Rick Adams writes on 24 Jun 99,:
> Rick Froman wrote:
>
> > On 24 Jun 99, at 12:05, Michael Sylvester wrote:
> >
> > > Consider the source (with or without documentation)
> >
> > Is there a difference between this and ad hominem argumentation?
>
> I would certainly think so.
>
> If, for exam
Mike wrote:
> The statement in this example is not about an observable event
> (it includes the private-event qualifier, "knowingly"). If a
> scoundrel presents good data or a logical argument, the fact
> that it came from a scoundrel should not make a difference.
True.
The statement in this example is not about an observable event (it includes the
private-event qualifier, "knowingly"). If a scoundrel presents good data or a
logical argument, the fact that it came from a scoundrel should not make a
difference.
Rick Adams wrote:
>If, for exampl
Rick Froman wrote:
> On 24 Jun 99, at 12:05, Michael Sylvester wrote:
>
> > Consider the source (with or without documentation)
>
> Is there a difference between this and ad hominem argumentation?
I would certainly think so.
If, for example, I read the statement "I have
On 24 Jun 99, at 12:05, Michael Sylvester wrote:
> Consider the source (with or without documentation)
Is there a difference between this and ad hominem argumentation?
Rick
Dr. Rick Froman
Associate Professor of Psychology
John Brown University
Siloam Springs, AR 72761
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 24 Jun 99, at 12:05, Michael Sylvester wrote:
> Consider the source (with or without documentation)
Is there a difference between this and an ad hominem argument?
Rick
Dr. Rick Froman
Associate Professor of Psychology
John Brown University
Siloam Springs, AR 72761
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
