DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7272] New: - SSI Include munges scandinavian characters.

2002-03-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7272. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

testin 123

2002-03-20 Thread Khurram Munir
testin 123 __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5181] - HttpConnector [8080] No processor available, rejecting this connection

2002-03-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5181. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Can Reload server.xml without restarting TC !!!HELP

2002-03-20 Thread Khurram Munir
Can Tomcat reload server.xml after editing without restarting. I m adding datasource entry in server.xml programmatically and wants that my application should use that recently added datasource without restarting tomcat i m adding that in application context

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7274] New: - .lookup return null instead of valid data source.

2002-03-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7274. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Can Reload server.xml without restarting TC !!!HELP

2002-03-20 Thread Bill Barker
Not currently. The manager webapp in 4.1 (the current nightly build) may be able to help (I haven't been able to keep up with all of Amy's an Manveen's commits). - Original Message - From: Khurram Munir [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 1:19 AM

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7277] New: - request URI processing works wrong

2002-03-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7277. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup HostConfig.java

2002-03-20 Thread glenn
glenn 02/03/20 04:29:56 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core LocalStrings.properties StandardHost.java StandardHostDeployer.java catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/tomcat-docs/config host.xml

2002-03-20 Thread glenn
glenn 02/03/20 04:33:01 Modified:webapps/tomcat-docs/config host.xml Log: Add the Host deployXML attribute. If false, Context config XML files found in the Host's appBase are not deployed. Default is true. When Catalina deploys an application in runs with the security

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7052] - Security manager not initialised or accessed properly

2002-03-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7052. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7052] - Security manager not initialised or accessed properly

2002-03-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7052. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7286] New: - Tomcat addresses initially cannot be resolved without path

2002-03-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7286. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5411] - JSP session does not work with IE/IIS5/Tomcat 3.3

2002-03-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5411. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7148] - Log is not flushed

2002-03-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7148. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7287] New: - Rapid page reload succession slows Tomcat response

2002-03-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7287. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7277] - request URI processing works wrong

2002-03-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7277. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7286] - Tomcat addresses initially cannot be resolved without path

2002-03-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7286. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7274] - .lookup return null instead of valid data source.

2002-03-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7274. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7177] - Apache/mod_jk/Tomcat Connectivity Problem

2002-03-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7177. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5411] - JSP session does not work with IE/IIS5/Tomcat 3.3

2002-03-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5411. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7287] - Rapid page reload succession slows Tomcat response

2002-03-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7287. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Can Reload server.xml without restarting TC !!!HELP

2002-03-20 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Khurram Munir wrote: Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 09:19:27 + (GMT) From: Khurram Munir [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Can Reload server.xml without restarting TC !!!HELP Can Tomcat reload server.xml

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7035] - java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/omg/CosTransactions/Inactive

2002-03-20 Thread Dan Powell
So does this mean Tomcat 4.0.4 will ship with a less functional Datasource factory than previous versions? This regression would be regretful. -dan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 7:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7129] - examples webapp contains invalid taglib uri references in JSP files

2002-03-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7129. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7272] - SSI Include munges scandinavian characters.

2002-03-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7272. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

FW: JDK 1.31??

2002-03-20 Thread Pier Fumagalli
I believe this _deserves_ greater attention than webmaster... Pearls like those come once every year... Pier -- Forwarded Message From: /* NAME CONCEALED */ Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 11:48:15 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: JDK 1.31?? Hello, I purchased a server package from

RE: JDK 1.31??

2002-03-20 Thread Ryan Bloom
I would just like to state that as I Covalent employee, I disavow all knowledge of this completely. :-( Ryan -- Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] 645 Howard St. [EMAIL PROTECTED] San Francisco, CA -Original

Re: JDK 1.31??

2002-03-20 Thread Pier Fumagalli
It was not against Covalent... But rather against the user... Your instructions were concise and accurate... Even my mother could have followed them... If the guy doesn't have a clue of what a Java JDK 1.3.1 is, well, then he'd better not even touch Tomcat :) :) :) Pier Ryan Bloom [EMAIL

RE: JDK 1.31??

2002-03-20 Thread Ryan Bloom
Granted, but we could have provided more detailed instructions. Ryan -- Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] 645 Howard St. [EMAIL PROTECTED] San Francisco, CA -Original Message- From: Pier Fumagalli [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: JDK 1.31??

2002-03-20 Thread Federico Barbieri
Ryan Bloom wrote: Granted, but we could have provided more detailed instructions. Ryan not if he paid you over a year ago! assistance costs... :-) Federico -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5181] - HttpConnector [8080] No processor available, rejecting this connection

2002-03-20 Thread GOMEZ Henri
excellent technical analyze. should be present in tomcat faq - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 -Original

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7227] - error-code directive don't work

2002-03-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7227. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7177] - Apache/mod_jk/Tomcat Connectivity Problem

2002-03-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7177. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: tomcat 4.0.3 + mod_jk

2002-03-20 Thread GOMEZ Henri
in mod_jk, when a session is created the following requests will allways go to the same tomcat. IBM call it Session Affinity ;) Hi, is it possible to use only the session routing of mod_jk without load balancing? Because we have a standalone loadbalancer in front of our cluster. In the past

RE: config

2002-03-20 Thread GOMEZ Henri
I can see that this is going to make life difficult for ApacheConfig. Yes, hopefully we can deprecate it soon. But in the mean time, I'd personally prefer that the port is a property of the worker.ajp13. So your example would be: worker.ajp13.channel=socket worker.ajp13.port=8009

[VOTE] Final release of Tomcat 3.3.1

2002-03-20 Thread Larry Isaacs
I believe it is an appropriate time to release the HEAD of jakarta-tomcat as Tomcat 3.3.1. Also, as part of this release, I play to sync up the jakarta-tomcat-connectors/utils to ensure that there are no regressions in its tomcat-utils.jar with respect to the one in Tomcat 3.3.1.

