Re: (movie)

2004-05-01 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (the list manager says [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not subscribed) Is it subscribed to the -allow list? http://www.ezmlm.org/ezman-0.32/ezman2.html#ss2.4 and related info on that page may help. That was indeed

Re: [GUMP@lsd]: jakarta-tomcat/jakarta-tomcat failed

2004-02-05 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Quoting Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project: jakarta-tomcat State: Failed URL: http://lsd.student.utwente.nl/gump/jakarta-tomcat/jakarta-tomcat.html - G U M P Y Please remove whatever configuration settings are implying to Gump or Gumpy

Re: [GUMP@lsd]: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jakarta-tomcat-jk-native2 failed

2004-02-03 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Quoting Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project: jakarta-tomcat-jk-native2 State: Failed URL: http://lsd.student.utwente.nl/gump/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jakarta-tomcat-jk-native2.html - G U M P Y Please remove whatever configuration

Test [was: Re: The Mailing List Parrot.]

2004-02-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Quoting NormW [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Good morning All. There seems to be a bug on your mail server because every message I send gets echoed (good), along with two others from xAT.sci.de with the same topic field but reporting undelivered messages (bad). Since this effect only occurs off the

Re: Test [was: Re: The Mailing List Parrot.]

2004-02-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Quoting Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Quoting NormW [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Good morning All. There seems to be a bug on your mail server because every message I send gets echoed (good), along with two others from xAT.sci.de with the same topic field but reporting undelivered

Re: Jakarta Collections 3.0?

2004-02-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Quoting Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED]: If I remember correctly ( and if it didn't change ), tomcat needs modeler in a parent classloader. Modeler has an optional dependency on digester, which depends on beanutils and collections. They both depend on logging, and modeler also depends

Re: Using Struts in Tomcat

2003-12-24 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Quoting geek J [EMAIL PROTECTED]: How to and where to place Struts 1.1 package in Tomcat If I need to work on Struts framework using JSP.? Do I need to configure anything more in my classpath to work struts.? Do I need any app developer seperately.? You should plan including struts.jar (and

Re: Tomcat sessions at ApacheCon

2003-11-24 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Quoting Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]: * Performance and optimization (Glenn) * JSP 2.0 (Mark Roth) - well, not really about TC * Jasper from TC 5 (Kin-Man) * TC 5 new features (JF + Craig) - Craig has had nothing to do with TC for a while, I wonder what he'll be talking about Basically

Re: [5.0] Property replacement

2003-10-17 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, I'd like to make a small proposal to do property replacement. Included are changes that should be made in the digester, and that I'll post on commons-dev if I have approval. - Add a get/setProperty to Container. This would allow a property inheritance across

Re: [5.0] System properties in server.xml (and elsewhere)

2003-10-15 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, I think it would be possible, using a new rule, to allow system properties inside server.xml (and possibly elsewhere) for attribute values. This is the same as what is being done by Ant in its build scripts. This would add an additional degree of configurability to

Re: Digester and external entities with systemId only : Was: Important requirement : Re: [next] What's next ?

2003-10-14 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Henri Gomez wrote: I traced TC 5.0 and Digester and suspect what could be the problem with external entities when only SYTEM is defined ie : !ENTITY appset1 SYSTEM appset1.xml !ENTITY appset2 SYSTEM appset2.xml In Digester.java, at least in the 1.5 release, resolveEntity return null if publicId

Re: Important requirement : Re: [next] What's next ?

2003-10-13 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Henri Gomez wrote: CF w3c.org ... relative URIs are relative to the location of the resource within which the entity declaration occurs. http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml#sec-external-ent As long as Tomcat uses the Digester.parse() entry point that takes an InputSource, and properly specifies the

Re: [next] What's next ?

2003-10-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Henri Gomez wrote: Jean-Francois Arcand a écrit : Henri Gomez wrote: Henri Gomez a écrit : 3. Provide a complete working configuration example for a cluster of tomcat servers with a front-end tomcat as well, i.e. a pure tomcat-only solution. We already have the jvmRoute mechanism, but I

Re: Logging filter (was RE: [next] What's next ?)

