RE: class demos/group activities/list behavior

2000-03-04 Thread Stephen M. Smith
>= Original Message From "Gary Peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> = >I agreed with a number of points Cheryl Schwartz made in a recent post >about Davis, but one area that I thought useful for TIPS discussion concerns >when and how and what kind of class demos or "illustrative" group activi

class demos/group activities/list behavior

2000-03-04 Thread Gary Peterson
I agreed with a number of points Cheryl Schwartz made in a recent post about Davis, but one area that I thought useful for TIPS discussion concerns when and how and what kind of class demos or "illustrative" group activities might be used. That is, what kinds of "fun and games" activities are

Re: Mr. Davis' list behavior

2000-03-02 Thread Molly Straight
m: Annette Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2000 3:07 PM Subject: Re: Mr. Davis' list behavior > > Ok, so given the information below, what was he doing on a list > dedicated to teaching in _PSYCHOLOGY_?? > > >

Re: Mr. Davis' list behavior (fwd)

2000-03-02 Thread David Wasieleski, Ph.D.
For those of you who wondered whether Bill's decision was a good one, I submit exhibit A: >From: Donald Carter Davis<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: Mr. Davis' list behavior (fwd) >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Wasieleski, Ph.D.) >Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 14

Re: Mr. Davis' list behavior

2000-03-02 Thread Annette Taylor
Ok, so given the information below, what was he doing on a list dedicated to teaching in _PSYCHOLOGY_?? On Thu, 2 Mar 2000, David wrote: > Yes, I know, we've paid too much attention to him, but..since there > had been some curiosity expressed... > > Author > Davis, Donald Carter. > Title >

Re: Mr. Davis' list behavior

2000-03-02 Thread Sue Frantz
I agree with David on this: > Yes, I know, we've paid too much attention to him, but..since there > had been some curiosity expressed... But, like David, I couldn't resist. Here's Donald Carter Davis' webpage for the curious: http://www.mcs.com/~yyz/home.html -- Sue Frantz

Re: Mr. Davis' list behavior

2000-03-02 Thread Joel S. Freund
Although you have provided some information about Dr. Davis, I might also point out that at least according to my information, Dr. Davis is an account executive at MRI and is not affiliated with an academic institution. (It is possible that my source has not been updated recently.) Joel

Re: Mr. Davis' list behavior

2000-03-02 Thread David
Yes, I know, we've paid too much attention to him, but..since there had been some curiosity expressed... Author Davis, Donald Carter. Title FUNDAMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS OF THE PHYSICAL AGING AND GLASS TRANSITION OF AMORPHOUS POLYMERS. Institution Thesis (PH.D.)--NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY. 19

Re: Mr. Davis' list behavior (fwd)

2000-03-02 Thread David Wasieleski, Ph.D.
>You see, Louis Schmier-style education works fine at a history class at >Valdosta State (the equivalent of an adult day care center, I guessing), >but when actual education is the desired result, actual teaching must >happen. > >To me it's no accident that some of you empty cans that are rattlin

Re: Mr. Davis' list behavior (fwd)

2000-03-02 Thread G. Marc Turner
At 12:08 AM 3/2/2000 -0600, I wrote: {a few questions about Mr. Davis} Then I forgot to include the proper sig file... my mistake. Here's my chance to fix that... - Marc G. Marc Turner, MEd Lecturer & Head of Computer Operations Department of Psychology Southwest Texas State University San Mar

Re: Mr. Davis' list behavior (fwd)

2000-03-01 Thread G. Marc Turner
Okay, Donald has made a claim that Louis' teaching style is inadequate to achieve "Actual education". Of course, by his own admission Donald's teaching style has led primarily to incidents of cheating by his students. I'm curious if he therefore views the cheating behavior as more characteristic o

Re: Mr. Davis' list behavior (fwd)

2000-03-01 Thread Donald Carter Davis
rom: ANN MUIR THOMAS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: ANN MUIR THOMAS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Mr. Davis' list behavior In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Bill Southerly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thank you

Re: Mr. Davis' list behavior

2000-03-01 Thread ANN MUIR THOMAS
Thank you. he sent me a pretty awful troll in response to my last message. On Wed, 1 Mar 2000, Bill Southerly wrote: > Date sent: 1-MAR-2000 17:11:46 > > TIPSters, > > Mr. Davis is no longer with us on the list. > > Best wishes, > > Bill > > > ***

Mr. Davis' list behavior

2000-03-01 Thread Bill Southerly
Date sent: 1-MAR-2000 17:11:46 TIPSters, Mr. Davis is no longer with us on the list. Best wishes, Bill ** ** * TIPS LISTOWNER - CONTACT DIRECTLY IF

RE: List behavior

1999-06-29 Thread Michael Sylvester
On Tue, 29 Jun 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > When I teach both intro and social one of my main goals is to make students > aware of the cognitive biases that affect the way all of us view the world > and interpret events, behavior, etc. I usually cite a study by Vallone, > Ross, & Lepper (19

Re: List behavior

1999-06-29 Thread Matthew P. Winslow
riginal Message----- > From: Linda M. Woolf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, June 28, 1999 9:51 PM > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: List behavior > > Hi Rick and Tipsters, > > Rick Adams wrote: > > > Linda, why is it whenever I respond to

RE: List behavior

1999-06-29 Thread QuantyM
iginal Message- From: Linda M. Woolf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 28, 1999 9:51 PM Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: List behavior Hi Rick and Tipsters, Rick Adams wrote: > Linda, why is it whenever I respond to anyone who posts something about > Michael Syl

Re: List behavior

1999-06-28 Thread Anonymous
Hi Rick and Tipsters, Rick Adams wrote: > Linda, why is it whenever I respond to anyone who posts something about > Michael Sylvester you insist on taking it as a personal attack on you? Perhaps, you phrased it poorly but it was how you characterized all who objected to Michael's posts.

RE: List behavior

1999-06-28 Thread Anonymous
Linda wrote: > So my posts have been adolescent? Linda, why is it whenever I respond to anyone who posts something about Michael Sylvester you insist on taking it as a personal attack on you? My comment was directed to a specific poster who stated that permitting convers

List behavior

1999-06-28 Thread Anonymous
Howdy Rick, Rick Adams wrote: > > If those who believe that free speech means we must listen to > > endless adolescent discussion, then what is left? > > Isn't that what we are listening to from the Michael Sylvester opponents? So my posts have been adolescent? > What you are _