Floyd Allport was Gordon's older brother. Gordon was a student of Herbert
Langfeld.
Schlosberg was a student of Holt in his later, Princeton incarnation.
Chris
-
Christopher D. Green
Department of Psychology
York University
Toronto, ON M6C 1G4
Canada
chri...@yorku.ca
> On Feb 9, 2016, at
On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 11:00:51 -0800,Christopher Green wrote:
Gibson called actually himself a behaviorist, though obviously not in
the
Skinnerian mold. He was a student of E. B. Holt -- who was a disciple
of
William James (though Münsterberg was his dissertation advisor). Holt
was also
a co-foun
Gibson and Skinner both emphasize the primacy of the environment, although
Gibson does so with less of a "black box" approach.
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Mike Palij wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 08:47:27 -0800, Michael Scoles wrote:
>
>> My first guess wasn't that good. On pages 246-249 o
Gibson called actually himself a behaviorist, though obviously not in the
Skinnerian mold. He was a student of E. B. Holt -- who was a disciple of
William James (though Münsterberg was his dissertation advisor). Holt was also
a co-founder (w/ another James-disciple, R. B. Perry, among others) of
On 2/9/2016 12:57 PM, Mike Palij wrote:
On a sidenote, ordinarily when I think of Gibson I do not think
of Skinner but William Uttal in his book "Psychomythics" lumps
them together as radical empiricists. The text is available on
books.google.com in preview mode and the following link
should/mi
Floreat Labore"
[cid:image003.jpg@01D1633A.B6CDD210]
[cid:image004.jpg@01D1633A.B6CDD210]
___
From: Michael Scoles [mailto:micha...@uca.edu]
Sent: February 9, 2016 12:12 PM
To: Teaching in t
On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 08:47:27 -0800, Michael Scoles wrote:
My first guess wasn't that good. On pages 246-249 of "The senses
considered as perceptual systems," Gibson discusses reversible figure
ground and impossible (Escher-type) figures. His explanation is that
the
same stimulus can provide
ark
>
>
>
> *From:* Michael Scoles [mailto:micha...@uca.edu]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 09, 2016 10:46 AM
> *To:* Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
> *Subject:* Re: [tips] bottom up processing in humans
>
>
>
>
>
> My first guess wasn't that
_
-Original Message-
From: Annette Taylor [mailto:tay...@sandiego.edu<mailto:tay...@sandiego.edu>]
Sent: February-08-16 3:49 PM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: [tips] bottom up processing in humans
rt J. McKelvie, Ph.D., Phone: 819 822 9600 x 2402
>>>> Department of Psychology, Fax: 819 822 9661
>>>> Bishop's University,
>>>> 2600 rue College,
>>>> Sherbrooke,
>>>> Québec J1M 1Z7,
>>>> Canada.
>>
Nice answer!
Carol
Phone mail
> On Feb 8, 2016, at 10:15 PM, Mike Palij wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 12:57:00 -0800, Stuart McKelvie wrote:
>> Dear Tipsters,
>>
>> I like D. O. Hebb's distinction between sensation and
>> perception as a way of distinguishing bottom-up and
>> top-down proces
On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 12:57:00 -0800, Stuart McKelvie wrote:
Dear Tipsters,
I like D. O. Hebb's distinction between sensation and
perception as a way of distinguishing bottom-up and
top-down processing.
One thing to keep in mind is that the "bottom-up" versus
"top-down" distinction originates in
. McKelvie, Ph.D., Phone: 819 822 9600 x 2402
>>> Department of Psychology, Fax: 819 822 9661
>>> Bishop's University,
>>> 2600 rue College,
>>> Sherbrooke,
>>> Québec J1M 1Z7,
>>> Canada.
>>>
>>> E-mail: stuart.mckel...@ubishops.ca (or smcke...@ubish
ersity Psychology Department Web Page:
>> http://www.ubishops.ca/ccc/div/soc/psy
>>
>> Floreat Labore"
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>>
Hi
Because scientists consider all possible explanations/mechanisms to determine
which one is correct.
Also templates might be involved, for example in exemplar models, or even in
early learning before prototypes are developed.
Jim
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 8, 2016, at 3:35 PM, "Annette
http://www.ubishops.ca/ccc/div/soc/psy
Floreat Labore"
___
-Original Message-
From: Annette Taylor [mailto:tay...@sandiego.edu<mailto:tay...@sandiego.edu>]
Sent: February-08-16 3:49 PM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: [
> Bishop's University Psychology Department Web Page:
> http://www.ubishops.ca/ccc/div/soc/psy
>
> Floreat Labore"
>
>
>
>
> ___
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Annette Taylo
Hi Annette,
I would argue that both bottom-up and top-down work together and are both
ways of describing things from different perspectives. We assemble the
sensations into a whole--for example, in vision we assemble the size,
shape, movement (or lack thereof), color, and other components into a
co
Floreat Labore"
___
-Original Message-
From: Annette Taylor [mailto:tay...@sandiego.edu]
Sent: February-08-16 3:49 PM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
I am having a bit of a hard time this year answering questions about bottom up
processing.
Student question: How can it be truly bottom up if it requires a comparison to
a stored image? Isn't that like top-down? You use the stored image to recognize
what it is that is coming in. How are these a
20 matches
Mail list logo
