I support adoption of this draft. No reason to limit ECDHE_PSK to CBC. Cheers,
Andrei -----Original Message----- From: TLS [mailto:tls-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sean Turner Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 8:22 AM To: tls <tls@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [TLS] Call for WG adoption of draft-mattsson-tls-ecdhe-psk-aead sigh and here as well - they should have been 20160510. spt > On Apr 25, 2016, at 08:17, Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com> wrote: > > All, > > draft-mattsson-tls-ecdhe-psk-aead includes some cipher suites that are needed > for TLS1.3. We need to get these officially registered so the chairs would > like to hear whether there is WG support for adopting > draft-mattsson-tls-ecdhe-psk-aead. Please let us know whether you: > > - Support adoption and are willing to review/comment on the draft by > 201600429; the chairs still need people to review the draft to show there’s > support for it as we process it down the path. > > - Object to the adoption of this draft as a WG item, please respond to the > list indicating why by 201600429. > > Note 1: This draft will get published using the new rules we’ve been > concocting on the list so the IANA considerations section will get tweaked as > we settle on what words need to be included. > > Note 2: The other option is to put the registrations in the TLS1.3 spec, but > that would add four pages that I’m pretty sure no implementer is going to > read so there seems to be little point in included the registrations in the > TLS1.3 spec. And, these cipher suites do apply to TLS1.2. > > Cheers, > > J&S _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