2003-10-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
joe user wrote: --- Shapira, Yoav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. Convert AccessLogValve to be a servlet specification 2.3 filter, i.e. something portable. We can define it in $CATALINA_HOME/conf/web.xml, commented out by default perhaps, and users can move the definition around as they need

Re: Logging filter (was RE: [next] What's next ?)

2003-10-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Shapira, Yoav wrote: Howdy, --- Shapira, Yoav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. Convert AccessLogValve to be a servlet specification 2.3 filter, i.e. That sounds wonderful and useful, but there are a few problems here. Filters don't have access to all the information that is needed to

Re: Do not email me. Remove me.

2003-09-16 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, www.cmttrading.com wrote: Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 16:01:27 -0700 From: www.cmttrading.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Do not email me. Remove me. Do not email me. Remove me.

Re: [5.0] Planning

2003-09-08 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Remy Maucherat wrote: Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 16:48:52 +0200 From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [5.0] Planning Shapira, Yoav wrote: Howdy, Seems like a

Re: [5.0] Listeners change

2003-08-14 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Sat, 9 Aug 2003, Remy Maucherat wrote: Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2003 15:29:09 +0200 From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [5.0] Listeners change Right now, all the webapp events are put in

Re: Validation of the server.xml

2003-08-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Sat, 2 Aug 2003, Yoko Kamei Harada wrote: Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2003 11:23:23 +0900 (JST) From: Yoko Kamei Harada [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Validation of the server.xml From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Validation of the server.xml

2003-08-01 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Sabine Winkler wrote: Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 10:15:46 +0200 From: Sabine Winkler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Validation of the server.xml hi there, may be, this isn't

Re: [5.0] Tester

2003-07-18 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Remy Maucherat wrote: Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 11:30:35 +0200 From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [5.0] Tester I have put the tester back in activity for TC 5

Re: How to get the container within an instance event?

2003-07-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Angus Mezick wrote: Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 15:08:33 -0400 From: Angus Mezick [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: How to get the container within an instance event? Does anyone know how

Re: Patches for catalina.sh

2003-06-25 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Ronald Klop wrote: Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 11:29:49 +0200 From: Ronald Klop [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Patches for catalina.sh And while your at it can you look at the

RE: [5.0] Commons dependencies

2003-06-05 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Shapira, Yoav wrote: Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 09:05:22 -0400 From: Shapira, Yoav [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [5.0] Commons dependencies Howdy, - modeler: Basis for

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/realmRealmBase.java

2003-05-28 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 28 May 2003, Remy Maucherat wrote: Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 00:13:31 +0200 From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: cvs commit:

RE: Http version error

2003-03-25 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Sean Reilly wrote: Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 15:14:06 -0600 From: Sean Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Http version error Unless you formatted the email strangely, you

Re: domain-wide session cookies?

2003-03-24 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Aditya wrote: Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 21:40:20 -0800 From: Aditya [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: domain-wide session cookies? Under Tomcat-4 it looks like the session cookie is set in:

Re: [5.0] [PROPOSAL] Extra web.xml to declare compiled JSPs

2003-03-24 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Remy Maucherat wrote: Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 12:05:26 +0100 From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [5.0] [PROPOSAL] Extra web.xml to declare compiled JSPs Hi,

Re: domain-wide session cookies?

2003-03-24 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
), Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Under Tomcat-4 it looks like the session cookie is set in: org/apache/catalina/connector/HttpResponseBase.java and the code that sets it uses the default domain (which is equal to the request hostname.domain.tld) when it sets the session

Re: Filter access to response object [was Re: domain-wide sessioncookies?]

2003-03-24 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
?] On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 14:10:59 -0800 (PST), Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Sharing a session across virtual hosts violates the Servlet spec (Section 7.3 - HttpSession objects must be scoped at the application (or servlet context) level and Section 3.6 - Servlet contexts can

RE: Tomcat-user

2003-03-19 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Mladen Turk wrote: Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 18:45:05 +0100 From: Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Tomcat Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Tomcat-user -Original

Re: Request to Fix Tomcat Standalone 302 redirect Issue

2003-02-17 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Donald Ball wrote: Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 11:44:16 -0500 From: Donald Ball [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Request to Fix Tomcat Standalone 302 redirect Issue Tim Funk

Re: Shutdown.sh does not work when long lasting operations, such asSQL Queries, are still active!

