Re: [time-nuts] backfill

2017-06-10 Thread Bob kb8tq
Hi You do work pretty hard to turn the metal can into a getter. The other issue is that the adsorption and desorption rates are quite different. Once you get the “stuff” into a layer state, it takes a long time to get it back out. Much better to not have it there in the first place. If the

Re: [time-nuts] backfill

2017-06-09 Thread Neville Michie
It is possible that the ageing of a crystal is associated with the redistribution of the surface water monolayer, under the influence of the minute temperature gradient of an oscillating crystal. Some energy is dissipated in the quartz, so some gradient may exist. When a crystal is resting, the w

Re: [time-nuts] backfill

2017-06-09 Thread Bob kb8tq
Hi Well one thing that happens is that the glue that holds the blank in the holder turns to ash …. Bob > On Jun 9, 2017, at 8:31 PM, Hal Murray wrote: > > >> You can’t quite process a crystal at 300C, but you can get close. > > What happens if you get it too hot or too long? What's the lim

Re: [time-nuts] backfill

2017-06-09 Thread Bruce Griffiths
alpha quartz to beta quartz phase transition at 573C amongst other factors. Bruce > > On 10 June 2017 at 12:31 Hal Murray wrote: > > > > > > You can’t quite process a crystal at 300C, but you can get close. > > > > > > What happens if you get it too hot or too

Re: [time-nuts] backfill

2017-06-09 Thread Hal Murray
> You can’t quite process a crystal at 300C, but you can get close. What happens if you get it too hot or too long? What's the limiting factor? -- These are my opinions. I hate spam. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscr

Re: [time-nuts] backfill

2017-06-09 Thread Bob kb8tq
Hi You can’t quite process a crystal at 300C, but you can get close. Bob > On Jun 9, 2017, at 7:38 PM, Neville Michie wrote: > > My memory of high vacuum work is that you need to pump for 4 hours > at 300C to remove the water monolayer from glass. > On top of the that water monolayer is anoth

Re: [time-nuts] backfill

2017-06-09 Thread Neville Michie
My memory of high vacuum work is that you need to pump for 4 hours at 300C to remove the water monolayer from glass. On top of the that water monolayer is another water monolayer that comes off more easily, and on top of that another……….. cheers, Neville Michie > On 9 Jun 2017, at 10:57 AM, Ri

Re: [time-nuts] backfill

2017-06-09 Thread Charles Steinmetz
Poul-Henning wrote: Next down the line is hydrogen, which comes with a shitload of issues. No argument there. But other methods all have their own shitloads -- it just depends on which shitload the designers dislike the least. you will find little love for hydrogen cooling [today] In 199

Re: [time-nuts] backfill

2017-06-09 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <593a4677.5080...@yandex.com>, Charles Steinmetz writes: >The insides of mains alternators are almost entirely metal -- tons and >tons of copper tubing, and the casings and rotor shaft are steel. And >the alternators must operate at a relative humidity of absolute zero. Th

Re: [time-nuts] backfill

2017-06-09 Thread Bob kb8tq
Hi Cold traps and vac-ion pumps were very common on precision crystal seal setups 50 years ago. They have gotten better since then…. Bob > On Jun 9, 2017, at 9:13 AM, jimlux wrote: > > On 6/8/17 1:19 PM, Bob kb8tq wrote: >> Hi >> >> If you look at the thermal conductivity vs very low pressu

Re: [time-nuts] backfill

2017-06-09 Thread Bob kb8tq
Hi My guess is that crystals are more sensitive to moisture than the alternators…. The level of “clean” you need in a precision crystal enclosure is way beyond what is required in a number of other areas. One layer of water molecules is way to much in a modern crystal. can and do use crystals

Re: [time-nuts] backfill

2017-06-09 Thread jimlux
On 6/8/17 1:19 PM, Bob kb8tq wrote: Hi If you look at the thermal conductivity vs very low pressures, the conductivity comes up pretty quickly from a hard vacuum. There is essentially no impact on Q. basically, when the mean free path gets to be shorter than the distance to the wall, the the

