DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22677] New: - JNDI not working in Default Context

2003-08-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: IP address Assignment problem

2003-08-23 Thread Reshat Sabiq
Ayoub Raffoul wrote: Hello, I'm running Apache Tomcat ver. 4.1 on a Windows 2000 server. The machine has multipe IP addresses. I have configured Apache Tomcat in server.xml to run on a specific IP address port 80 as follows (fake IP address): port="80" minProcessors="5" ma

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22626] - Removing a webapp(context) doesn'tclose its datasources(resource)

2003-08-23 Thread Dirk Verbeeck
Then maybe we should define an extended interface or something. - the factory implements a destroy method that can be used - the resource implements Closeable then it can be closed - an eventlistener is registered by the factory to do the cleanup - a Runnable object is bound with JNDI name "shutdow

Auto-Confirmation

2003-08-23 Thread Quest Software
Thank you for submitting your request to Quest Software Technical Support. We are unable to process your request because our records indicate that you are not registered for Technical Support. To register, logon to our Supportlink web site http://www.quest.com/support , and self-register from

Auto-Confirmation

2003-08-23 Thread Quest Software
Thank you for submitting your request to Quest Software Technical Support. We are unable to process your request because our records indicate that you are not registered for Technical Support. To register, logon to our Supportlink web site http://www.quest.com/support , and self-register from

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22673] New: - cannot run "catalina.sh debug"

2003-08-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating

2003-08-23 Thread Tim Funk
Installed 5.0.9 from exe (win2k) 1) startup.bat worked fine, but the icon which calls tomcatw.exe" //GT//Tomcat5 fails will some "Current Thread not owner error" 2) Race conditions and connection handling in JDBCRealm - plus a whole host of other JDBCRealm bugs in Bugzilla applicable to 4 and 5.

Need help for workers2.properties file

2003-08-23 Thread EPC
Hi, I'm using mod_jk2 with Tomcat 5 (Alpha) & Apache 2, running successfully. But regarding the "workers2.properties" file I have few queries. It would be great, if you can comment on them. [shm] file=${serverRoot}/logs/shm.file size=1048576 Q : What exactly above line indicates ? What this *si

>> tomcat4 / jk2 / apache2 / mod_rewrite <

2003-08-23 Thread admin
hello list, I have a working apache2/tomcat/jk2 setup that is running 1 webapp. (this setup is running on RedHat9 if that matters...) My search engine optimization company is asking us to use mod_rewrite to make the URLs more SE friendly. So, we are trying to get mod_rewrite setup to do just that

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22645] New: - <%@ include file ="included.jsp" %> encoding problem

2003-08-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating

2003-08-23 Thread Remy Maucherat
Remy Maucherat wrote: [ ] Alpha [X] Beta Unlike 5.0.8, I haven't found any problems with this build, other than the two issues I mentioned. Remy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [E

Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating

2003-08-23 Thread Remy Maucherat
Bill Barker wrote: 1) The admin webapp lies about Connector properties. Yes, I mentioned that. To be accurate, I don't think the admin webapp has ever been glitch free in any release. 2) Authorization isn't spec-compliant (I mis-read the spec when I did it). However, I heard a rumor that the spec

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22626] New: - Removing a webapp(context) doesn't close its datasources(resource)

2003-08-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22625] - Removing a webapp(context) doesn't close its datasources(resource)

2003-08-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] 5.0.9 stability rating

2003-08-23 Thread Bill Barker
Just realized that I marked the wrong box (d*** hanging chads :). Changing my vote to 'Alpha' for reasons given below. "Bill Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - Original Message - > From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Tomcat Developers L

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22645] - <%@ include file ="included.jsp" %> encoding problem

2003-08-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu