.com/cdma.htm -- Björn > In the real world, if GPS does not work, the WWVB change means you either > have to buy the XW stuff or go do something else. > > YMMV > > -John > > = > > > >>

[time-nuts] WWVB Receiver Comments

2012-09-27 Thread johncroos
For David - re WWVB carrier recovery. On squaring vs absolute values for carrier recovery. Never heard of using absolute value. As I said in my initial remarks - some perusal of the prior art is helpful for this problem. There are 70 years of literature on how to do this for any imaginable

Re: [time-nuts] BPSK Receiver & GPS Antenna siting

2012-09-27 Thread Magnus Danielson
On 09/28/2012 01:34 AM, Bob Camp wrote: Hi A PLL locks to phase. If the phase switches by 180 degrees, the phase tracking switches signs. There's no way to track that. You either need to double the frequency (and thus eliminate the modulation) or demodulate the signal and lock to the result.

Re: [time-nuts] BPSK Receiver & GPS Antenna siting

2012-09-27 Thread J. Forster
The required height to get a usable view of the sky sometimes is just not practical. In reading XW's stuff, it looks to me like they are essentially and intentionally repurposing WWVB from a standard of time interval, to a distribution vehicle for TOD. YMMV, -John > Haha, the

Re: [time-nuts] BPSK Receiver & GPS Antenna siting

2012-09-27 Thread David
I have been thinking about this problem on and off over the last couple of days. Would it be better to take the absolute value rather than squaring the signal? I might try some tricky but impractical analog sampling and/or synchronous demodulation recovery method but the Costas loop looks awfully

Re: [time-nuts] BPSK Receiver & GPS Antenna siting

2012-09-27 Thread J. Forster
Except, in many places, flagpoles are not permitted. -John == > Flagpoles need caps, right? A GPS antenna would be just perfect. And a > fiberglass flagpole could hide a significant HF vertical! > > > > > On 9/27/2012 10:24 PM, Randy D. Hunt wrote: >>> >> >> Put up a flagpole. >> >>

Re: [time-nuts] Why the fuss?

2012-09-27 Thread J. Forster
Comming soon to a voting booth near you. YMMV, -John == > And don't get me started on "Smart Growth", the International Council for > Local Environmental Initiatives and Agenda 21. > > All designed to move us into dense urban living conditions with fixed mass > transit and odious

Re: [time-nuts] BPSK Receiver & GPS Antenna siting

2012-09-27 Thread Randy D. Hunt
On 9/27/2012 7:27 PM, Peter Gottlieb wrote: Flagpoles need caps, right? A GPS antenna would be just perfect. And a fiberglass flagpole could hide a significant HF vertical! On 9/27/2012 10:24 PM, Randy D. Hunt wrote: Put up a flagpole. Randy, KI6WAS ___

Re: [time-nuts] WWVB Format Ownership

2012-09-27 Thread Orin Eman
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Peter Gottlieb wrote: > Not quite sure about the analog to health care, but certainly a > transmission being public domain doesn't mean much if the only possible way > to use it is proprietary. Sounds like something Microsoft would strive for. > I think Apple a

Re: [time-nuts] Why the fuss?

2012-09-27 Thread DaveH
And don't get me started on "Smart Growth", the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives and Agenda 21. All designed to move us into dense urban living conditions with fixed mass transit and odious rules as to what kind of light bulb we can use, what kind of toilet we can install,

Re: [time-nuts] BPSK Receiver & GPS Antenna siting

2012-09-27 Thread Peter Gottlieb
Flagpoles need caps, right? A GPS antenna would be just perfect. And a fiberglass flagpole could hide a significant HF vertical! On 9/27/2012 10:24 PM, Randy D. Hunt wrote: Put up a flagpole. Randy, KI6WAS ___ _

Re: [time-nuts] BPSK Receiver & GPS Antenna siting

2012-09-27 Thread Randy D. Hunt
On 9/27/2012 4:20 PM, Bob Camp wrote: Hi At least in my back yard, a 6' tall tripod would be very noticeable from a number of directions. There are many others in similar situations. If I were to interpret the restrictions literally as written, an antenna that was inside the house, but visibl

