On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Jim Schaad wrote:
>
>
>
>
> *From:* TLS [mailto:tls-boun...@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Eric Rescorla
> *Sent:* Monday, April 25, 2016 11:10 AM
> *To:* Jim Schaad
> *Cc:* tls@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [TLS] NewSessionTicketFormat - for PSK
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, A
I support adoption of this draft. No reason to limit ECDHE_PSK to CBC.
Cheers,
Andrei
-Original Message-
From: TLS [mailto:tls-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sean Turner
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 8:22 AM
To: tls
Subject: Re: [TLS] Call for WG adoption of draft-mattsson-tls-ecdhe-psk
I support the adoption of the draft.
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Salz, Rich wrote:
> I support adoption.
>
> --
> Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies
> IM: richs...@jabber.at Twitter: RichSalz
>
>
> ___
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https:
From: TLS [mailto:tls-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Eric Rescorla
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 11:10 AM
To: Jim Schaad
Cc: tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] NewSessionTicketFormat - for PSK
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Jim Schaad mailto:i...@augustcellars.com> > wrote:
I was l
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Jim Schaad wrote:
> I was looking at how TLS 1.3 was going to fit into an upgrade from the
> existing 1.2 version that is used for RADIUS and having vague memories of
> what was going on during the F2F meeting and I ended up with the following
> question.
>
> We
I was looking at how TLS 1.3 was going to fit into an upgrade from the
existing 1.2 version that is used for RADIUS and having vague memories of
what was going on during the F2F meeting and I ended up with the following
question.
We are planning to indicate in the NewSessionTicket items such as if
I support adoption.
--
Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies
IM: richs...@jabber.at Twitter: RichSalz
___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
> On 25 Apr 2016, at 22:12, Sean Turner wrote:
> - Support adoption and are willing to review/comment on the draft by
> 201600429. Note that the extensions is pretty straight forward, but the
> chairs still need people to comment on the draft as we’re processing it down
> the path.
...
>
>
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 08:12:17AM -0700, Sean Turner wrote:
> - Support adoption and are willing to review/comment on the draft
I support the adoption of this draft.
--
Viktor.
___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/l
Below are some of the more significant issues discussed at the meeting in
Buenos Aires:
1. Adopt David Benjamin's signature and hash algorithm negotiation
structure that ties both together. New code points to define signature
algorithm, curve and hash as a unit.
- PR incorporated into draft - h
On Apr 25, 2016, at 11:19 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Apr 2016, Sean Turner wrote:
>
>> draft-shore-tls-dnssec-chain-extension was originally discussed at IETF 93
>> [0], and the authors have been biding their time while the WG thrashed out
>> TLS1.3s' issues. At IETF 95, they prese
I got the dates wrong. They should both have been 20160510.
spt
> On Apr 25, 2016, at 08:12, Sean Turner wrote:
>
> All,
>
> draft-shore-tls-dnssec-chain-extension was originally discussed at IETF 93
> [0], and the authors have been biding their time while the WG thrashed out
> TLS1.3s' iss
On Mon, 25 Apr 2016, Sean Turner wrote:
draft-shore-tls-dnssec-chain-extension was originally discussed at IETF 93 [0],
and the authors have been biding their time while the WG thrashed out TLS1.3s'
issues. At IETF 95, they presented again [1], but this time the chairs took a
sense of the ro
sigh and here as well - they should have been 20160510.
spt
> On Apr 25, 2016, at 08:17, Sean Turner wrote:
>
> All,
>
> draft-mattsson-tls-ecdhe-psk-aead includes some cipher suites that are needed
> for TLS1.3. We need to get these officially registered so the chairs would
> like to hear
All,
draft-mattsson-tls-ecdhe-psk-aead includes some cipher suites that are needed
for TLS1.3. We need to get these officially registered so the chairs would
like to hear whether there is WG support for adopting
draft-mattsson-tls-ecdhe-psk-aead. Please let us know whether you:
- Support adop
All,
draft-shore-tls-dnssec-chain-extension was originally discussed at IETF 93 [0],
and the authors have been biding their time while the WG thrashed out TLS1.3s'
issues. At IETF 95, they presented again [1], but this time the chairs took a
sense of the room about whether the WG was in favor
16 matches
Mail list logo