2003-02-10 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Tim Funk wrote: Why is a kill done instead of a System.exit()? System.exit() is absolutely the wrong answer if Tomcat is embedded into a larger server-side application, rather than run separately in the usual way. At best, you would need to make this configurable

RE: Need review -- WIN32 procrun

2003-02-06 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Mladen Turk wrote: Access denied: Insufficient Karma (mturk|jakarta-commons-sandbox/daemon/src/native/nt/procrun/) Fixed -- this should work for you now. Craig - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: help for a realm author

2003-02-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, Tony Dahbura wrote: Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2003 15:56:01 -0500 From: Tony Dahbura [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: help for a realm author Team: When tomcat is configured to support

Re: authentication and filters

2003-01-31 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 15:52:57 -0500 (EST) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: authentication and filters I have narrowed down my problem:

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/mbeansMBeanUtils.java

2003-01-27 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On 28 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: 28 Jan 2003 05:29:22 - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/mbeans MBeanUtils.java

Re: Cleanup of javax.servlet.context.tempdir

2003-01-27 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, Glenn Nielsen wrote: Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 11:11:29 -0600 From: Glenn Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cleanup of

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasperJspC.java

2003-01-22 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Hans Bergsten wrote: See my previous mail; you do _not_ need to have a package statement for the generated servlet class. Adding it just complicates life. There is a situation when *not* having the package statement can cause big problems for users. The JSP spec

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasperJspC.java

2003-01-22 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Hans Bergsten wrote: Again, I'm only talking about JSPC here; I'm not arguing for removing the package name that JspServlet adds. From a usability perspective, having JSPC work differently (in this regard) from runtime compilation doesn't seem like a good idea. A page

Re: Strange Cookie behavior with ie 6 and subdomains

2003-01-13 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Michael Wyraz wrote: Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:00:45 +0100 From: Michael Wyraz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Strange Cookie behavior with ie 6 and subdomains Hi! I did

Re: Valve question

2003-01-13 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Filip Hanik wrote: Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 20:00:13 -0800 From: Filip Hanik [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Valve question hi, is it possible from the valve to get hold of the

RE: Valve question

2003-01-13 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Filip Hanik wrote: Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 21:13:16 -0800 From: Filip Hanik [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Valve question what places can I define valve in? You mean in

Re: Duplicate session IDs are *common*

2003-01-08 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Costin Manolache wrote: Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 19:37:28 -0800 From: Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Duplicate session IDs are *common* Schnitzer, Jeff wrote: For whatever

Re: Duplicate session IDs are *common*

2003-01-08 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Aditya wrote: Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 22:36:58 -0800 From: Aditya [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Duplicate session IDs are *common* On Wed, 08 Jan 2003 19:37:28 -0800,

Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat doc organization

2003-01-07 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Glenn Nielsen wrote: Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2003 21:35:12 -0600 From: Glenn Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat doc organization If you follow the tomcat-user list there are many

RE: error-page status codes broken, no response to bugzilla report

2003-01-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Donald Ball wrote: Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 10:26:10 -0500 From: Donald Ball [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: error-page status codes broken, no response to bugzilla report

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/xdocs/jk workershowto.xml

2003-01-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Costin Manolache wrote: Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 09:23:49 -0800 From: Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/xdocs/jk workershowto.xml Are you

RE: error-page status codes broken, no response to bugzilla report

2003-01-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
to bugzilla report On 1/2/2003 at 9:23 AM Craig R. McClanahan wrote: Nonetheless, I think the patched behavior is much more correct than the current behavior and should be applied to cvs. (Sorry for being out of touch earlier -- holidays and busyness and such). I do not agree