Re: [time-nuts] WWVB Format Ownership

2012-09-27 Thread Peter Gottlieb
Not quite sure about the analog to health care, but certainly a transmission being public domain doesn't mean much if the only possible way to use it is proprietary. Sounds like something Microsoft would strive for. On 9/27/2012 9:57 PM, WB6BNQ wrote: The transmitted format on WWVB (and for

[time-nuts] WWVB Format Ownership

2012-09-27 Thread WB6BNQ
The transmitted format on WWVB (and for that matter on the WWV HF stations) is owned by the government and thus the "PEOPLE." As stated to me, John Lowe (WWVB Broadcast Manager) claims he is the person who has designed and is implementing this new broadcast format. Because he is a paid employee of

Re: [time-nuts] Why the fuss?

2012-09-27 Thread J. Forster
Absolutely! Often as not, a bunch of new rules and regulations are "bundled" with some popular measure. The popular measure gets the press, the rest of the package gets ignored. That happens at all levels of government. Purposely so. -John === > HI > > …. and if you believe that t

Re: [time-nuts] BPSK Receiver & GPS Antenna siting

2012-09-27 Thread J. Forster
Bob, Thanks for the nice, concise, summary of the screwing the new WWVB format will inflict on the timing community, especially because LORAN-C is dead. The only "benefit" to the NIST/XW scheme I can see is creating a monopoly for Xtendwave in precision TOD marketplace for those not relying on GP

Re: [time-nuts] Why the fuss?

2012-09-27 Thread Bob Camp
HI …. and if you believe that these sort of restrictions are passed one at a time locally.. not so much. The "easy way" is for your local government to simply adopt an "up to date" package of rules. Rarely do any of those voting understand what in the package. Rarely does the vote get anything

Re: [time-nuts] Lady Heather on a Laptop

2012-09-27 Thread Chris Albertson
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Charles P. Steinmetz wrote: > Chris wrote: > >> After some measuring my general run of thumb is "Anything you >> leave plugged in and running 24x7 will cost you triple digits of >> dollars (at least) over a year > > > Well, that's a lot of "anything." Maybe I shou

Re: [time-nuts] Why the fuss?

2012-09-27 Thread J. Forster
If you are under the impression living in an older, built up area will be a defense against those with a Martha Stewart fetish, you are wrong. -John > > > Well, that's what I love about the SF bay area- lots of old neighborhoods > that didn't have all these silly restrictions

Re: [time-nuts] Why the fuss?

2012-09-27 Thread Peter Gottlieb
Title restrictions, once put into place, can be extremely tricky to remove. On 9/27/2012 7:36 PM, Bob Camp wrote: Hi The gotcha isn't the neighbors (who you can negotiate with) it's what ever entity enforces the title restrictions. With the recent dip in sales, that may be the original devel

Re: [time-nuts] BPSK Receiver & GPS Antenna siting

2012-09-27 Thread Bob Camp
Hi Ok, to *try* to bring this back together. There is indeed a valid Time Nuts need for something other than GPS. In reality there are many reasons. One that has not been mentioned is to check on the validity of your long term GPS time estimate Small errors that accumulate can be a really nas

Re: [time-nuts] BPSK Receiver & GPS Antenna siting

2012-09-27 Thread Peter Gottlieb
Until I move into the house I'm getting I'm in a rental condo where absolutely no antennas are permitted. It's a building and I'm on the 4th floor so have done things like ran a very thin wire out one window to a far one, a wire with a weight nearly to the ground, a rather long wire (#26 strand

Re: [time-nuts] WWVB / Xtendwave patents

2012-09-27 Thread Dennis Ferguson
On 27 Sep, 2012, at 15:40 , Jim Lux wrote: > On 9/27/12 2:58 PM, Bob Camp wrote: >> Hi >> >> It would be interesting to hear what the patent lawyers on the list think >> about the patents. Given a quick read, they appear to cover any use of the >> specific transmitted format for receiving time

[time-nuts] Hiding GPS antennas

2012-09-27 Thread Gregory Muir
Haven't had a single problem with my GPS antennas at my home and all of my sites for nearly 8 years now. They work well up inside the building by the wooden roof ridge even with 10-20 inches of snow on top in the winter time. G ___ time-nuts mailing l

Re: [time-nuts] Why the fuss?

