I just recently upgraded to Tomcat 5.0.28 and it seems to really be
cooking compared to my older version, which was not that old. Nice
work!
--
You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back.
~Dakota Jack~
Dear customer,
We regret to tell you we have not found you in our database with the
information you provided us.
If you write from one of the countries that appear in our web site
(www.pandasoftware.com -- Click on the tab Partners -On the left to the
screen click Global Partnerships- Select
markt 2005/05/22 10:12:11
Modified:http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11
Http11AprProcessor.java Http11AprProtocol.java
Http11Processor.java Http11Protocol.java
Log:
Implement request body replay action.
Use new maxSavePostSize
markt 2005/05/22 10:14:29
Added: http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/filters
SavedRequestInputFilter.java
Log:
Implement request body replay action.
New input filter used to insert the request body.
Revision ChangesPath
1.1
markt 2005/05/22 10:18:28
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/authenticator
FormAuthenticator.java LocalStrings.properties
catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector
Connector.java
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
markt 2005/05/22 10:14:29
Added: http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/filters
SavedRequestInputFilter.java
Log:
Implement request body replay action.
New input filter used to insert the request body.
This is probably not
Remy Maucherat wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Implement request body replay action.
New input filter used to insert the request body.
This is probably not going to work with the APR protocol, since a
subsequent request may be processed by a different processor.
All this proves saving
Mark Thomas wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
The input filter is added to the processor during the processing of the
final request in the FORM authentication sequence and the data in it is
consumed during the processing of this request. There is no need for
this filter, or the data in it, to
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
If this still goes to the session, then the -1 is not justified.
It does still go to the session.
The
code is not done in a way that is very intuitive to me, so that's the
only issue then, and it's not relevant.
It wasn't that intuitive to me
Mark Thomas wrote:
I took a particularly paranoid view and set the default to 4k.
I see this was in the next commit. Great default.
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34771.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Ich werde ab 21.05.2005 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am
30.05.2005.
Ich werde Ihre Nachricht nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten. In dringenden
Fällen wenden Sie sich bitte Herrn Bagehorn
([EMAIL PROTECTED]). Herr Bagehorn hat die Rufnummer
0571/93425-80) Ab Montag, den 23.05.2005
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35014.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
13 matches
Mail list logo