Re: [PATCH] Re: ThreadPool

2002-12-30 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, Joseph Shraibman wrote: Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 14:00:57 -0500 From: Joseph Shraibman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: ThreadPool Craig R. McClanahan wrote

Re: [PATCH] Re: ThreadPool

2002-12-30 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, Costin Manolache wrote: As for someone stoping the check for class modification at run time using an admin interface - what's wrong with that ? I don't see a problem with that, but I've stopped using reloadable at all for my development -- reload-on-demand (via

Re: [PATCH] Re: ThreadPool

2002-12-30 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, Costin Manolache wrote: Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 13:02:09 -0800 From: Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: ThreadPool Craig R. McClanahan wrote: I like using the custom

Re: [PROPOSAL] EL Transition to Jakarta Commons

2002-12-18 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
+1, but you'll probably also want to post this on COMMONS-DEV :-). Craig On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Jan Luehe wrote: Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 09:48:34 -0800 (PST) From: Jan Luehe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jan Luehe [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat modules

2002-12-05 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: Ok, so to paraphrase: - Catalina core: stays in j-t-catalina/catalina - Modules which use the Catalina API: j-t-catalina/modules (or by component name, like j-t-catalina/cluster ?) Or maybe j-t-catalina/modules/cluster so that the individual

Re: [VOTE] Making JMX required in tomcat5

2002-12-04 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Costin Manolache wrote: Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 12:22:18 -0800 From: Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [VOTE] Making JMX required in tomcat5 The subject should be clear. The benefit is

Re: Strange Tomcat 4.1.x release versions

2002-12-03 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Jon Scott Stevens wrote: Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 11:29:54 -0800 From: Jon Scott Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta Project Management Committee List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tomcat-dev [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Jakarta Project Management Committee List [EMAIL

Re: Tomcat App. Dev. Guide

2002-12-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 15:22:47 +1100 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Tomcat App. Dev. Guide

Re: CreateContext Error using Tomcat Admin

2002-12-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
PLEASE do not cross-post messages to both TOMCAT-DEV and TOMCAT-USER. Your series of questions have been user related, and are appropriate on TOMCAT-USER. They are not appropriate on TOMCAT-DEV, which is about the development of Tomcat itself. Craig On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Laxmikanth M.S. wrote:

Re: Filter in Tomcat 3.3.1

2002-12-01 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Please do not cross-post questions on both the DEV and USER lists. In particular, this is a USER list sort of question. On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Laxmikanth M.S. wrote: Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 17:49:09 +0530 From: Laxmikanth M.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [5] [Proposal] Adding an authorization interface

2002-11-27 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote: I would like to create a new interface called Authorizator(and a default AuthorizatorBase) that will take care of those methods. I'd be a lot more willing to buy in to Authorizer and AuthorizerBase :-). The initial Realm design definitely

Re: Tomcat 5.0: Source Code

2002-11-26 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, micael wrote: Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 16:30:50 -0800 From: micael [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tomcat 5.0: Source Code Okay, taking a chance on public humiliation here. Nah, that'd be mean :-).

RE: [Jasper2] framework for tag optimization

2002-11-24 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Peter Lin wrote: Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 20:25:52 -0800 (PST) From: Peter Lin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Jasper2] framework for tag optimization I sent the

Re: Why can I not use attributes lang and maxRows in a customtag

2002-11-23 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Jim Cobban wrote: Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 11:17:50 -0500 From: Jim Cobban [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jim Cobban [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jan Luehe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Why can I not use

RE: [Jasper2] framework for tag optimization

2002-11-23 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Peter Romianowski wrote: Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 15:22:15 +0100 From: Peter Romianowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Tomcat Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Jasper2] framework for tag optimization Just a

RE: [Jasper2] framework for tag optimization

2002-11-23 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Peter Romianowski wrote: Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 18:05:29 +0100 From: Peter Romianowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Tomcat Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Jasper2] framework for tag optimization If you

RE: [Jasper2] framework for tag optimization

2002-11-23 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Peter Lin wrote: Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 12:36:50 -0800 (PST) From: Peter Lin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Jasper2] framework for tag optimization So it would seam

