> With my team, I try to stress that JSPs can (and
> actually should) be used to implement both View and
> Control aspects of MVC and to address this we have
> adopted (hopefully) strong standards for how we do JSP
> development. There is more to it, but basically we
> conceptually separate JSPs
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 02:00
>
> ...
>
> My only complaints would be not
> enough debug tools around to be able to single step through new code
> when you are having problems,
>
> ...
JBuilder 4 works j
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 20:57
>
> ...
>
> Nothing wrong - yet another fine language, and a very nice
> implementation.
> And nothing good either - or I coulnd't find anything revolutionary
> compared with
I could be wrong given I don't know the full context, but the code from the
article on this page:
http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/ymtd/ymtd-generation.html isn't thead
safe, multiple requests coming in on different threads at the same time
would cause init() to be called multiple times.
-Matt
--- Jon Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mel,
>
> Please do not CC me directly as I'm already on the
> list.
Sorry - artifact of how I started the reply (from
browsing the essay). Oops.
> I have filed your
> changes away for when I do my next revision of the
> site (there are several
> o
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Mel Martinez wrote:
> The above paragraph describes a 'fundamental issue'
> that has absolutely nothing to do with the Java Server
> Pages specification and, rather, entirely to do with a
> particular implementation of the specification. As
And most of the other arguments ar
--- Nick Bauman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Read Jon's article about the problems of JSP.
>
> http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/ymtd/ymtd.html
>
> I read it and it made me rethink a lot of
> assumptions I had made about JSP.
>
Without getting into the larger debate - actually
agree with man
--- Nick Bauman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Read Jon's article about the problems of JSP.
>
> http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/ymtd/ymtd.html
>
> I read it and it made me rethink a lot of
> assumptions I had made about JSP.
>
Without getting into the larger debate - actually
agree with man
> I do have all the latest jar files from SUNW, and jakarta-apache. So I
> don't know what the problems could be. My only complaints would be not
> enough debug tools around to be able to single step through new code
> when you are having problems, but I consider that minor at this point,
> given
Read Jon's article about the problems of JSP.
http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/ymtd/ymtd.html
I read it and it made me rethink a lot of assumptions I had made about JSP.
> An alternative view!
>
> On 4 Apr, Brad Cox wrote:
>> At 11:24 AM -0700 04/04/2001, Jon Stevens wrote:
>>>I love the ar
An alternative view!
On 4 Apr, Brad Cox wrote:
> At 11:24 AM -0700 04/04/2001, Jon Stevens wrote:
>>I love the article title:
>>"Just say no to JSP"
I am really sorry to see folks coming on this list, and also publishing
to the general web articles deriding JSP and tomcat in particular. I
have a
11 matches
Mail list logo