2012-09-27 Thread d . seiter
Well, that's what I love about the SF bay area- lots of old neighborhoods that didn't have all these silly restrictions in place when they were built.  There are the "usual" CC&Rs, like I can raise chickens, but not cows, but it doesn't mandate what three colors you can paint your house, or th

Re: [time-nuts] Why the fuss?

2012-09-27 Thread Bob Camp
Hi ….. and as long as C&R's are not something the FCC is going to play with -- you are stuck. Bob On Sep 27, 2012, at 8:09 PM, David wrote: > Presumably such a strategy would be applied against a HOA that has > power over the restrictions. > > I have not been following this subject for seve

Re: [time-nuts] Why the fuss?

2012-09-27 Thread David
Presumably such a strategy would be applied against a HOA that has power over the restrictions. I have not been following this subject for several years but apparently the FCC has released the report authorized by congress in 2012 and again found no need to take action: http://transition.fcc.gov/

Re: [time-nuts] BPSK Receiver & GPS Antenna siting

2012-09-27 Thread Jim Lux
On 9/27/12 4:34 PM, Bob Camp wrote: Hi A PLL locks to phase. If the phase switches by 180 degrees, the phase tracking switches signs. There's no way to track that. You either need to double the frequency (and thus eliminate the modulation) or demodulate the signal and lock to the result. If y

Re: [time-nuts] BPSK Receiver & GPS Antenna siting

2012-09-27 Thread J. Forster
You cannot put a narrow filter before the squarer for reasons previously cited. In a low S/N area, squaring just makes matters worse wrt dynamic range and clipping. -John == > Hi > > A PLL locks to phase. If the phase switches by 180 degrees, the phase > tracking switches signs. There'

Re: [time-nuts] Why the fuss?

2012-09-27 Thread Bob Camp
Hi The gotcha isn't the neighbors (who you can negotiate with) it's what ever entity enforces the title restrictions. With the recent dip in sales, that may be the original developer, still there a decade later …. Bob On Sep 27, 2012, at 7:30 PM, David wrote: > On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 18:59:48 -

Re: [time-nuts] BPSK Receiver & GPS Antenna siting

2012-09-27 Thread Bob Camp
Hi A PLL locks to phase. If the phase switches by 180 degrees, the phase tracking switches signs. There's no way to track that. You either need to double the frequency (and thus eliminate the modulation) or demodulate the signal and lock to the result. If you simply put up a real narrow filter

Re: [time-nuts] WWVB Now a Monopoly

2012-09-27 Thread J. Forster
In the real world, if GPS does not work, the WWVB change means you either have to buy the XW stuff or go do something else. YMMV -John = > On 9/26/12 7:11 PM, J. Forster wrote: >> But if someone here designed and built a $100 receiver and offered it to >> the group, that could

Re: [time-nuts] Why the fuss?

2012-09-27 Thread David
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 18:59:48 -0400, Jeff Stevens wrote: >On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Hal Murray wrote: >> What do hams do in that environment? > >Hams either avoid HOAs and deed restricted property or they live with >the restrictions by placing their antennas in attics and other >inconspicu

Re: [time-nuts] BPSK Receiver & GPS Antenna siting

2012-09-27 Thread Bob Camp
Hi At least in my back yard, a 6' tall tripod would be very noticeable from a number of directions. There are many others in similar situations. If I were to interpret the restrictions literally as written, an antenna that was inside the house, but visible through an open window is also a viola

[time-nuts] BPSK Receiver & GPS Antenna siting

2012-09-27 Thread johncroos
Various comments - Hal mentioned SNR for the scheme I suggested. A PLL can be a coherent demodulator of arbitrary bandwidth. Thus the PLL at the output of the doubler can have a small bandwidth since at that point there is no PSK, it having been removed by the doubler. So given a stable VCXO y

Re: [time-nuts] Why the fuss?

2012-09-27 Thread Randy D. Hunt
On 9/27/2012 2:06 PM, Bob Camp wrote: Hi Hit send to soon. The title stuff comes from the developer not the builder. All the developers seem to subscribe to the same newsletter that comes up with a standard set of "stuff" to add to the title. Bob -Original Message- From: time-nuts-bou

Re: [time-nuts] Why the fuss?