Re: Why can I not use attributes lang and maxRows in a customtag

2002-11-23 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Paul Speed wrote: Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 18:50:34 -0500 From: Paul Speed [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Why can I not use attributes lang and maxRows in a custom tag

Re: ServletOutputStreamWrapper

2002-11-14 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On 14 Nov 2002, Paul Hunnisett wrote: Date: 14 Nov 2002 20:05:07 + From: Paul Hunnisett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ServletOutputStreamWrapper Thanks Craig, I'll take a look at that -

Re: Authenticator Documentation

2002-11-14 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Bill Barker wrote: Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 22:08:36 -0800 From: Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Authenticator Documentation Browsing the documentation for 4.1.x, I

Re: Authenticator Documentation

2002-11-14 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: During initialization of a new webapp, Catalina uses the value of the login-method (which should be BASIC, DIGEST, FORM, or CLIENT-CERT) It probably would have been useful to say that the login-method is found in the /WEB-INF/web.xml deployment

Re: Authenticator Documentation

2002-11-14 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 10:47 PM Subject: Re: Authenticator Documentation On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Bill Barker wrote: Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 22:08:36 -0800 From: Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Servlet Spec interpretation FORM-based authentication

2002-11-12 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
See below. On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Algirdas P. Veitas wrote: Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 21:56:46 -0700 From: Algirdas P. Veitas [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Servlet Spec interpretation FORM-based authentication Folks, I am

Re: [4.1.15] Tag tomorrow

2002-11-12 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 17:01:49 +0100 From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [4.1.15] Tag tomorrow Glenn Nielsen wrote: Remy, I

Re: ServletOutputStreamWrapper

2002-11-12 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On 12 Nov 2002, Paul Hunnisett wrote: Date: 12 Nov 2002 19:38:18 + From: Paul Hunnisett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ServletOutputStreamWrapper Thanks Dan, I'll try that. Basically what

Re: Servlet Spec interpretation FORM-based authentication

2002-11-12 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Algirdas P. Veitas wrote: Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 16:04:36 -0700 From: Algirdas P. Veitas [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Servlet Spec interpretation FORM-based authentication

Re: [VOTE] Proposed jspc refactoring

2002-11-07 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Henri Gomez wrote: Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 12:43:45 +0100 From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [VOTE] Proposed jspc refactoring Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi,

Re: Possible bug in RequestDispatcher?

2002-11-04 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
In Servlet 2.3 (i.e. Tomcat 4.x), filters are *not* invoked on request dispatcher calls -- only on the original request. In Servlet 2.4 (i.e. Tomcat 5.x) you can optionally configure which filters should be used on forwards, includes, or both, with suitable settings in web.xml. Craig On Mon, 4

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/naming/resourcesLocalStrings_fr.properties

2002-10-31 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Jean-Francois Arcand wrote: De toute petite corrections ;-) ... ah ces Quebbecois! Is this going to be as bad as American versus British English speakers? :-) -- Jeanfrancois Craig -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org For

Re: WEB.XML not reloaded???

2002-10-16 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Glenn Nielsen wrote: Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 20:33:43 -0500 From: Glenn Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: WEB.XML not reloaded??? Pier Fumagalli wrote: Anyone

Re: apps conversion from 3.3.1 to 4.1.12

2002-10-10 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Henri Gomez wrote: Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 08:10:03 +0200 From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: apps conversion from 3.3.1 to 4.1.12 If this reference is in

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat4CoyoteConnector.java

2002-10-10 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Costin Manolache wrote: Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 21:29:51 -0700 From: Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: cvs commit:

Re: apps conversion from 3.3.1 to 4.1.12

2002-10-09 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Henri Gomez wrote: Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 17:39:00 +0200 From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: apps conversion from 3.3.1 to 4.1.12 Remy Maucherat wrote:

Re: apps conversion from 3.3.1 to 4.1.12

2002-10-09 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Henri Gomez wrote: Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 18:13:10 +0200 From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: apps conversion from 3.3.1 to 4.1.12 Haven't looked at the