Re: [time-nuts] backfill (was: Poor man's oven)

2017-06-09 Thread Didier Juges
ctive remover of heat :-)) > Alan > G3NYK > > - Original Message - From: "Bob kb8tq" > To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" < > time-nuts@febo.com> > Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2017 9:19 PM > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] backfil

Re: [time-nuts] backfill (was: Poor man's oven)

2017-06-09 Thread Van Horn, David
Wouldn't the low density of helium reduce some mechanical friction? I realize the motions are small but they are motions. The "Cousteau effect"? :) ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mail

Re: [time-nuts] backfill

2017-06-09 Thread Charles Steinmetz
Bob wrote: In this case hydrogen + oxygen (like from oxidized metal) goes to H20. You very much do not want water running around inside your crystal holder… Helium is inert. The insides of mains alternators are almost entirely metal -- tons and tons of copper tubing, and the casings and roto

Re: [time-nuts] backfill

2017-06-08 Thread Charles Steinmetz
Bob wrote: You really want to use Helium. Hydrogen is a bit reactive. I don't think it's a problem. The alternators on mains powerplants are filled with Hydrogen under fair pressure, and the internal materials and conditions are not that different from a crystal oscillator inside an oven.

Re: [time-nuts] backfill

2017-06-08 Thread Richard (Rick) Karlquist
On 6/8/2017 5:08 PM, Bob kb8tq wrote: Hi In this case hydrogen + oxygen (like from oxidized metal) goes to H20. You very much do not want water running around inside your crystal holder… Helium is inert. Bob Exactly right Bob. The 10811 guys used to go nuts about keeping water out of the

Re: [time-nuts] backfill

2017-06-08 Thread Bob kb8tq
Hi In this case hydrogen + oxygen (like from oxidized metal) goes to H20. You very much do not want water running around inside your crystal holder… Helium is inert. Bob > On Jun 8, 2017, at 7:18 PM, Charles Steinmetz wrote: > > Bob wrote: > >> You really want to use Helium. Hydrogen is a

Re: [time-nuts] backfill

2017-06-08 Thread Richard (Rick) Karlquist
Bob is exactly right. Read up on "mean free path" physics. Just a little air will take care of conduction. Full atmospheric pressure would drop the Q something like a factor of 2. In any event, conduction through the crystal mounts is plenty adequate for the tiny thermal mass of the crystal itse

Re: [time-nuts] backfill (was: Poor man's oven)

2017-06-08 Thread Bob kb8tq
; - Original Message - From: "Bob kb8tq" > To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" > > Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2017 9:19 PM > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] backfill (was: Poor man's oven) > > >> Hi >> >> If you loo

Re: [time-nuts] backfill (was: Poor man's oven)

2017-06-08 Thread Alan Melia
9:19 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] backfill (was: Poor man's oven) Hi If you look at the thermal conductivity vs very low pressures, the conductivity comes up pretty quickly from a hard vacuum. There is essentially no impact on Q. Bob On Jun 8, 2017, at 4:03 PM, Attila Kinali wrote: On

Re: [time-nuts] backfill (was: Poor man's oven)

2017-06-08 Thread Bob kb8tq
Hi If you look at the thermal conductivity vs very low pressures, the conductivity comes up pretty quickly from a hard vacuum. There is essentially no impact on Q. Bob > On Jun 8, 2017, at 4:03 PM, Attila Kinali wrote: > > On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 06:55:07 -0400 > Bob kb8tq wrote: > >> The simpl

[time-nuts] backfill (was: Poor man's oven)

2017-06-08 Thread Attila Kinali
On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 06:55:07 -0400 Bob kb8tq wrote: > The simple answer is that the backfill is done because it does matter in a > lot of > cases. This raises the question, why there is backfill (just for thermal conductivity?) and how much it affects the Q of the crystal.