2012-09-27 Thread Jeff Stevens
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Hal Murray wrote: > What do hams do in that environment? Hams either avoid HOAs and deed restricted property or they live with the restrictions by placing their antennas in attics and other inconspicuous locations. There have been attempts by hams to get the FCC

Re: [time-nuts] Lady Heather on a Laptop

2012-09-27 Thread Jim Lux
On 9/27/12 3:10 PM, Charles P. Steinmetz wrote: Chris wrote: In another post you mentioned $0.21/kWH (you must be in California?), so adjust all of these by a factor of 2.625 for your location -- but I think the service rates in most of the US are closer to ours than to yours). A lot of ar

Re: [time-nuts] Lady Heather on a Laptop

2012-09-27 Thread Peter Gottlieb
Most recent bill in MA: Supply is 6.72 cents/kWh and delivery is 6.60 cents/kWn for a total of 13.32 cents/kWh. This is much less than I was paying in NY where it was hovering around 30 cents/kWh (I remember 32 one summer month). Peter On 9/27/2012 6:10 PM, Charles P. Steinmetz wrote: Chr

Re: [time-nuts] WWVB Now a Monopoly

2012-09-27 Thread Jim Lux
On 9/26/12 7:11 PM, J. Forster wrote: But if someone here designed and built a $100 receiver and offered it to the group, that could well violate some of their IP. As to building a home brew receiver and certifying a onsie so your lab's cal is traceable, I'd certainly not trust a cal done that w

Re: [time-nuts] Why the fuss?

2012-09-27 Thread Bob Camp
HI At least as written, the restrictions allow the microwave dish but do prohibit the UHF/VHF antenna. Bob On Sep 27, 2012, at 6:42 PM, Jim Lux wrote: > On 9/27/12 10:02 AM, Bob Camp wrote: >> Hi >> >> Right here in PA for one. You essentially can not buy a new house without >> there being

Re: [time-nuts] Lady Heather on Laptop

2012-09-27 Thread Jerry
Thanks for the tips. I am using latest verison 3.10. Also sorry that I did not describe the problem clearly. I see the seconds ticking by nicely but then every 20-30 seconds, the 'seconds' number freezes for a few seconds and then the display races through and catches up. Sounds like a backgroun

Re: [time-nuts] Why the fuss?

2012-09-27 Thread Jim Lux
On 9/27/12 10:02 AM, Bob Camp wrote: Hi Right here in PA for one. You essentially can not buy a new house without there being various conditions written into the title. One universal one is "no antennas". The only exception is for one 19" sat dish for TV, since that's a federal mandate. Actua

Re: [time-nuts] WWVB / Xtendwave patents

2012-09-27 Thread Jim Lux
On 9/27/12 2:58 PM, Bob Camp wrote: Hi It would be interesting to hear what the patent lawyers on the list think about the patents. Given a quick read, they appear to cover any use of the specific transmitted format for receiving time information. IANAL, but.. reading Claim 1.. a key aspects

Re: [time-nuts] WWVB PM Receiver

2012-09-27 Thread Jim Lux
On 9/27/12 7:23 AM, J. Forster wrote: Jim, What you are suggesting is essentially a spread spectrum system where the chip pattern is time varient. IMO, this is an incredible kludge. And, there is no gurantee that the algorythm for generating the chip pattern will not change down the road. I

Re: [time-nuts] Lady Heather on a Laptop

2012-09-27 Thread Charles P. Steinmetz
Chris wrote: After some measuring my general run of thumb is "Anything you leave plugged in and running 24x7 will cost you triple digits of dollars (at least) over a year Well, that's a lot of "anything." There are 8760 hours in a year, so a 1 kW load will consume 8760 kWH per year. We pay

Re: [time-nuts] WWVB Response

2012-09-27 Thread Bob Camp
HI Wasn't the original question about the transmitted bandwidth? If not, then I answered the wrong question. I am indeed very interested in what the transmitted bandwidth actually is. Bob On Sep 27, 2012, at 2:48 PM, J. Forster wrote: > In this area, you cannot get the BW down enough for a u

Re: [time-nuts] WWVB / Xtendwave patents

2012-09-27 Thread Bob Camp
Hi It would be interesting to hear what the patent lawyers on the list think about the patents. Given a quick read, they appear to cover any use of the specific transmitted format for receiving time information. Bob On Sep 27, 2012, at 2:54 PM, Scott Newell wrote: > Looks like one has issued

Re: [time-nuts] Why the fuss?