RE: [5.0] [VOTE] Removal of the LE distribution

2002-10-03 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Costin Manolache wrote: Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 11:30:47 -0700 From: Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [5.0] [VOTE] Removal of the LE distribution iasandcb wrote: First all, I

Re: Tomcat 4.1.12 and Servlet Access 404 Errors: BUG? One Last Assurance

2002-10-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, micael wrote: Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 00:12:20 -0700 From: micael [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Tomcat 4.1.12 and Servlet Access 404 Errors: BUG? One Last Assurance

Re: THE SOURCE, LUKE: JBoss/Tomcat Mystery

2002-10-01 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, micael wrote: Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 23:07:58 -0700 From: micael [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: THE SOURCE, LUKE: JBoss/Tomcat Mystery Below is the source index.html I am getting when I access

[Volunteer Needed] - TOMCAT-DEV Moderation

2002-09-18 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
I need a volunteer to take over moderation of the TOMCAT-DEV mailing list. Basically, this involves replying yes or no to a message from the mailing list server when non-subscribers attempt to post. Most of this kind of mail falls into the following categories: * Spam * Bug reports from

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11Http11Processor.java

2002-09-18 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Bill Barker wrote: Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 12:06:50 -0700 From: Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: cvs commit:

Re: [Volunteer Needed] - TOMCAT-DEV Moderation

2002-09-18 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Volunteer Needed] - TOMCAT-DEV Moderation Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 13:41:42 -0700 (PDT) I would be honoured to serve you in any way I can Best Wishes Edward Banfa Craig R

Re: 4.1.10 tarball is borked.

2002-09-12 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote: Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 19:27:31 +0100 From: Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 4.1.10 tarball is borked. Whoever packaged the tar gzip

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina build.xml

2002-09-11 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On 11 Sep 2002, Stefan Bodewig wrote: Date: 11 Sep 2002 09:58:54 +0200 From: Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina build.xml On 11 Sep 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Contributing patches/enhancements?

2002-09-11 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Eddie Ruvinsky wrote: Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 15:16:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Eddie Ruvinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Contributing patches/enhancements? Hello, I have a process question about how

Re: Spec question: RE BUG 12052

2002-08-29 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Bill Barker wrote: FWIW, I agree that the 2.4 servlet-spec and the CGI-spec are out of sync here. If I actually thought that any members of the JCP were subscribed to this list, I'd think to ask for clarification before 2.4 went final. :) The way to ask would be to

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/servletJspServletWrapper.java

2002-08-29 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
/apache/jasper/servlet JspServletWrapper.java Kin-Man Chung wrote: Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 16:41:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/servlet JspServletWrapper.java To: Tomcat

Re: Spec question: RE BUG 12052

2002-08-28 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On 28 Aug 2002, Bojan Smojver wrote: Date: 28 Aug 2002 23:27:18 +1000 From: Bojan Smojver [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Dev List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Spec question: RE BUG 12052 Craig, I think this bug report is invalid, since

RE: Spec question: RE BUG 12052

2002-08-28 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
- From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 12:15 PM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: Spec question: RE BUG 12052 On 28 Aug 2002, Bojan Smojver wrote: Date: 28 Aug 2002 23:27:18 +1000 From: Bojan Smojver [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: an httpclient question

2002-08-27 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Zhenxin wang wrote: Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 17:41:55 -0700 From: Zhenxin wang [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: an httpclient question Hi, I am looking into using apache

Re: jasper package

2002-08-19 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, [gb2312] Yunfeng Hou wrote: Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 11:35:17 +0800 (CST) From: [gb2312] Yunfeng Hou [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: jasper package Jasper has command line option to set package name,

Re: jasper package

2002-08-19 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, [gb2312] Yunfeng Hou wrote: Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 13:13:14 +0800 (CST) From: [gb2312] Yunfeng Hou [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: jasper package A desire to do this in

Re: Adding a cookie via a filterChain...

2002-08-16 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 16 Aug 2002, Les Parker wrote: Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 10:00:14 -0600 From: Les Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Adding a cookie via a filterChain... Does anyone have some example code that adds a cookie to

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >