On 12/26/20, Anton Shepelev <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree that *roff syntax is simultaneosly concise, > writable, and readable, whereas texinfo is a huge > package with a verbose syntax and dependencies on > LaTeX and other third-party formatters. That said, > *roff would be the natural choice for TCC because of > its similar minimalist ideology, but since the offi- > cial documentaion tool for TCC is Texinfo, I fear > your good effort will not appreciated...
Hmm. I am just asking for the change only of the manpage, not the whole documentation. The documentation and manpage can be kept in sync without much problem, I think. I am new here, I do not know whose approval I need to push the changes. Whom to ask for approval? >> There's also texi2mdoc which is written in C, but >> I haven't tried that. > That means using the makrup language from a large > system, but converting into the language of a sim- > pler system by means of a C program. Everybody will > not like it... I think that using Texinfo directly > is better. Well... Same with the current texi2pod.pl. except for being written in C means texi2mdoc do not need an external dependency :-) --Sudipto _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
