Re: [time-nuts] phase noise and related stuff

2007-04-01 Thread Enrico Rubiola
On 31 Mar 2007, at 20:45 , John Miles wrote: So your low-noise DC amplifier paper from '04 is awaiting my attention PCB layout may be available (incl. gerber), if the technician has not lost the files! Cheers, Enrico Enrico Rubiola professor of electronics web:http://rubiola.org e-mail:

[time-nuts] phase noise and related stuff

2007-03-31 Thread Enrico Rubiola
Dear colleagues, I am new in this community, so I wish to introduce myself. Born in 1957, built the first receiver at the age of 11 and realized immediately afterwards that that radio engineering is much easier than social relationships. Yet never got a call sign (shame on myself). Now I am a

Re: [time-nuts] phase noise and related stuff

2007-03-31 Thread John Miles
Hi, Enrico -- I think a lot of us already tracked down your (excellent) site based on a couple of links to your papers that were mentioned on the list earlier. Thanks for making that content available! These days, it seems that half of Google's search results on any given topic point to sites at

Re: [time-nuts] phase noise and related stuff

2007-03-31 Thread John Ackermann N8UR
John Miles said the following on 03/31/2007 02:45 PM: (I was going to ask if you had any thoughts on Charles Wenzel's similar article on noise-measurement preamp design, but I see the link on his page at http://www.wenzel.com/documents/measuringphasenoise.htm is now broken...) John, I'm not

Re: [time-nuts] phase noise and related stuff

2007-03-31 Thread John Miles
Yep, that's the one. It used to be linked from his measuringphasenoise.htm page but the link now points to something on his own f: drive, which is sadly inaccessible to the rest of us... -- john, KE5FX John, I'm not sure if this is the article you had in mind, but there's a design for a low

Re: [time-nuts] phase noise and related stuff

2007-03-31 Thread Rex
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 11:45:08 -0700, John Miles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (I was going to ask if you had any thoughts on Charles Wenzel's similar article on noise-measurement preamp design, but I see the link on his page at http://www.wenzel.com/documents/measuringphasenoise.htm is now broken...)

Re: [time-nuts] phase noise and related stuff

2007-03-31 Thread John Ackermann N8UR
John Miles said the following on 03/31/2007 03:16 PM: Yep, that's the one. It used to be linked from his measuringphasenoise.htm page but the link now points to something on his own f: drive, which is sadly inaccessible to the rest of us... Yes, a bunch of the Wenzel links point to F:, but

Re: [time-nuts] phase noise and related stuff

2007-03-31 Thread Dr Bruce Griffiths
John Miles wrote: Hi, Enrico -- I think a lot of us already tracked down your (excellent) site based on a couple of links to your papers that were mentioned on the list earlier. Thanks for making that content available! These days, it seems that half of Google's search results on any given

Re: [time-nuts] phase noise and related stuff

2007-03-31 Thread Dr Bruce Griffiths
John Ackermann N8UR wrote: John Miles said the following on 03/31/2007 03:16 PM: Yep, that's the one. It used to be linked from his measuringphasenoise.htm page but the link now points to something on his own f: drive, which is sadly inaccessible to the rest of us... Yes, a bunch

Re: [time-nuts] phase noise and related stuff

2007-03-31 Thread John Ackermann N8UR
Dr Bruce Griffiths said the following on 03/31/2007 08:36 PM: Some MSWindows html editors (e.g. Open Office) are notorious for automatically substituting the fully qualified link path for a relative link path, that has been typed in so that the page should have been reasonably portable. If

Re: [time-nuts] phase noise and related stuff

2007-03-31 Thread Magnus Danielson
From: John Ackermann N8UR [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [time-nuts] phase noise and related stuff Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 20:49:09 -0400 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dr Bruce Griffiths said the following on 03/31/2007 08:36 PM: Some MSWindows html editors (e.g. Open Office) are notorious

Re: [time-nuts] phase noise and related stuff

2007-03-31 Thread Didier Juges
I like Joe's editor myself (Wordstar background). A colleague and I are having ongoing arguments about vi versus Joe's. I say it takes many more keystrokes to do the same job under vi, she says it does not take her any longer than me to do anything because I am a lousy typist, I tell her if