RE: [VOTE] Final release of Tomcat 3.3.1

2002-03-20 Thread GOMEZ Henri
+1 (and all I can do with a broken wrist ;( Vote to release jakarta-tomcat HEAD as Tomcat 3.3.1 [ ] +1 I am in favor of the release, and will help support it [ ] +0 I am in favor of the release, but am unable to help support it. [ ] -0 I not in favor of the release [ ] -1 I am opposed to

Re: [VOTE] Final release of Tomcat 3.3.1

2002-03-20 Thread costinm
On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Larry Isaacs wrote: I believe it is an appropriate time to release the HEAD of jakarta-tomcat as Tomcat 3.3.1. Also, as part of this release, I play to sync up the jakarta-tomcat-connectors/utils to ensure that there are no regressions in its tomcat-utils.jar with

RE: config

2002-03-20 Thread costinm
On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote: could we use for example worker.ajp13.channel=socket,8009 worker.ajp13.channel=unix,path The problem is that the communication channel and the protocol are distinct entities. You can add a new channel with it's own properties ( like JNI, or

Re: [VOTE] Final release of Tomcat 3.3.1

2002-03-20 Thread Bojan Smojver
On Thu, 2002-03-21 at 08:20, Larry Isaacs wrote: I believe it is an appropriate time to release the HEAD of jakarta-tomcat as Tomcat 3.3.1. Also, as part of this release, I play to sync up the jakarta-tomcat-connectors/utils to ensure that there are no regressions in its tomcat-utils.jar

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector HttpRequestBase.java

2002-03-20 Thread remm
remm02/03/20 15:10:00 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector HttpRequestBase.java Log: - Fix a bug when using the old connectors: the new decoded URI field wasn't properly recycled. Bug reported by Jian Cai. Revision

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common jk_worker_ajp13.c jk_ajp14_worker.c

2002-03-20 Thread costin
costin 02/03/20 15:38:51 Added: jk/native2/common jk_worker_ajp13.c Removed: jk/native2/common jk_ajp14_worker.c Log: Renamed the ajp worker to follow the rest of the code naming scheme. Also reverted back to ajp13 - all 14 extensions will consist on additional

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common jk_worker_lb.c jk_lb_worker.c

2002-03-20 Thread costin
costin 02/03/20 15:39:36 Added: jk/native2/common jk_worker_lb.c Removed: jk/native2/common jk_lb_worker.c Log: Renamed to follow the same naming scheme with the rest of the code. Revision ChangesPath 1.1

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common jk_requtil.c

2002-03-20 Thread costin
costin 02/03/20 15:41:32 Modified:jk/native2/common jk_requtil.c Log: Moved the printf and other request utils. This acts like a 'base' jk_service object, providing common functions used on the request. Revision ChangesPath 1.10 +321 -4

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common jk_env.c jk_logger_file.c jk_uriEnv.c jk_workerEnv.c

2002-03-20 Thread costin
costin 02/03/20 15:44:37 Modified:jk/native2/common jk_env.c jk_logger_file.c jk_uriEnv.c jk_workerEnv.c Log: Various small fixes. Revision ChangesPath 1.12 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_env.c Index:

Re: [VOTE] Final release of Tomcat 3.3.1

2002-03-20 Thread Remy Maucherat
I believe it is an appropriate time to release the HEAD of jakarta-tomcat as Tomcat 3.3.1. Also, as part of this release, I play to sync up the jakarta-tomcat-connectors/utils to ensure that there are no regressions in its tomcat-utils.jar with respect to the one in Tomcat 3.3.1.

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5181] - HttpConnector [8080] No processor available, rejecting this connection

2002-03-20 Thread Remy Maucherat
excellent technical analyze. should be present in tomcat faq Yes. AFAIK, there's no FAQ, though :-( Remy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Final release of Tomcat 3.3.1

2002-03-20 Thread Bill Barker
-- Vote to release jakarta-tomcat HEAD as Tomcat 3.3.1 [X] +1 I am in favor of the release, and will help support it [ ] +0 I am in favor of the release, but am unable to help support it. [ ] -0 I not in favor of the

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5181] - HttpConnector [8080] No processor available, rejecting this connection

2002-03-20 Thread Punky Tse
How about create a new doc titled Tunning/Troubleshooting and add to Tomcat doc? Punky - Original Message - From: GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 4:14 AM Subject: RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5181] - HttpConnector [8080]

Re: [VOTE] Final release of Tomcat 3.3.1

2002-03-20 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Larry Isaacs wrote: -- Vote to release jakarta-tomcat HEAD as Tomcat 3.3.1 [ ] +1 I am in favor of the release, and will help support it [X] +0 I am in favor of the release, but am unable to

RE: config

2002-03-20 Thread GOMEZ Henri
worker.ajp13.channel=socket,8009 worker.ajp13.channel=unix,path The problem is that the communication channel and the protocol are distinct entities. that's why the channel have no one parm, but a principal, socket, and extras qualifying it. it could be also :

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5181] - HttpConnector [8080] No processor available, rejecting this connection

2002-03-20 Thread GOMEZ Henri
good idea, and adding the technical analisys of glenn is mandatory ;) - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 -Original