> On Jan 18, 2024, at 15:56, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>
> Processing those is of course worthy (probably) but so is finishing
> existing specs that've been deployed already.
The TLS WG holds the distinction for have the most reported errata (61) [0].
We need to start working through these at
> The TLS WG holds the distinction for have the most reported errata (61) [0].
> We need to start working through these at some point.
This spreadsheet is probably more useful for people who want to help out, since
only the ADs can really make conclusions as I understand it. (Errata process
do
- Green means it is done (or in hand)
- Yellow means there are questions
- White (or uncolored) means you can look at the mail archive, see if there
was a resolution and post the mail archive link to one of the columns. Put
your name in the 'I did it' column and what you think the resolution shoul
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 at 20:47, Salz, Rich
wrote:
> > The TLS WG holds the distinction for have the most reported errata (61)
> [0]. We need to start working through these at some point.
>
> This spreadsheet is probably more useful for people who want to help out,
> since only the ADs can really ma
