Sudipto Mallick to Michael Matz: > As I am reformatting it, I do not find it hard to > write. It must have been writable enough to be > used in writing almost all manual pages in OpenBSD > etc. Also current setup depends on perl to be in- > stalled, which is not a hard requirement, but > still ...
I agree that *roff syntax is simultaneosly concise, writable, and readable, whereas texinfo is a huge package with a verbose syntax and dependencies on LaTeX and other third-party formatters. That said, *roff would be the natural choice for TCC because of its similar minimalist ideology, but since the offi- cial documentaion tool for TCC is Texinfo, I fear your good effort will not appreciated... > There's also texi2mdoc which is written in C, but > I haven't tried that. That means using the makrup language from a large system, but converting into the language of a sim- pler system by means of a C program. Everybody will not like it... I think that using Texinfo directly is better. _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel