For anyone who would like to get the highlights of the recently published
article in audio format:
http://www.thepsychfiles.com/2014/07/ep-223-little-alberts-real-identity-time-to-rewrite-the-textbooks/
Michael
Michael A. Britt, Ph.D.
mich...@thepsychfiles.com
http://www.ThePsychFiles.com
Twitt
...for publishing a study that found no significant effects. This one was on
the old topic of learning styles. Yet another confirmation that there's
nothing to it. Something new: apparently "learning styles" is also referred to
as the "meshing hypothesis".
"Taken together, the results of our
And by "phonebook" I mean the latest college rankings but these
as all new and put out by "Money" magazine in contrast to U.S.
News and World Report. Money uses a different set of criteria
than USNWR and the two rankings don't really agree (though
no correlation coefficient is given). If you real
The magazine publishers revise their criteria and ranking systems each year
mainly to shake up the order a bit.
Does any one imagine these changes are motivated because the editors
discovered some new and useful metric that had been previously overlooked
or weighted incorrectly?
Why buy the latest
Memo to Time.com:
You want people to look at your site. Your site is so bloated by
advertisements that it can't be navigated.
BTW, schools committed to business programs and engineering
programs dominate your top schools. It would seem that 5 year
salary is your favorite metric.
On 7/
I see that 5% of the "quality of education" is based on RateMyProfessor scores.
From: Ken Steele
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2014 6:14 PM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: Re: [tips] Holy Crap! The New Phonebook Is Here And Somebody
Note, this list is "best for the money," not "best."
Chris
-
Christopher D. Green
Department of Psychology
York University
Toronto, ON M6C 1G4
Canada
chri...@yorku.ca
> On Jul 30, 2014, at 5:44 PM, Claudia Stanny wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The magazine publishers revise their criteria
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 15:20:46 -0700, Ken Steele wrote:
Memo to Time.com:
You want people to look at your site. Your site is so bloated
by advertisements that it can't be navigated.
I must be lucky. I did not have a deluge of adverts.
BTW, schools committed to business programs and engineeri
On 7/30/2014 7:30 PM, William Scott wrote:
I see that 5% of the "quality of education" is based on RateMyProfessor scores.
That is very funny. RateMyProfessor doesn't distinguish among a
1st time graduate student, a person who has been teaching the
course for 20 years, and an adjunct who ha
On 7/30/2014 8:01 PM, Mike Palij wrote:
BTW, schools committed to business programs and engineering
programs dominate your top schools. It would seem that 5 year
salary is your favorite metric.
|"The list has nothing to do with gratification, survey data or
|what people think," said Mr. Sc
10 matches
Mail list logo
