Re: DefaultServlet and getOutputStream() / getWriter()

Responder, The email address you have contacted is no longer active. Please use your company’s user log-in to www.apparelmagic.com/support to contact the ApparelMagic Support Department. Thank you. - To unsubscrib

DefaultServlet and getOutputStream() / getWriter()

Hi I am reviewing the source code of the DefaultServlet. I do not understand the following: // slightly modified from source of "serveResource". ServletOutputStream ostream = null; PrintWriter writer = null; try { ostream = response.getOutputStream(); } catch (Ille

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30774] - mod_jk2: It is not possible to set the AJP port to anything other than the default of 8009

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: TCKs for 4.1.31

Hey Keith, Hey Amy, would you mind running the TCKs against the 4.1.31 rc? http://apache.org/~keith/rc2/ How does one go about obtaining these tests? I only have the TCKs for the latest specs Servlet 2.4/JSP2.0 so it won't be compatible with Tomcat 4.1. I believe Apache has contacts that have ac

Re: JK Todo List

From: "Mladen Turk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Remy Maucherat wrote: > >>> Over all, I don't, personally, think that it's worth trying to build > >>> on the existing Jk code base. However, if you have an itch > >> > >> Well, we deceased JK2, for Apache2.1 we have proxy_ajp. > >> Until Apache2.1 bec

Getting Tomcat Tests

Where can I find test cases I can use to verify that my changes to the Coyote Connector haven't broken anything? I work for Unisys corporation, and we are modifying the Coyote Connector to integrate Tomcat 5.0.28 with our native HTTP server on MCP systems ("mainframe" systems with origins in th

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.1.31

From: "Keith Wannamaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [X] Stable > I tested connector bugs 20184 & 24763 are fixed with this release. All the major branches have this fix now (3.x 4.1 and 5.x). I'm now aware that this release passes all the watchdog tests, too. -Kurt ---

[GUMP@brutus]: Project jakarta-tomcat-catalina (in Module jakarta-tomcat-catalina) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project jakarta-tomcat-catalina has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

Re: JK Todo List

Remy Maucherat wrote: Over all, I don't, personally, think that it's worth trying to build on the existing Jk code base. However, if you have an itch Well, we deceased JK2, for Apache2.1 we have proxy_ajp. Until Apache2.1 becomes the only server around the net, I'll stick with JK for all thos

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31439] - Manager webapp cannot undeploy defunct webapp

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: JK Todo List

Mladen Turk wrote: Bill Barker wrote: Over all, I don't, personally, think that it's worth trying to build on the existing Jk code base. However, if you have an itch Well, we deceased JK2, for Apache2.1 we have proxy_ajp. Until Apache2.1 becomes the only server around the net, I'll stick wit

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core NamingContextListener.java LocalStrings.properties

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: remm2004/10/08 02:34:02 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core NamingContextListener.java LocalStrings.properties Log: - Register datasource with JMX. - With DBCP, this is enough to provide JMX management and monitoring.

Re: JK Todo List

Bill Barker wrote: Over all, I don't, personally, think that it's worth trying to build on the existing Jk code base. However, if you have an itch Well, we deceased JK2, for Apache2.1 we have proxy_ajp. Until Apache2.1 becomes the only server around the net, I'll stick with JK for all those

Re: JK Todo List

Over all, I don't, personally, think that it's worth trying to build on the existing Jk code base. However, if you have an itch - Original Message - From: "Mladen Turk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 4:28 AM Subjec

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29521] - No destroy methods called on service shutdown

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: JK Todo List

Remy Maucherat wrote: - Backport JNI from JK2 with lots improvements. I still don't see benefits in JNI as a transport for JK. Only trouble (no matter how I look at it, it seems like it would actually make the whole system much less robust) and complexity. Did I miss something ? I have to agree

Re: Problems with SSL_CLIENT_CERT_CHAIN_n from servlet

Yes, it is a known problem that using the AJP/1.3 Connector isn't spec-complient. The Ajp13 protocol is still stuck at Servlet v2.2, and only exposes one cert. - Original Message - From: "Jesús Luna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTE

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31473] - Windows installer for tomcat 5.5 mess up with tomcat 5.0 service

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: JK Todo List

Remy Maucherat wrote: - Backport JNI from JK2 with lots improvements. I still don't see benefits in JNI as a transport for JK. Only trouble (no matter how I look at it, it seems like it would actually make the whole system much less robust) and complexity. Did I miss something ? The JNI was not

Re: JK Todo List

Mladen Turk wrote: Hi, Here is my Todo List for JK: - Documentation - Use Apache coding style (already done 90%) using simple .indent.pro - Fix all 64/32 bit compatibility issues. - Backport IIS Worker thread pool from JK2. - Backport some ajp messaging stuff from proxy_ajp (mostly performance). -

Re: ajp_proxy and unix-socket

May be we could ask us to work on this ? porting them from jk2 to jk is a good idea On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 11:06:08 +0200, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Henri Gomez wrote: > > Hi to all, > > > > Did there is plan to add unix-socket support in ajp_proxy ? > > > > Some people seems to use

Re: JK Todo List

+1, will help as much as possible On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 13:28:49 +0200, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Here is my Todo List for JK: > > - Documentation > - Use Apache coding style (already done 90%) using simple .indent.pro > - Fix all 64/32 bit compatibility issues. > - Backpor

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31581] - Tomcat Manager deploys the web application twice

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31581] - Tomcat Manager deploys the web application twice

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26523] - StandardEngine make two init() calls at sub Mbeans

