Mike Palij writes:
In my original post to TiPS, I wrote: |two papers that were
submitted to the journal Science that |the U.S. government
wants censored, that is, details removed |which would prevent
others from duplicating the work; Now, anyone involved in
experimental or other types of research
According to the Independent, a group of special scientific advisors
to the US Government decided that the details of the two studies into
H5N1 bird flu were too sensitive to be published in full and
recommended redactions to the manuscripts rather than a complete ban on
publication.
The US
In my original post to TiPS, I wrote:
|two papers that were submitted to the journal Science that
|the U.S. government wants censored, that is, details removed
|which would prevent others from duplicating the work;
Now, anyone involved in experimental or other types of research
would realize
In the context of the claimed discovery that a mutant and highly
dangerous strain of avian flu reportedly fatal in 60 per cent of human
cases has been developed by a relatively simple method in a
Netherlands science laboratory, Mike Palij asks:
How should scientists react to having the U.S.
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 01:31:01 -0800, Allen Esterson wrote:
In the context of the claimed discovery that a mutant and highly
dangerous strain of avian flu reportedly fatal in 60 per cent of human
cases has been developed by a relatively simple method in a
Netherlands science laboratory, Mike Palij
