Re: [Tinycc-devel] Opinions on constexpr being added to C2X?

ginal Message- From: Tinycc-devel [mailto:tinycc-devel-bounces+eligis <mailto:tinycc-devel-bounces%2Beligis> =orange...@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of Elijah Stone Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2021 01:09 To: tinycc-devel@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] Opinions on constexpr being added to C2X?

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Opinions on constexpr being added to C2X?

➢ I think any added C11 features should be welcome, C2X features are secondary, imo unless it is low-hanging fruit and easy to implement. I fully agree!! ___ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/t

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Opinions on constexpr being added to C2X?

cacoshf cacosh cacoshl > > atanhatanhf atanhatanhl catanhf catanh catanhl > > > > -Original Message- > From: Tinycc-devel [mailto:tinycc-devel-bounces+eligis= > orange...@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of Elijah Stone > Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2021 01

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Opinions on constexpr being added to C2X?

17, 2021 01:09 To: tinycc-devel@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] Opinions on constexpr being added to C2X? Atomics are here now; I think the only thing missing is wide-chars/strings, no? I have a patch to support a number of c11/c2x features (including widestrings), but the last time I

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Opinions on constexpr being added to C2X?

constexpr being added to C2X?   There's a new proposal to add it, and the standard is especially interested in hearing from small compiler devs their opinions on such a feature. http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2851.pdf ___ T

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Opinions on constexpr being added to C2X?

To be honest, this seems like a _very_ limited use-case, and probably not one that is worth to support. Sorry. I think that either: 1. Compile-time computation needs to have very few restrictions; in this case it is very useful, but impractical to implement; or 2. Compile-time computation

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Opinions on constexpr being added to C2X?

e this one. M2c From: Tinycc-devel [mailto:tinycc-devel-bounces+eligis=orange...@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of Marcus Johnson Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2021 10:36 To: tinycc-devel@nongnu.org Subject: [Tinycc-devel] Opinions on constexpr being added to C2X? There's a new proposal to

[Tinycc-devel] Opinions on constexpr being added to C2X?

There's a new proposal to add it, and the standard is especially interested in hearing from small compiler devs their opinions on such a feature. http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2851.pdf _