Re: Additional key bindings support (C-Backtick ...)

2010-04-29 Thread Nicholas Marriott
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 09:12:07PM +0100, Nicholas Marriott wrote: > On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 01:04:55PM -0700, Micah Cowan wrote: > > Nicholas Marriott wrote: > > > And it is surprising the amount of variation: I have seen others who use > > > `, or function keys, quite a few seem to go for C-x or

Re: Additional key bindings support (C-Backtick ...)

2010-04-29 Thread Nicholas Marriott
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 01:04:55PM -0700, Micah Cowan wrote: > Nicholas Marriott wrote: > > And it is surprising the amount of variation: I have seen others who use > > `, or function keys, quite a few seem to go for C-x or C-s, and some > > even for C-z. > > Using C-s sounds like asking for troub

Re: Additional key bindings support (C-Backtick ...)

2010-04-29 Thread Micah Cowan
Nicholas Marriott wrote: > And it is surprising the amount of variation: I have seen others who use > `, or function keys, quite a few seem to go for C-x or C-s, and some > even for C-z. Using C-s sounds like asking for trouble. :) > So (and I know you didn't suggest this but some people might be

Re: Additional key bindings support (C-Backtick ...)

2010-04-29 Thread Nicholas Marriott
I know you aren't advocating a change but I might as well hijack this thread a little, since I have found it quite interesting seeing what prefixes people use: What has become clear over the last few of years is that there is absolutely no consensus about the best prefix key. Quite a few people h

Re: Additional key bindings support (C-Backtick ...)

2010-04-29 Thread Micah Cowan
Martial Boniou wrote: > I presume you're ok with C-b. If not, what other prefix can you advice? No, personally I hate C-b: too much finger-stretching for such a commonly-used function. I use C-a, which I became accustomed to in screen. This works fine for me, since I use vi-mode in my shell (and v

Re: Additional key bindings support (C-Backtick ...)

2010-04-29 Thread Martial Boniou
At Thu, 29 Apr 2010 11:20:45 -0700, Micah Cowan wrote: > > Nicholas Marriott wrote: > > C-` generates the same sequence as C-space, bind that. > > And as C-@ (which is the canonical form, I think) Ah, ok! > Note that, if you ever use Emacs, C-space (or C-@ or C-`, however you > invoke it) is a

Re: Additional key bindings support (C-Backtick ...)

2010-04-29 Thread Micah Cowan
Nicholas Marriott wrote: > C-` generates the same sequence as C-space, bind that. And as C-@ (which is the canonical form, I think) Note that, if you ever use Emacs, C-space (or C-@ or C-`, however you invoke it) is a frequently-needed keybinding. -- Micah J. Cowan http://micah.cowan.name/ ---

Re: Additional key bindings support (C-Backtick ...)

2010-04-29 Thread Martial Boniou
Thanks a lot! It works. (not the first time, I tried b/c I got the old 1.1 version through a MacPorts install). I complete with the line: bind-key C-space last-window to get most of my screen behavior back. Good bye screen. Cheers, -- Martial At Thu, 29 Apr 2010 15:10:36 +0100, Nicholas Marrio

Re: Additional key bindings support (C-Backtick ...)

2010-04-29 Thread Nicholas Marriott
C-` generates the same sequence as C-space, bind that. On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 03:57:55PM +0200, Martial Boniou wrote: > Hi, > > I often use gnu screen and I would like to switch to tmux. I generally remap > my prefix to C-backquote (escape ^`` in my .screenrc). Is there a way to do > this on

Additional key bindings support (C-Backtick ...)

2010-04-29 Thread Martial Boniou
Hi, I often use gnu screen and I would like to switch to tmux. I generally remap my prefix to C-backquote (escape ^`` in my .screenrc). Is there a way to do this on tmux? I am an old school typist and I easily use C-a, C-b, C-h, C-w... during my xterm sessions so having the opportunities to typ