Atomics are here now; I think the only thing missing is
wide-chars/strings, no?
I have a patch to support a number of c11/c2x features (including
widestrings), but the last time I posted it on this list I was met with
crickets, so I am not sure what else to do with it (aside from continuing
to use it for myself).
-E
On Thu, 14 Oct 2021, Christian Jullien wrote:
I’m big fan of constexpr in C++ that allows compile time computations and more
code elimination. I probably overuse constexpr in my code.
I’m not sure that the nature of tcc will find a big impact with constexpr
support.
There are many missing C11 features that should be handled before this one.
M2c
From: Tinycc-devel [mailto:tinycc-devel-bounces+eligis=orange...@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of Marcus Johnson
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2021 10:36
To: tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [Tinycc-devel] Opinions on constexpr being added to C2X?
There's a new proposal to add it, and the standard is especially interested in
hearing from small compiler devs their opinions on such a feature.
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2851.pdf
_______________________________________________
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
