FWIW, the IETF LC for this has ended now and I plan
to send the approval message for the uplift to the
secretariat later today.
Thanks,
S.
On 16/03/17 20:33, Yoav Nir wrote:
> Oh, sorry. I missed that it was Informational.
>
> In that case there’s just the issue that it has ECDH ciphersuites at
Oh, sorry. I missed that it was Informational.
In that case there’s just the issue that it has ECDH ciphersuites at a time
where 4492bis is deprecating all the other ones. But some of the ciphersuites
in there are in wide enough use that it shouldn’t remain Informational.
Yes, it should be upl
This is actually uplift to PS.
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Yoav Nir wrote:
>
> On 16 Mar 2017, at 21:01, kathleen.moriarty.i...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> Please excuse typos, sent from handheld device
>
> On Mar 16, 2017, at 11:37 AM, Yoav Nir wrote:
>
>
> On 16 Mar 2017, at 17:17, Eric Re
> On 16 Mar 2017, at 21:01, kathleen.moriarty.i...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> Please excuse typos, sent from handheld device
>
>> On Mar 16, 2017, at 11:37 AM, Yoav Nir wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 16 Mar 2017, at 17:17, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi folks
>>>
>>> I note that we are proposing to
Please excuse typos, sent from handheld device
> On Mar 16, 2017, at 11:37 AM, Yoav Nir wrote:
>
>
>> On 16 Mar 2017, at 17:17, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks
>>
>> I note that we are proposing to uplift RFC 5289 to PS, despite the fact that
>> it
>> standardizes some CBC cipher sui
> On 16 Mar 2017, at 17:17, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>
> Hi folks
>
> I note that we are proposing to uplift RFC 5289 to PS, despite the fact that
> it
> standardizes some CBC cipher suites, which the WG is looking to move away
> from. I recognize that these are the only cipher suites you can use
ekr,
While we’re moving the entire document to PS, we’re also following it with
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates/ that
adds a “Recommended" column that is not (see s6) going to include marking “Y”
for any of the CBC algorithms. So, I think we’re okay.
spt
Hi folks
I note that we are proposing to uplift RFC 5289 to PS, despite the fact
that it
standardizes some CBC cipher suites, which the WG is looking to move away
from. I recognize that these are the only cipher suites you can use in TLS
1.0
and 1.1, but we also want people to move away from them.