2012-09-27 Thread Bob Camp
Hi Hit send to soon. The title stuff comes from the developer not the builder. All the developers seem to subscribe to the same newsletter that comes up with a standard set of "stuff" to add to the title. Bob -Original Message- From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...

Re: [time-nuts] Why the fuss?

2012-09-27 Thread Bob Camp
Hi I *wish* it was that simple. Around here the HOA isn't the issue. The crud is put in the title by the builder.. Bob -Original Message- From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of d.sei...@comcast.net Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 4:34 PM To:

Re: [time-nuts] Why the fuss?

2012-09-27 Thread J. Forster
Earth to Dave: Sometimes laws and regulations change years after you buy a piece of property or do something perfectly legal. Nobody is safe whenever (Congress, Agency, State Legislature, Town Council, governing body, or whatever) is in session. YMMV, -John === > > > These are amoun

Re: [time-nuts] Why the fuss?

2012-09-27 Thread d . seiter
These are amoung other reasons why I will never buy a house in a development or with a HOA. -Dave - Original Message - From: "Bob Camp" To: j...@quikus.com, "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 11:36:23 AM Subject: Re:

Re: [time-nuts] WWVB PM Receiver

2012-09-27 Thread Hal Murray
johncr...@aol.com said: > So it should be possible to implement a receiver without infringing any > patents and without reams of signal processing code. How well would your scheme work with poor signal/noise? Some of us consider "reams of signal processing code" to be as much fun as wiring up

Re: [time-nuts] WWVB / Xtendwave patents

2012-09-27 Thread paul swed
Useful Thanks. What I do not see coming out is anything to help create a local corrected 60 Khz sig. It seems to only be about time. On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Scott Newell wrote: > Looks like one has issued (8,270,465). Application 20120082008 appears to > be relevant as well. > > http://

[time-nuts] WWVB Receiver

2012-09-27 Thread johncroos
To Paul re my receiver thoughts. You are absolutely correct in some regards and for some implementations. The limiter must have very high dynamic range and must not convert changes in input level to changes in transmission phase; i.e. No AM to PM conversions. Thus my specific suggestion of

[time-nuts] WWVB / Xtendwave patents

2012-09-27 Thread Scott Newell
Looks like one has issued (8,270,465). Application 20120082008 appears to be relevant as well. http://www.google.com/patents/US8270465 http://www.google.com/patents/US20120082008 ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go t

Re: [time-nuts] WWVB Response

2012-09-27 Thread J. Forster
In this area, you cannot get the BW down enough for a usable signal without killing the time response to the BPSK transitions. YMMV, -John > Hi > > I suspect the bandwidth is > 1 Hz, since they want to get the data bits to > reliably flip within a second. I'm sure the bandwidt

Re: [time-nuts] Low power timekeeping

2012-09-27 Thread David McGaw
It is not a matter of skin depth. Skin depth relates to a dissipative process like EM waves traveling into/through a resistive medium. Soil and rock are not dissipative to heat in this way. There is a poor impedance match between the air and the soil but once into the ground, through soil and

Re: [time-nuts] WWVB Response

2012-09-27 Thread Bob Camp
Hi I suspect the bandwidth is > 1 Hz, since they want to get the data bits to reliably flip within a second. I'm sure the bandwidth is limited for a number of reasons. Bob -Original Message- From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of paul swed Sent

Re: [time-nuts] Why the fuss?

2012-09-27 Thread Bob Camp
Hi and indeed many of the "likely hiding places" are also on the list of things you are not supposed to do. Bob -Original Message- From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of J. Forster Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 2:20 PM To: Discussion o

Re: [time-nuts] WWVB PM Receiver

2012-09-27 Thread J. Forster
Been tried. Doewn't work. Among other things, if you multiply by 2 and then divide by two, you can have extra flips or missed flips. A Miller Divider has the same issue. .. Interesting that you should bring up TV. A REQUIREMENT of the conversion from B&W to color was compatability with t

Re: [time-nuts] Why the fuss?