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

JK Todo List

Hi, Here is my Todo List for JK: - Documentation - Use Apache coding style (already done 90%) using simple .indent.pro - Fix all 64/32 bit compatibility issues. - Backport IIS Worker thread pool from JK2. - Backport some ajp messaging stuff from proxy_ajp (mostly performance). - Backport shared mem

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native CHANGES.txt

mturk 2004/10/08 04:08:47 Modified:jk/native CHANGES.txt Log: Recent changes to jk. Revision ChangesPath 1.22 +7 -1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/CHANGES.txt Index: CHANGES.txt ===

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/iis jk_isapi_plugin.c

mturk 2004/10/08 03:37:12 Modified:jk/native/iis jk_isapi_plugin.c Log: Remove computing properties file on each dll event. Fix reporting error page to client, and few compile time warnigs. Revision ChangesPath 1.25 +43 -38jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core NamingContextListener.java LocalStrings.properties

remm2004/10/08 02:34:02 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core NamingContextListener.java LocalStrings.properties Log: - Register datasource with JMX. - With DBCP, this is enough to provide JMX management and monitoring. It might work well

Re: ajp_proxy and unix-socket

Henri Gomez wrote: Hi to all, Did there is plan to add unix-socket support in ajp_proxy ? Some people seems to use JK2 for the quick unix-socket and wonder if they could use them in mod_proxy/ajp_proxy. BTW, since ajp_proxy is 100% APR it should be easier ? Think that APR doesn't support AF_UNIX. M

RE: Problems with SSL_CLIENT_CERT_CHAIN_n from servlet

> -Mensaje original- > De: jean-frederic clere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Enviado el: viernes, 08 de octubre de 2004 8:28 > Para: Jesús Luna > Asunto: Re: Problems with SSL_CLIENT_CERT_CHAIN_n from servlet > > > I have not (yet) got it working but the idea to have more httpd variables > av

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/netscape jk_nsapi_plugin.c

mturk 2004/10/08 01:55:14 Modified:jk/native/apache-1.3 mod_jk.c jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c jk/native/domino dsapifilter.h inifile.c inifile.h jk_dsapi_plugin.c jk/native/iis jk_isapi_plugin.c jk/nat

ajp_proxy and unix-socket

Hi to all, Did there is plan to add unix-socket support in ajp_proxy ? Some people seems to use JK2 for the quick unix-socket and wonder if they could use them in mod_proxy/ajp_proxy. BTW, since ajp_proxy is 100% APR it should be easier ? Regards ---

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common jk_ajp12_worker.c jk_ajp13.c jk_ajp13_worker.c jk_ajp14.c jk_ajp14_worker.c jk_ajp_common.c jk_connect.c jk_context.c jk_jni_worker.c jk_lb_worker.c jk_map.c jk_md5.c jk_msg_buff.c jk_nwmain.c jk_pool.c jk_sockbuf.c jk_uri_worker_map.c jk_util.c jk_worker.c jk_ajp12_worker.h jk_ajp13.h jk_ajp13_worker.h jk_ajp14.h jk_ajp14_worker.h jk_ajp_common.h jk_connect.h jk_context.h jk_global.h jk_jni_worker.h jk_lb_worker.h jk_logger.h jk_map.h jk_md5.h jk_msg_buff.h jk_mt.h jk_pool.h jk_service.h jk_sockbuf.h jk_uri_worker_map.h jk_util.h jk_version.h jk_worker.h jk_worker_list.h

mturk 2004/10/08 00:50:41 Modified:jk/native/common jk_ajp12_worker.c jk_ajp13.c jk_ajp13_worker.c jk_ajp14.c jk_ajp14_worker.c jk_ajp_common.c jk_connect.c jk_context.c jk_jni_worker.c jk_lb_worker.c jk_map.c jk_m

Automated reply from h4host@www.h4host.com

Attention: A Spyware or virus was found in an Email message you sent. This Email scanner intercepted it and stopped the entire message reaching its destination. Please update your Spyware or virus scanner or contact your IT support personnel as soon as possible as you have a virus or Spyware

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31590] - Problem deploying a WAR with a META-INF/context.xml file

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common .indent.pro

mturk 2004/10/08 00:34:44 Added: jk/native/common .indent.pro Log: Indent file for mod_jk. Revision ChangesPath 1.1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common/.indent.pro Index: .indent.pro ==

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31590] - Problem deploying a WAR with a META-INF/context.xml file

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common jk_ajp14_worker.c

mturk 2004/10/08 00:18:04 Modified:jk/native/common jk_ajp14_worker.c Log: Comment the login service for now. Revision ChangesPath 1.20 +4 -1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common/jk_ajp14_worker.c Index: jk_ajp14_worker.c =

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common jk_md5.h

mturk 2004/10/08 00:23:51 Modified:jk/native/common jk_md5.h Log: Int is not 32 bits on all platforms. Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +12 -4 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common/jk_md5.h Index: jk_md5.h ==

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common jk_md5.c

mturk 2004/10/08 00:22:58 Modified:jk/native/common jk_md5.c Log: Untabify the source code Revision ChangesPath 1.10 +119 -135 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common/jk_md5.c Index: jk_md5.c ==

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common jk_util.c

mturk 2004/10/08 00:20:33 Modified:jk/native/common jk_util.c Log: Untabify the source and use size_t for strlens. Revision ChangesPath 1.29 +26 -26jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common/jk_util.c Index: jk_util.c

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common jk_uri_worker_map.c

mturk 2004/10/08 00:19:34 Modified:jk/native/common jk_uri_worker_map.c Log: Untabify the source. Revision ChangesPath 1.22 +58 -59jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common/jk_uri_worker_map.c Index: jk_uri_worker_map.c =

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31590] - Problem deploying a WAR with a META-INF/context.xml file

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu