[time-nuts] repairing General Technology (Tracor) 304-B rubidium standard

2013-02-18 Thread Stewart Cobb
Guys, I'm repairing a 1960's vintage lab-grade rubidium standard, General Technology Corporation model 304-B. Apparently Tracor bought GTC soon after this unit was made, because references to this as a "Tracor 304-B" seem to be more common. I've made some progress, but now it seems like time to

Re: [time-nuts] Future of UTC 2013

2013-02-18 Thread DaveH
Love the graphic on the website. The use of a Foucault Pendulum with Earth as the bob is inspired... > -Original Message- > From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com > [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Steve Allen > Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 20:18 > To: time-nuts@febo.com >

Re: [time-nuts] Allan deviation and modified Allan deviation

2013-02-18 Thread Magnus Danielson
Corby, On 18/02/13 20:59, cdel...@juno.com wrote: Ok I've been plotting my oscillators for years using Allan Deviation. That way all my records can be compared easily. Is there any advantage to using Modified Allan Deviation? It seems to give a better stability plot but that just seems to be

Re: [time-nuts] OCXO DC Current Question

2013-02-18 Thread Ed Palmer
Hi Bob, On 2/18/2013 6:19 PM, Bob Camp wrote: Hi The -Z3811 is indeed a part out of a HP GPSDO. HP is a big enough customer that the part they get *may* have little relation to the standard part. True, but it doesn't look like there were many Z3811s made. The order wouldn't have been that

[time-nuts] Future of UTC 2013

2013-02-18 Thread Steve Allen
In late 2011 we held a meeting on the Future of UTC in Exton Pennsylvania. The 400 pages of proceedings from the presentations at that meeting have been published on paper and in electronic form. The sequel to that meeting is planned for late May of this year. Requirements for UTC and Civi

Re: [time-nuts] FE-5680A DDS Board/PIC Code

2013-02-18 Thread EB4APL
Hi, Probably Elio will jump in and tell us more on this, but I must advice that the unit where he did his forensic examination was a FE-5680A of the 10 MHz fixed frequency output variety (not accounting for the small adjustment margin)and also has a fixed 1 PPS. This unit doesn't have the t

Re: [time-nuts] FE-5680A DDS Board/PIC Code

2013-02-18 Thread WB6BNQ
Hi Herbert, Nice work ! A few comments that may help you in your quest. There are two primary methodologies used in the FEI-5680A Rubidium. It appears, from your picture, what you have is the older style that is analog for control of the Rubidium frequency control loop. A VERY GOOD THING ! Wh

Re: [time-nuts] OCXO DC Current Question

2013-02-18 Thread Bob Camp
Hi The -Z3811 is indeed a part out of a HP GPSDO. HP is a big enough customer that the part they get *may* have little relation to the standard part. If they all started out at the same temperature, then the noisy ones finish warmup quicker than the quiet ones. Take a look at when the final "gl

Re: [time-nuts] Allan deviation and modified Allan deviation

2013-02-18 Thread Tom Van Baak (lab)
I often plot both ADEV and MDEV, too. The difference between them indicates the amount of white phase noise there is in the measurement (the sum of DUT and REF and phase meter). You'll see for some standards, especially at longer tau, there is little or no difference. Right, MDEV is almost alw

Re: [time-nuts] FE-5680A DDS Board/PIC Code

2013-02-18 Thread GandalfG8
In a message dated 18/02/2013 22:45:12 GMT Standard Time, paulsw...@gmail.com writes: Herbert Thanks for the assembly listing. Someone else on time-nuts had done quite the job of reverse engineering the schematics and other information. Seems like the two of you could collaborate. Sorry do no

Re: [time-nuts] OCXO DC Current Question

2013-02-18 Thread Ed Palmer
Hi Bob, On 2/18/2013 2:42 PM, Bob Camp wrote: Hi Like any control loop, gain, bandwidth and noise are all related. In a DOCXO you have two control loops and they do interact. That said, there's nothing grossly wrong with the four OCXO's. The noisy parts have a bit more gain in the controller

Re: [time-nuts] FE-5680A DDS Board/PIC Code

2013-02-18 Thread Bob Camp
Hi There's quite a bit less in the PIC code than I would have expected. If that's everything that's there, the PIC does very little heavy lifting. Nice job on the dis-assembly. Many of the 10 MHz out FE Rb's are actually the 1 pps version that has been converted to 10 MHz after the fact. The

Re: [time-nuts] FE-5680A DDS Board/PIC Code

2013-02-18 Thread paul swed
Herbert Thanks for the assembly listing. Someone else on time-nuts had done quite the job of reverse engineering the schematics and other information. Seems like the two of you could collaborate. Sorry do not recall the name. Welcome to time-nuts. Regards Paul WB8TSL On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 4:32 P

[time-nuts] FE-5680A DDS Board/PIC Code

2013-02-18 Thread Herbert Poetzl
I'm new to the time-nuts community, so I simply start with a short info on how I got into this situation :) (skip forward to if not interested) Not long ago, I decided to build a reasonably good frequency counter for my personal use and maybe if the result is simple and elegant, I'll publish th

Re: [time-nuts] OCXO DC Current Question

2013-02-18 Thread Bob Camp
Hi Like any control loop, gain, bandwidth and noise are all related. In a DOCXO you have two control loops and they do interact. That said, there's nothing grossly wrong with the four OCXO's. The noisy parts have a bit more gain in the controller. The quiet parts have a bit less gain. The easy

Re: [time-nuts] OCXO DC Current Question

2013-02-18 Thread Chuck Harris
It's not really noise, the feedback loop is marginally stable. What you are seeing is how the stability changes due to minor differences in the parts used in the loop, and the thermal masses and insulation of the oven. -Chuck Harris Ed Palmer wrote: I know that when making AC measurements on v

[time-nuts] Allan deviation and modified Allan deviation

2013-02-18 Thread cdelect
Ok I've been plotting my oscillators for years using Allan Deviation. That way all my records can be compared easily. Is there any advantage to using Modified Allan Deviation? It seems to give a better stability plot but that just seems to be cheating! If I plot both ways what do the difference

[time-nuts] OCXO DC Current Question

2013-02-18 Thread Ed Palmer
I know that when making AC measurements on various OCXOs of the same type, you have to expect wide variations in the results. e.g. TVB's Allan Deviation measurements on a selection of 10811A oscillators at http://www.leapsecond.com/pages/z3801a-osc . But what about DC current measurements?

Re: [time-nuts] FRK-L Rubidium

2013-02-18 Thread Garren Davis
Bob, Just wanted to let you know your advice to let the FRK run for a while was spot on. The lock voltage is down to 9.2 volts. I was able to get my thunderbolt with the bad oscillator oven working by heating the oscillator with a power resistor. After it locked I could see on an oscilloscope

Re: [time-nuts] Reverse-engineering LPRO

2013-02-18 Thread paul swed
That was the intent. Break/toss / we get to buy'em after a pile stacks up. >From what I have run into peaking may or may not be the right answer is my only real addition to the discussion. The RF oscillator on the bulb peak if even tunable. The hamonic multiplier. Peaking that could easily lead to

Re: [time-nuts] Reverse-engineering LPRO

2013-02-18 Thread Bob Camp
Hi I think the truth of the matter is that these gizmos have been cheap enough (and complicated enough) that they don't get repaired a lot. Certainly the VCXO gets tweaked, and there are a couple of caps that explode / get replaced. Past that either they don't break, or they get replaced. Bob