2012-09-27 Thread J. Forster
Vent pipes are not usually 20-30 feet tall. -John = > Which for all intents and purposes means "nothing that looks like an > antenna > to John Q. Public". What if your GPS antenna looked like a vent pipe? or a > Bird House? It may be difficult to hide a decent HF antenna, But, a 1.5

Re: [time-nuts] WWVB Response

2012-09-27 Thread J. Forster
The bandwidth is secondary. The time-domain response of the filter is the issue. -John = > > j...@quikus.com said: >> The AM just makes the situation in low S/N areas worse. The BPSK wipes >> out >> the possibility of any very narrow band prefiltering, because of filter >> time >> r

[time-nuts] Lady Heather on Laptop

2012-09-27 Thread Mark Sims
That type of behavior is almost always related to the driver for the USB converter.--I am using a dedicated fast pro9cessor laptop but Lady heather seems to slo9w down and every 20-30 seconds I can see it race through the seconds to catch up.

Re: [time-nuts] WWVB PM Receiver

2012-09-27 Thread paul swed
John Like your thoughts and have exactly tried all that you say over the last 6 months. The div / 2 is a big issue because of the fades and noise. It really does not work. Now if you are in the 1000uv contour it most likely mostly will. By the way limiting was a nightmare. Regards Paul. On Thu, Se

Re: [time-nuts] WWVB Response

2012-09-27 Thread paul swed
less then 10 hz and more like 1 On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Hal Murray wrote: > > j...@quikus.com said: > > The AM just makes the situation in low S/N areas worse. The BPSK wipes > out > > the possibility of any very narrow band prefiltering, because of filter > time > > response. > > What

Re: [time-nuts] Why the fuss?

2012-09-27 Thread Tom Miller
Under other issues, I have one where GPS could not be used. It was at a UHF TV station where the third harmonic fell right in the L1 band. A 220,000 watt UHF transmitter driving a gain antenna for 5 MW EIRP will always produce some third harmonic near the antenna. There was no access to GPS wit

Re: [time-nuts] WWVB PM Receiver

2012-09-27 Thread johncroos
Hello All - I am new to this forum but have read it for a couple of years. The present fulminations on the WWVB format change should be reconsidered in the light of prior art. As an old RfFengineer I do not see any issue with the format and the business about patents is not really applicable as th

Re: [time-nuts] Why the fuss?

2012-09-27 Thread Dale J. Robertson
Which for all intents and purposes means "nothing that looks like an antenna to John Q. Public". What if your GPS antenna looked like a vent pipe? or a Bird House? It may be difficult to hide a decent HF antenna, But, a 1.5 GHz antenna can be virtually invisible. Dale NV8U -Original Messag

Re: [time-nuts] Why the fuss?

2012-09-27 Thread Hal Murray
li...@rtty.us said: > Right here in PA for one. You essentially can not buy a new house without > there being various conditions written into the title. One universal one is > "no antennas". The only exception is for one 19" sat dish for TV, since > that's a federal mandate. Interesting. Thanks

Re: [time-nuts] WWVB Response

2012-09-27 Thread Hal Murray
j...@quikus.com said: > The AM just makes the situation in low S/N areas worse. The BPSK wipes out > the possibility of any very narrow band prefiltering, because of filter time > response. What is the bandwidth of the transmitted signal? -- These are my opinions. I hate spam. __

Re: [time-nuts] Low power timekeeping

2012-09-27 Thread Alan Melia
Hi Chris when the British Post Office (later BT) ran radio stations, the station standard was usually in a hole 30 feet deep. Crystals were made in our own "Factory", a section of the Research department, so the crystals would have been cut to suit UK conditions. Maintaining systems were usually

Re: [time-nuts] Why the fuss?

2012-09-27 Thread Bob Camp
Hi Right here in PA for one. You essentially can not buy a new house without there being various conditions written into the title. One universal one is "no antennas". The only exception is for one 19" sat dish for TV, since that's a federal mandate. Bob -Original Message- From: time-nu

[time-nuts] Why the fuss?

