I should have mentioned this in the original post - the measurements were
not taken on the same cable length. Beware, and consult paper.
Ole
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 7:52 AM, Ole Petter Ronningen wrote:
> Hi, all
>
> The question of phase shifts in cables pops up every
Hi, all
The question of phase shifts in cables pops up every now and then on this
list - I stumbled across a good table of measured phase shifts with
temperature in different cable types in this paper:
http://www.ira.inaf.it/eratec/gothenburg/presentations/ERATEC_2014_PresentationWSchaefer.pdf
Hi
> On Jan 12, 2017, at 4:06 PM, Bob Stewart wrote:
>
> Hi Bob,
> OK, like Bugs Bunny, I'll venture out on the limb, cut the limb, and see
> whether I fall or the tree falls:
> Wouldn't it take 1801 samples to get 18 seconds at 100S tau? Maybe I didn't
> state that
Hi Tom,
I seem to remember a discussion of overlapping vs contiguous ADEV from some
time ago. So, I did a websearch, and this showed up from your site. NB this
is a link to a pdf file.
leapsecond.com/hsn2006/pendulum-tides-ch2.pdf
Bob
From: Tom Van Baak
To:
Bob,
The minimal C code for (back-to-back or overlapping) ADEV is:
stride = overlap ? 1 : tau;
for (sum = n = i = 0; (i + 2*tau) < count; i += stride, n += 1)
sum += pow(phase[i + 2*tau] - 2 * phase[i + tau] + phase[i], 2);
return sqrt(sum / 2 / n) / tau;
See adev_lib.c
The pesudo code for the Adev is quite easy to interpret.
For a frequency record of N samples
For each tau=M samples
Reshape(N/M,M)
Mean
Diff
Rms
End
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 4:11 PM Bob Stewart wrote:
> Hi Bob,
>
> OK, like Bugs Bunny, I'll venture out on the
Hi Bob,
OK, like Bugs Bunny, I'll venture out on the limb, cut the limb, and see
whether I fall or the tree falls:
Wouldn't it take 1801 samples to get 18 seconds at 100S tau? Maybe I didn't
state that properly, but I think you get my meaning. Also, I've never actually
taken the time to look
Hi
Keep in mind that when you do 1800 samples at 1 second, that data will only
meet the
100 sample requirement out to tau = 18 seconds. Past that you are in the “under
100 samples
region”.
Bob
> On Jan 12, 2017, at 2:32 PM, Bob Stewart wrote:
>
> Hi Bob,
> OK, thanks for
Hi Bob,
OK, thanks for explaining. When you and others use highly technical terms like
"small number of samples" it's not always clear to me what you mean. =) Ten
samples? That's not enough for anything. Normally I run at least 1800
samples; at least if I plan to share them with someone.
Gary -
The Datum 9520 series are Time Code Displays (discontinued).
They have been appearing via government and military surplus via obsolescence
sales.
In addition to the 6-digit time display of the 9520 series, this specific model
(-1000) includes the 3-digit Day of Year (DoY).
I believe
Hi
It varies from 5370 to 5370. You see a lot of plots that run out to 10 samples
or less. Anything below 100 samples
is risky in some senses.
Bob
> On Jan 12, 2017, at 12:25 PM, Bob Stewart wrote:
>
> Hi Bob,
> OK, what's a small number of data points? Attached is a
Hi,
I've got an HP/Symmetricom 58502A 10MHz frequency reference
distribution amplifier. It has two 10MHz signal inputs and it
auto-switches between inputs if one of them goes down.
The 58502A had been working fine for the couple of years that I've had it,
but recently it failed in a
I am looking for documentation for a Datum 9520-1000 time code display.
Thanks
Gary
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Hi
There is a big difference between RMS and single shot. Single shot, the 5370 is
a very different beast.
That’s not a big deal when you have a few thousand readings and it all averages
down. Unfortunately
we all love to do runs with a very small number of points and then draw
conclusions
Hi Bob,
Normally I see somewhere between 2E-11 and 4E-11 at 1S tau on my 5370A, as in
the blue trace on the attached plot. Am I misunderstanding your meaning?
Granted, I am clocking the 5370A with a GPSDO, but I believe I see about the
same thing with the HP10811. This test was 1PPS vs 1PPS
Hi
There are a number of ways to improve the resolution (and accuracy) of your
data without spending
big piles of cash. They have been discussed here on the list many times over
the last few years.
What I’m suggesting is that you dig into that ahead of taking data. You will
dive into it
On 12 January 2017 at 02:31, Bob Camp wrote:
> Hi
>
Hi Bob
>
> The most basic issue you are going to run into is that your counter is not
> high enough
> resolution / accuracy to give you meaningful data for time intervals under
> a few hundred
> seconds.
Is that true if I'm
17 matches
Mail list logo