swego.edu/~klatsky
Oswego, NY 13126Voice: (315) 341 3474
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Jim Clark
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 1999 11:13 AM
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: a little question
Hi
On Wed, 1
Mike wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Scoles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 1999 3:05 PM
> To: Rick Adams
> Cc: Jim Guinee; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: a little question
>
>
> Jim wrote, "Why do I get two
Jim wrote, "Why do I get two replies?"
Others wrote, "The 'Reply to All' is so confusing, or people are just to
lazy to edit their 'to' fields."
Rick wrote, "Oh, Bill doesn't care about us anymore. : ("
I've just got to write, "If you get two of something, delete one. It's
easy! Worried abo
The answer as you will see twice is that when one replies on Outlook you
have a "reply" icon that will bring only the sender's name or a "reply to
all" icon that sends the response to you as the sender and the list as a
recipient of your original message. To get the message to the list only,
you
(You'll get this one twice, to illustrate the point)
Jim wrote:
> On occasion, I have posted a question or statement.
> Invariably, someone
> has responded to that question/statement, and send their reply
> to the list
> AND to me. My initial response has always been, "Now I got
At 9:49 AM -0600 8/18/99, Jim Guinee wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On occasion, I have posted a question or statement. Invariably, someone
>has responded to that question/statement, and send their reply to the list
>AND to me. My initial response has always been, "Now I got it twice. Why
>not just send it to
Jim Guinee wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On occasion, I have posted a question or statement. Invariably, someone
>has responded to that question/statement, and send their reply to the list
>AND to me. My initial response has always been, "Now I got it twice. Why
>not just send it to the list?"
>
>I'm really
Hi
On Wed, 18 Aug 1999, Jim Guinee wrote:
> On occasion, I have posted a question or statement. Invariably, someone
> has responded to that question/statement, and send their reply to the list
> AND to me. My initial response has always been, "Now I got it twice. Why
> not just send it to