2012-09-27 Thread Gregory Muir
In my business we term it "analysis paralysis." Greg With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine... On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 07:29:46 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: I cannot think of a time-nuts WWVB reference requirement that cannot be better satisfied with a GPSDO. Will NIST publis

Re: [time-nuts] Lady Heather on a Laptop

2012-09-27 Thread gary
It is Kill-A-Watt if you go looking for one. http://www.p3international.com/products/special/P4400/P4400-CE.html Highly recommended product. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/l

Re: [time-nuts] Lady Heather on a Laptop

2012-09-27 Thread Chris Albertson
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 9:07 AM, brent evers wrote: > If you get one with three sata ports (more than two usually comes with > four though), plug in three drives - one for the OS and applications, > and two data configured to run as a mirrored raid array - makes a > cheap and easy file server.. I

Re: [time-nuts] Lady Heather on Laptop

2012-09-27 Thread jim s
On 9/27/2012 4:07 AM, Jerry wrote: I am using a dedicated fast pro9cessor laptop but Lady heather seems to slo9w down and every 20-30 seconds I can see it race through the seconds to catch up. There are some system and version suggestions posted in other replies. Another thing that happens is

Re: [time-nuts] Lady Heather on a Laptop

2012-09-27 Thread Chris Albertson
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:52 AM, gary wrote: > I use a dual core atom as a server. Be sure to read the user reviews on > Newegg regarding memory. If you try to stuff your Atom to the full 4gbytes, > only certain sodimms work. You can use the smallest SSDs around for this > purpose. I built mine wi

Re: [time-nuts] Lady Heather on a Laptop

2012-09-27 Thread brent evers
If you get one with three sata ports (more than two usually comes with four though), plug in three drives - one for the OS and applications, and two data configured to run as a mirrored raid array - makes a cheap and easy file server.. I haven't done this but plan to (maybe I'll do that this weeke

Re: [time-nuts] Lady Heather on a Laptop

2012-09-27 Thread gary
I use a dual core atom as a server. Be sure to read the user reviews on Newegg regarding memory. If you try to stuff your Atom to the full 4gbytes, only certain sodimms work. You can use the smallest SSDs around for this purpose. I built mine with an 80gBbyte intel. I use win 7 pro 64 bit for

Re: [time-nuts] Low power timekeeping

2012-09-27 Thread Chris Albertson
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Hal Murray wrote: > >> As you go deeper you get a delayed history of the surface temperature. > > Right. Skin depth. > > >> A good oven runs rings around deep earth stability. > > But a hole in the ground doesn't take any power. > That was my point. At some de

Re: [time-nuts] Lady Heather on a Laptop

2012-09-27 Thread REEVES Paul
atom based mini-ITX boards are available from ~60GBP (low-end, ~1.2GHz) to about ~140GBP (dual-core + loads of I/O). Not looked recently as I've got all I need (at the moment). Situation your side of the pond should be similar. Not expensive. regards, Paul G8GJA -Original Message-

Re: [time-nuts] Lady Heather on a Laptop

2012-09-27 Thread Bob Bownes
I run an XP VM in either VirtualBox (under linux) or Parallels (on my mac) to do the same thing. Works like a charm. Bob On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:00 AM, paul swed wrote: > My I like your approach. > Now I have to go see what all of this might cost. > On vmware are you running esxi?? > Suspec

Re: [time-nuts] Lady Heather on a Laptop

2012-09-27 Thread Chris Albertson
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:00 AM, paul swed wrote: > My I like your approach. > Now I have to go see what all of this might cost. > On vmware are you running esxi?? > Suspect the atoms are costly No. It cheap. An Intel motherboard with an Atom CPU soldered down to it (Atom does not use a socket)

Re: [time-nuts] Lady Heather on a Laptop

2012-09-27 Thread paul swed
My I like your approach. Now I have to go see what all of this might cost. On vmware are you running esxi?? Suspect the atoms are costly Regards Paul WB8TSL On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Chris Albertson wrote: > I have an Intel Atom powered box that runs Linux. These Atom CPUs use > so litt

[time-nuts] GPS corrected wrist watches

2012-09-27 Thread Raj
Anyone seen or own a Seiko Astron wrist watch or an other brand ? Any opinion on these new generation of wrist watches? Cheers -- Raj, VU2ZAP Bangalore, India. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.

