Sudipto Mallick:
> I am new here, I do not know whose approval I need
> to push the changes. Whom to ask for approval?
Not being a contributor to TCC, I can't tell you.
Since nobody has answered, chances are no one among
the readers of this mailing list is interested in
tranditional
On 12/26/20, Anton Shepelev wrote:
> I agree that *roff syntax is simultaneosly concise,
> writable, and readable, whereas texinfo is a huge
> package with a verbose syntax and dependencies on
> LaTeX and other third-party formatters. That said,
> *roff would be the natural choice for
Sudipto Mallick to Michael Matz:
> As I am reformatting it, I do not find it hard to
> write. It must have been writable enough to be
> used in writing almost all manual pages in OpenBSD
> etc. Also current setup depends on perl to be in-
> stalled, which is not a hard requirement, but
Hello,
On Fri, 25 Dec 2020, Sudipto Mallick wrote:
When I compiled a recent version of tinycc from mob, I looked at the
source of the manpage. I don't like it.
In which sense? tcc.1 is a generated file, it's not supposed to be
edited. The source is tcc-doc.texi, i.e. texinfo, via texi2pod
Sudipto Mallick:
> When I compiled a recent version of tinycc from mob, I
> looked at the source of the manpage. I don't like it.
What did not you like?
> I learnt about the mdoc(7) format for writing man pages
> and thought to use that format for the tcc man page. The
> rewrite is attached.
When I compiled a recent version of tinycc from mob, I looked at the
source of the manpage. I don't like it. I learnt about the mdoc(7)
format for writing man pages and thought to use that format for the
tcc man page. The rewrite is attached.
What do you think about this mdoc formatted manual