Re: [time-nuts] Lady Heather on a Laptop

2012-09-27 Thread Chris Albertson
I have an Intel Atom powered box that runs Linux. These Atom CPUs use so little power they don't put fans on the CPU heat sinks. I run VMware on Linux and then Windows XP inside the virtual PC. LH runs on Windows in the virtual machine. I have removed the monitor, keyboard and mouse. The entir

Re: [time-nuts] WWVB Response

2012-09-27 Thread Clint Turner
While there could have been a few things to make the WWVB transmissions easier to recover with low S/N, keeping them compatible with the "legacy" time-only receivers was somewhat of a hindrance. Unlike the DCF77 signal - which has a digital phase modulation that does NOT really lend itself to

Re: [time-nuts] Why the fuss?

2012-09-27 Thread brent evers
Zoning, Legal? Where? Brent On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:41 AM, J. Forster wrote: > Because: > > LORAN-C is gone. > > Not all can use GPS because of siting, horizon, zoning, legal, and other > issues. Not everyone can erect antenna towers. > > There is nothing else, except perhaps WWV or CHU on H

Re: [time-nuts] Why the fuss?

2012-09-27 Thread J. Forster
Because: LORAN-C is gone. Not all can use GPS because of siting, horizon, zoning, legal, and other issues. Not everyone can erect antenna towers. There is nothing else, except perhaps WWV or CHU on HF. -John == > I cannot think of a time-nuts WWVB reference requirement > tha

[time-nuts] Why the fuss?

2012-09-27 Thread Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R
I cannot think of a time-nuts WWVB reference requirement that cannot be better satisfied with a GPSDO. Will NIST publish a public domain reference circuit? That would allay patent concerns. -- Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R c...@omen.com www.omen.com Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for E

Re: [time-nuts] Lady Heather on a Laptop

2012-09-27 Thread Alan Melia
Mike some of the early laptops from this vintage switch the backlight off if closed but stay running, I used this for some 24/7 logging.you may even be able to get an old junk screen Alan G3NYK - Original Message - From: "Michael Baker" To: Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 2:

Re: [time-nuts] WWVB PM Receiver

2012-09-27 Thread J. Forster
Jim, What you are suggesting is essentially a spread spectrum system where the chip pattern is time varient. IMO, this is an incredible kludge. And, there is no gurantee that the algorythm for generating the chip pattern will not change down the road. YMMV, -John == > On 9/2

Re: [time-nuts] WWVB Response

2012-09-27 Thread J. Forster
Probably so. Which leaves two alternatives: Build a receiver anyway. XW will likely wait unitl it starts making money... then sue. A typical strategy. or Try to get a license and pay through the nose. Once again, we see the government picking winners and losers. How has that worked out for th

Re: [time-nuts] WWVB Response

2012-09-27 Thread paul swed
The xtal causes close to zero carrier for a period of time on each phase shift. Regards Paul WB8TSL On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:07 AM, J. Forster wrote: > The AM just makes the situation in low S/N areas worse. The BPSK wipes out > the possibility of any very narrow band prefiltering, because of

Re: [time-nuts] WWVB PM Receiver

2012-09-27 Thread paul swed
Why not DCF. NIH. Just joking. Good comments that are detailed. The phase does not change every second though it can. There are many times when the phase sits for 3 or more seconds. The PLL TC is about 2-3 seconds on the older receivers so they tend to jump around never really locking or only for a

Re: [time-nuts] WWVB Response

2012-09-27 Thread J. Forster
The AM just makes the situation in low S/N areas worse. The BPSK wipes out the possibility of any very narrow band prefiltering, because of filter time response. I suspect, although have not tested, that active antennas with either mechanical or crystal filters in their preamps will be rendered us

Re: [time-nuts] Lady Heather on a Laptop

2012-09-27 Thread Hui Zhang
I also use a vintage IBM laptop to running Lady Heather, It's 128MB ram and 350MHz CPU, works very well. Hui - At 2012-09-27 21:39:10,"Michael Baker" wrote: >Hi, All-- > >I have dedicated an ancient Windows 95 laptop to sitting >on a shelf in my workshop running Lady Heather

  1   2   >